Literature DB >> 33539857

Relation of Cardiovascular Risk Factors to Mortality and Cardiovascular Events in Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (from the Yale COVID-19 Cardiovascular Registry).

Manan Pareek1, Avinainder Singh1, Lina Vadlamani1, Maxwell Eder1, Justin Pacor1, Jakob Park1, Zaniar Ghazizadeh1, Alex Heard1, Ana Sofia Cruz-Solbes1, Roozbeh Nikooie1, Chad Gier1, Zain V Ahmed2, James V Freeman2, Judith Meadows1, Kim G E Smolderen2, Rachel Lampert2, Eric J Velazquez2, Tariq Ahmad2, Nihar R Desai3.   

Abstract

Individuals with established cardiovascular disease or a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors may be particularly vulnerable to develop complications from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a prospective cohort study at a tertiary care center to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, new acute decompensated heart failure, venous thromboembolism, ventricular or atrial arrhythmia, pericardial effusion, or aborted cardiac arrest) among consecutively hospitalized adults with COVID-19, using multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. The study population comprised 586 COVID-19 positive patients. Median age was 67 (IQR: 55 to 80) years, 47.4% were female, and 36.7% had cardiovascular disease. Considering risk factors, 60.2% had hypertension, 39.8% diabetes, and 38.6% hyperlipidemia. Eighty-two individuals (14.0%) died in-hospital, and 135 (23.0%) experienced MACE. In a model adjusted for demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory findings, age (odds ratio [OR], 1.28 per 5 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13 to 1.45), previous ventricular arrhythmia (OR, 18.97; 95% CI, 3.68 to 97.88), use of P2Y12-inhibitors (OR, 7.91; 95% CI, 1.64 to 38.17), higher C-reactive protein (OR, 1.81: 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.78), lower albumin (OR, 0.64: 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.86), and higher troponin T (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.46) were associated with mortality (p <0.05). After adjustment for demographics, presentation, and laboratory findings, predictors of MACE were higher respiratory rates, altered mental status, and laboratory abnormalities, including higher troponin T (p <0.05). In conclusion, poor prognostic markers among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 included older age, pre-existing cardiovascular disease, respiratory failure, altered mental status, and higher troponin T concentrations.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33539857      PMCID: PMC7849530          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   3.133


Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) constitutes an ongoing global pandemic with considerable public health implications. As of January 7, 2021, >87 million cases had been reported in 191 countries, and ∼1.9 million deaths had been attributed to this condition. Similar to other common viral illnesses, individuals with established cardiovascular disease or a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors appear to be particularly vulnerable during infection.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Concerns have also been raised that use of certain medications that affect the cardiovascular system, notably inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), may enhance infectivity and the likelihood of experiencing a severe disease course. , Finally, the infection itself may increase the risk of cardiovascular complications, such as arrhythmia, heart failure, thromboembolic events, and myocarditis.11, 12, 13 Therefore, we designed this study to determine the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, established cardiovascular disease, and associated medications, and to identify risk factors for incident cardiovascular events and mortality, among hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Methods

The study was conducted at Yale New Haven Hospital (YNHH), a nonprofit, 1,541-bed tertiary care medical center operated by the Yale New Haven Health System (YNHHS), and located in New Haven, Connecticut, USA. The Yale COVID-19 Cardiovascular Registry is an ongoing retrospective and prospective registry that is collecting data from all adult patients (age ≥18 years) admitted or transferred to YNHH with a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2. The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was made using a reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay or high-throughput sequencing, with nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab specimens obtained at any point before or during hospitalization. However, patients could also be included to the registry if discharged with a diagnosis of COVID-19, using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) emergency code, U07.1. For the present analysis, we included all participants admitted between March 1 and May 31, 2020 with a final disposition, that is, either in-hospital death or survival to hospital discharge. On March 19, the YNHHS COVID-19 Treatment team, led by a multidisciplinary team of physicians, released the first version of its treatment algorithm for patients with nonsevere and severe disease (Appendix 1). Per this algorithm, proposed indications for active treatment included (1) respiratory failure with mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, (2) an oxygen saturation ≤93% on room air or on chronic oxygen supplementation, or (3) fever and/or symptoms of respiratory disease plus abnormal chest imaging plus at least 1 risk factors for adverse outcomes (age >60 years, body mass index ≥40 kg/m2, chronic heart disease, chronic lung disease, or immunosuppressed state). Patients receiving >3 L/min of oxygen supplementation required evaluation by the intensive care unit (ICU). Interruption of ongoing treatment with RAAS-inhibitors or NSAIDs was not advised unless indicated for conventional reasons. Recommended laboratory studies included those related to hematology, inflammation, and circulatory function. The treatment algorithm has been updated numerous times since its release, and the latest version was published on November 25, 2020. Information on hospitalized patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result was acquired through the local Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership repository and the Joint Data Analytics Team at YNHHS, resources that provide customized reporting and data analysis from the electronic health record system, Epic. Study data were subsequently obtained through manual review of each patient's electronic health record by physicians. We collected data related to demographics, including prevalent cardiovascular risk factors, conditions, and medications, presenting symptoms, vital signs, laboratory test results, imaging findings, electrocardiograms, and in-hospital events, including cardiovascular and COVID-19-specific medication use, supportive measures, ICU admission, cardiovascular events, other pertinent clinical events, and mortality. The institutional review board at Yale University approved the study under an expedited review. The design of the registry is illustrated in Figure 1 .
Figure 1.

