Literature DB >> 33539983

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Preference Most Dependent on Patient Age: A Survey of United States Surgeons.

Eric N Bowman1, Orr Limpisvasti2, Brian J Cole3, Neal S ElAttrache2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) graft preference of surgeons and to explore factors associated with their predilection.
METHODS: A 15-question survey regarding ACLR graft preference in various situations was completed by 514 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Association of North America surgeons. Surgeon and practice demographics, along with various patient factors, were evaluated with bivariate and multivariable models for association with surgeon preference. Surgeons were also queried about their preference for their own ACLR. For surgeons who personally sustained an ACL, an additional 6 questions inquired about their experience.
RESULTS: Surgeons reported the 5 most important factors in patient graft choice, in order: patient age, graft failure in literature and practice, pivot sport, and patient preference. Autograft patellar and quadriceps tendon were strongly preferred for younger, pivoting athletes (P < .001), among those with fellowship training (47% vs 33%, P = .006), in academic practices (52% vs 44%, P = .003), and in more sports medicine-specific practices, with a higher number of ACLRs performed per year (P < .001). Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, and Southwest surgeons had lower hamstring autograft preference (P < .001). Non-fellowship-trained surgeons preferred hamstring autograft (P = .010). Allograft was preferred for older patients (P < .001). Nonsignificant predictors included highest level of athlete for whom an ACLR had been performed, level of athlete serving as team physician, and years in practice. No factors were associated with surgeon preference for their own ACLR despite deeming these factors important for patients. ACL tears were reported by 13% of respondents, with 86% stating it influenced their decision to enter orthopaedics.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient age was the most important factor in graft choice, with patellar and quadriceps tendon autograft the preferred graft for ACLR for younger, pivoting athletes. Fellowship training and practice demographics were also correlated with graft choice for patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Graft preference for ACLR varies among surgeons and is associated with surgeon experience and patient characteristics, including patient age, type of sport, and patient preference.
Copyright © 2021 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33539983     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

Review 1.  An increased posterior tibial slope is associated with a higher risk of graft failure following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhongcheng Liu; Jin Jiang; Qiong Yi; Yuanjun Teng; Xuening Liu; Jinwen He; Kun Zhang; Lifu Wang; Fei Teng; Bin Geng; Yayi Xia; Meng Wu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Surgeon's experience, sports participation and a concomitant MCL injury increase the use of patellar and quadriceps tendon grafts in primary ACL reconstruction: a nationwide registry study of 39,964 surgeries.

Authors:  Dzan Rizvanovic; Markus Waldén; Magnus Forssblad; Anders Stålman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.114

3.  Lateral Harvest of an Osseous-Based Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Results in Thinner Remaining Patellar Bone.

Authors:  Allison K Perry; Navya Dandu; Derrick M Knapik; Nozomu Inoue; Safa Gursoy; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Adam B Yanke; Jorge Chahla
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Hamstring tendon autografts and allografts show comparable clinical outcomes and knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients over fifty years old with no signs of osteoarthritis progression.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Riccardo Giorgino; Katia Corona; Tarun Jaykumar; Ilaria Mariani; Nicola Ursino; Laura Mangiavini; Raju Vaishya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 5.  Autograft and Nonirradiated Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Demonstrate Similar Clinical Outcomes and Graft Failure Rates: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jaydeep Dhillon; Matthew J Kraeutler; John W Belk; Eric C McCarty; Patrick C McCulloch; Anthony J Scillia
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-06-06

6.  Comparable Instrumented Knee Joint Laxity and Patient-Reported Outcomes After ACL Repair With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization or ACL Reconstruction: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Johannes Glasbrenner; Michael J Raschke; Christoph Kittl; Elmar Herbst; Christian Peez; Thorben Briese; Philipp A Michel; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Kösters; Benedikt Schliemann
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 7.010

7.  Minimal graft site morbidity using autogenous semitendinosus graft from the uninjured leg: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christoffer von Essen; Sebastian McCallum; Karl Eriksson; Björn Barenius
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 4.114

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.