Design of the registry.

Design of the registry. Cardiac troponin T was measured using a 4th generation electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Elecsys, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The lower limit of detection (99th percentile upper reference limit) was 0.010 μg/L, and the lowest concentration with a coefficient of variation ≤10% was 0.30 μg/L (intermediate within lot precision) or 0.060 μg/L (intermediate lot to lot precision). The primary endpoint was in-hospital death from any cause. The secondary endpoint was in-hospital MACE, defined as a composite of type 1 or 2 myocardial infarction, stroke, new acute decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock, venous thromboembolism, new-onset ventricular arrhythmia, new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter, pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade, or aborted cardiac arrest. Myocardial infarction was defined according to the Fourth Universal Definition. Cardiac events were adjudicated by experienced physicians (Appendix 2). Other endpoints that were included for descriptive purposes were ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and new renal replacement therapy. Continuous variables are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and corresponding percentages. Unadjusted differences in clinical and laboratory characteristics between survivors and nonsurvivors were examined using Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-squared test, or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. We subsequently performed multivariable binary logistic regression with backward elimination (2-sided p-entry on univariable analysis: 0.10; 2-sided p-retention in the multivariable model: 0.10) to identify variables associated with the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. Age and sex were forced into the regression models where necessary. For each endpoint, 3 subsets of models were rendered, using (1) demographic characteristics alone (model 1), (2) demographic characteristics and clinical presentation (model 2), and (3) demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory findings (model 3). No collinearity of importance was detected in the final models (maximum variance inflation factor of 1.22). Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for variables that were retained were then shown using Forest plots. For laboratory studies, ORs were reported for 1 standard deviation increase in the logarithmically transformed concentrations. A 2-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. No adjustments for multiple comparisons were made as the study was considered exploratory. Stata/IC 15 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) was used for all computations.

Results

The study population comprised 586 COVID-19 positive patients who were admitted between March 1 and May 31, 2020 and had completed their hospital course. Median age was 67 (IQR: 55 to 80) years, 47.4% were female, and 49.0%, 30.7%, and 16.0% identified as Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic, respectively. A history of cardiovascular disease was reported in 36.7%, the most common of which were coronary artery disease (18.1%), heart failure (17.1%), and atrial arrhythmia (12.2%). In terms of risk factors, 60.2% had hypertension, 39.8% had diabetes mellitus, and 38.6% had hyperlipidemia. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers were used by 32.9%, beta blockers by 30.0%, diuretics (including mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) by 27.5%, aspirin by 29.5%, and NSAIDs by 11.3%. Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and medications, stratified according to vital status at discharge, are provided in Table 1 .
Table 1

Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and medications in patients with COVID-19 who survived and did not survive to hospital discharge

Survived to hospital discharge
CharacteristicYes(n = 504)No(n = 82)p-value for difference
Age (years)65 (54-78)79.5 (68-89)<0.001
Women (%)248 (49.2%)30 (37%)0.03
Non-Hispanic White236 (46.8%)51 (62%)0.05
Non-Hispanic Black162 (32.1%)18 (22%)
Hispanic82 (16.3%)12 (15%)
Other or unknown race24 (4.8%)1 (1%)
Comorbidity
Coronary artery disease79 (15.7%)27 (33%)<0.001
Cerebrovascular disease47 (9.3%)17 (21%)0.002
Peripheral artery disease15 (3.0%)8 (10%)0.003
Heart failure or cardiomyopathy72 (14.3%)28 (34%)<0.001
Atrial fibrillation or flutter51 (10.1%)20 (24%)<0.001
Ventricular arrhythmia7 (1.4%)5 (6%)0.005
Diabetes mellitus194 (38.5%)39 (48%)0.12
Hypertension293 (58.1%)60 (73%)0.01
Hyperlipidemia188 (37.3%)38 (46%)0.12
Body mass index ≥30 kg/m2234 (46.4%)40 (49%)0.69
Venous thromboembolism40 (7.9%)6 (7%)0.85
Chronic lung disease109 (21.6%)16 (20%)0.67
Chronic kidney disease82 (16.3%)27 (33%)<0.001
Active or prior malignancy68 (13.5%)19 (23%)0.02
HIV or organ transplantation20 (4.0%)4 (5%)0.70
Medications
 ACE inhibitor or ARB161 (31.9%)32 (39%)0.21
 Beta blocker138 (27.4%)36 (44%)0.002
 Calcium channel blocker121 (24.0%)31 (38%)0.008
 Diuretic125 (24.8%)36 (44%)<0.001
 Aspirin146 (29.0%)27 (33%)0.47
 P2Y12 inhibitor11 (2.2%)7 (9%)0.002
 Statin183 (36.3%)40 (49%)0.03
 Anticoagulant56 (11.1%)13 (16%)0.22
 Antiarrhythmic13 (2.6%)4 (5%)0.25
 Nitrate or other antianginal14 (2.8%)2 (2%)0.86
 NSAID53 (10.5%)13 (16%)0.16

ACE = angiotensin converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin II receptor blocker; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Demographic characteristics, co-morbidities, and medications in patients with COVID-19 who survived and did not survive to hospital discharge ACE = angiotensin converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin II receptor blocker; HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Median time from symptom onset to admission was 4 (IQR: 1 to 7) days, and median length of hospital stay was 13 (IQR: 7 to 21) days. The most common presenting symptom was cough (59.6%), followed by fever or chills (58.7%), dyspnea (54.5%), and fatigue or malaise (34.1%). Presenting symptoms and vital signs at admission are shown in Table 2 .
Table 2

Presenting symptoms and vital signs at admission in patients with COVID-19 who survived and did not survive to hospital discharge

Survived to hospital discharge
Symptom or signYes(n = 504)No(n = 82)p-value for difference
Symptom duration (days)4 (1-7)3 (0-6)0.06
Length of hospital stay (days)13 (7-21)12 (6-21)0.63
Specific symptoms
 Fatigue or malaise169 (33.5%)31 (38%)0.45
 Fever or chills300 (59.5%)44 (54%)0.32
 Altered mental status48 (9.5%)14 (17%)0.04
 Headache57 (11.3%)5 (6%)0.16
 Nasal congestion35 (6.9%)6 (7%)0.90
 Anosmia20 (4.0%)00.09
 Ageusia15 (3.0%)00.25
 Cough292 (57.9%)57 (70%)0.05
 Sputum production52 (10.3%)11 (13%)0.40
 Hemoptysis3 (0.6%)3 (4%)0.04
 Sore throat35 (6.9%)2 (2%)0.15
 Shortness of breath261 (51.8%)58 (71%)<0.001
 Chest discomfort67 (13.3%)5 (6%)0.07
 Palpitations2 (0.4%)0>0.99
 Nausea or vomiting100 (19.8%)10 (12%)0.10
 Diarrhea120 (23.8%)17 (21%)0.54
 Abdominal pain42 (8.3%)5 (6%)0.49
 Myalgia96 (19.1%)9 (11%)0.08
Vital signs at admission
 Respiratory rate (bpm)18 (18-22)20 (18-24)0.001
 Oxygen saturation (%)96 (95-98)96 (94-98)0.97
 Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)127 (114-144)125.5 (106-141)0.26
 Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)74 (63-82)68 (57-80)0.04
 Heart rate (bpm)89 (76-103.5)89 (74-102)0.84
 Temperature (°F)99.8 (98.5-101.1)100.3 (98.4-101.3)0.85
Oxygen therapy at admission207 (41.1%)58 (71%)<0.001

bpm = breaths per minute (respiratory rate) and beats per minute (heart rate).

Presenting symptoms and vital signs at admission in patients with COVID-19 who survived and did not survive to hospital discharge bpm = breaths per minute (respiratory rate) and beats per minute (heart rate). A total of 82 (14.0%) individuals died in the hospital. Patients who died were more likely to be older (p <0.001), males (p = 0.03), and have a history of cardiovascular disease (p <0.001), including all its individual components except venous thromboembolism, and of chronic kidney disease (p <0.001). Furthermore, beta blockers (p = 0.002), calcium channel blockers (p = 0.008), diuretics (p <0.001), P2Y12 inhibitors (p = 0.002), and statins (p = 0.03) were more commonly used by nonsurvivors than by survivors (Table 1). Nonsurvivors more often presented with altered mental status (p = 0.04), hemoptysis (p = 0.04), and shortness of breath (p <0.001), and had higher respiratory rates (p = 0.001), lower diastolic blood pressures (p = 0.04), and more frequently required oxygen therapy (p <0.001) (Table 2). White blood cell count (p = 0.005), absolute neutrophil count (p <0.001), creatinine (p <0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (p <0.001), total bilirubin (p = 0.002), international normalized ratio (INR) (p <0.001), C-reactive protein (p <0.001), procalcitonin (p <0.001), ferritin (p = 0.02), D-dimer (p <0.001), troponin T (p <0.001), and NT-proBNP (p <0.001) were generally higher, whereas hemoglobin (p = 0.03), absolute lymphocyte count (p <0.001), platelet count (p = 0.002), and albumin (p <0.001) were lower, in patients who did not survive to hospital discharge. One-hundred and thirty-five (23.0%) patients experienced a MACE during their course of admission, most commonly new atrial fibrillation or flutter (7.9%), type 2 myocardial infarction (7.5%), venous thromboembolism (5.8%), or new acute decompensated heart failure (5.3%). Only 3 patients experienced a type 1 myocardial infarction, all of which were managed with percutaneous coronary intervention. Most patients with atrial fibrillation were managed with a rate control strategy. The incidence of composite and individual cardiovascular events stratified for survival status is presented in Table 3 .
Table 3

Cardiovascular events in patients with COVID-19 who survived and did not survive to hospital discharge

Survived to hospital discharge
EndpointYes(n = 504)No(n = 82)p-value for difference
MACE83 (16.5%)52 (63%)<0.001
Ischemic
 Type 1 myocardial infarction1 (0.2%)2 (2%)0.05
 Type 2 myocardial infarction22 (4.4%)22 (27%)<0.001
 Isolated myocardial injury46 (9.1%)18 (22%)<0.001
 Stroke4 (0.8%)7 (9%)<0.001
Heart failure
 New acute decompensated heart failure16 (3.2%)15 (18%)<0.001
 Worsening acute decompensated heart failure19 (3.8%)16 (20%)<0.001
 Cardiogenic shock4 (0.8%)8 (10%)<0.001
 Myocarditis00-
 Stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy4 (0.8%)00.55
Arrhythmia
 New-onset atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter27 (5.4%)19 (23%)<0.001
 New-onset ventricular arrhythmia14 (2.8%)5 (6%)0.12
Venous
 Pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis19 (3.8%)15 (18%)<0.001
Other
 Pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade2 (0.4%)3 (4%)0.02
 Aborted cardiac arrest5 (1.0%)16 (20%)<0.001

MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events.

Cardiovascular events in patients with COVID-19 who survived and did not survive to hospital discharge MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events. With respect to noncardiovascular events, 196 (33.5%) were admitted to the ICU, 111 (19.0%) required mechanical ventilation, and 24 of 557 (4.3%) underwent new renal replacement therapy. Importantly, 31 of 390 (8.0%) of patients who were not admitted to the ICU died, whereas 51 of 196 (26.0%) of patients admitted to the ICU died. Figure 2 provides a summary of cardiovascular risk and both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events in the study population.
Figure 2.

Summary of cardiovascular risk and both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events.

ACEi = angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ADHF = acute decompensated heart failure; ARB = angiotensin II receptor blocker; ASA = aspirin; BB = beta blocker; CAD = coronary artery disease; CHF = congestive heart failure; CRP = C-reactive protein; CVD = any cardiovascular disease; MV = mechanical ventilation; O2 = oxygen supplementation; P2Y12-inh. = P2Y12 inhibitor; RR = respiratory rate; TnT = troponin T; VT = ventricular tachycardia; VTE = venous thromboembolism; YRS = years.

Summary of cardiovascular risk and both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events. ACEi = angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ADHF = acute decompensated heart failure; ARB = angiotensin II receptor blocker; ASA = aspirin; BB = beta blocker; CAD = coronary artery disease; CHF = congestive heart failure; CRP = C-reactive protein; CVD = any cardiovascular disease; MV = mechanical ventilation; O2 = oxygen supplementation; P2Y12-inh. = P2Y12 inhibitor; RR = respiratory rate; TnT = troponin T; VT = ventricular tachycardia; VTE = venous thromboembolism; YRS = years. Figure 3 shows the predictors of in-hospital death from any cause, using the 3 regression model subsets. Demographic and clinical characteristics that were significantly associated with a higher risk of death in at least 1 model included older age, male sex, history of heart failure, history of ventricular arrhythmias, use of P2Y12 inhibitors, use of oxygen therapy at admission, and higher respiratory rates. Unfavorable laboratory findings included higher C-reactive protein, lower albumin, and higher troponin T.
Figure 3.

Predictors of in-hospital death from multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. (A) Based on demographic characteristics (model 1); (B) Based on demographic characteristics and clinical presentation (model 2); (C) Based on demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory findings (model 3).

CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.

For laboratory studies, odds ratios are reported for 1 standard deviation increase in the logarithmically transformed concentrations.

Predictors of in-hospital death from multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. (A) Based on demographic characteristics (model 1); (B) Based on demographic characteristics and clinical presentation (model 2); (C) Based on demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory findings (model 3). CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio. For laboratory studies, odds ratios are reported for 1 standard deviation increase in the logarithmically transformed concentrations. Factors associated with MACE in at least 1 model were older age, male sex, history of coronary artery disease, use of oxygen therapy at admission, higher respiratory rates, altered mental status, lower absolute lymphocyte count, higher total bilirubin, lower albumin, and higher troponin T (Figure 4 ).
Figure 4.

Predictors of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events from multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. (A) Based on demographic characteristics (model 1); (B) Based on demographic characteristics and clinical presentation (model 2); (C) Based on demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory findings (model 3).

CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.

For laboratory studies, odds ratios are reported for 1 standard deviation increase in the logarithmically transformed concentrations.

Predictors of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events from multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. (A) Based on demographic characteristics (model 1); (B) Based on demographic characteristics and clinical presentation (model 2); (C) Based on demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and laboratory findings (model 3). CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio. For laboratory studies, odds ratios are reported for 1 standard deviation increase in the logarithmically transformed concentrations.

Discussion

Our observational study of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 at a tertiary care medical center in the United States showed high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and disease. Pre-existing cardiovascular disease, older age, male sex, early need for oxygen supplementation, higher respiratory rates, altered mental status, and laboratory abnormalities, including higher troponin T concentrations were among the characteristics related to poor outcomes. There were no associations of RAAS-inhibitors or NSAIDs with either mortality or cardiovascular events. Our study is particularly notable for its data acquisition through manual chart review and event adjudication by experienced physicians, approaches that provide more reliable information than use of administrative registries alone. Respiratory infections are known to increase the risk of major cardiovascular events and mortality. , , This is particularly well-established for seasonal influenza where vaccination appears to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by 15% to 20% among high-risk individuals. , Both age and male sex predict adverse outcomes among patients with influenza, associations that may extend to those with COVID-19. , 4, 5, 6 , , Whereas the exact mechanism for male predominance in the context of SARS-CoV infections remains obscure, a possible explanation may be offered by sex-related differences in both innate and adaptive immunity related to estrogen receptor signaling. Our findings also support earlier reports that suggested pre-existing cardiovascular disease as an unfavorable prognostic factor.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 , Indeed, the increased physiological demands imposed by severe infection affect persons with cardiovascular disease more seriously than those without. Poor cardiovascular reserve also negatively impacts upon the immune system, potentially leading to infection in itself. Importantly, we found no detrimental effects of RAAS-inhibitors or NSAIDs. Both received considerable attention early during the pandemic because of their potential ability to upregulate expression of ACE-2, the molecule used by SARS-CoV2 for endocytic internalization. , Our results are in agreement with other observational studies of these drug classes , , and support the position statement of the European Society of Cardiology that treatment with RAAS-inhibitors should not be interrupted in patients with COVID-19. Considering another widely used medication, aspirin has been proposed to positively affect the disease course through inhibition of viral replication and reduced inflammation. We did not observe prognostic benefits of aspirin, although it may primarily have been used by individuals with established cardiovascular disease. Similarly, the associations between P2Y12 inhibitors (and calcium channel blockers) and mortality likely represented severity of co-morbid cardiovascular conditions rather than independent mechanistic effects. Previous COVID-19 cohorts also reported cough, fever, dyspnea, and fatigue as the most common disease manifestations.4, 5, 6, 7 , Altered mental status, hemoptysis and signs of respiratory failure were more frequent among patients who did not survive. On the other hand, detection of cardiovascular complications in patients with COVID-19 may be particularly challenging, exemplified by the high incidence of nonobstructive coronary disease despite ST-segment elevation. In the same way, although troponin elevations are common and have been associated with both mortality and cardiovascular events in this context, interpretation is difficult because they may not be reflective of a primary coronary event. , , 28, 29, 30 Indeed, whereas our findings supported previous reports showing that several biomarkers of organ function, inflammation, and circulatory stress were associated with adverse outcomes, none of these are specific for COVID-19. , , , , In addition to our high-quality study data, systematic use of an institutional treatment algorithm also ensured collection of multiple variables, including laboratory tests, allowing for thorough adjustments. A notable limitation included the observational design that prevented us from making finite inferences regarding causality. Indeed, it remains unclear whether the infection is involved in the pathogenesis of, or mainly acts as a trigger for, cardiovascular events in individuals at elevated risk. The limited number of events and associated power for detailed exploration of individual cardiovascular outcomes are additional shortcomings, and the wide MACE-definition may have also made it difficult to infer which endpoints drove the various associations. Given multiplicity, the p-values, particularly those assessing univariable associations, should be interpreted cautiously. Because we only included hospitalized patients, they were older and had a higher co-morbidity burden and mortality than unselected patients with COVID-19. In addition, our case mix of patients admitted directly to the hospital or transferred from other institutions makes generalizability uncertain as the latter group would be expected to have a more severe form of the disease. Ongoing randomized studies of RAAS-inhibitors and aspirin are thus eagerly anticipated, as is examination of cardiovascular outcomes after vaccine introduction. In the meantime, vigilance is required regarding optimization of treatment of prevalent cardiovascular risk factors and known conditions, potentially leading to a reduced risk of complications in the setting of COVID-19. In conclusion, consecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 had a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and disease. Pre-existing cardiovascular disease, older age, male sex, clinical manifestations of respiratory failure, and laboratory findings indicative of circulatory stress were associated with cardiovascular events and mortality, whereas use of RAAS-inhibitors and NSAIDs were not.

Author Statement

Manan Pareek: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization. Avinainder Singh: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization, Project administration. Lina Vadlamani: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Maxwell Eder: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Justin Pacor: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Jakob Park: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Zaniar Ghazizadeh: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Alex Heard: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Ana Sofia Cruz-Solbes: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Roozbeh Nikooie: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Chad Gier: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. Zain V. Ahmed: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing. James V. Freeman: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing, Project administration. Judith Meadows: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing, Project administration. Kim G. E. Smolderen: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing, Project administration. Rachel Lampert: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing, Project administration. Eric J. Velazquez: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing, Project administration. Tariq Ahmad: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing, Project administration. Nihar R. Desai: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Project administration.

Declaration of Interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding

N/A

Disclosures

The other authors do not report any relevant disclosures.
  8 in total

1.  Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes among Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: Findings from the World Heart Federation COVID-19 Study.

Authors:  Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Kavita Singh; Dimple Kondal; Lana Raspail; Bishav Mohan; Toru Kato; Nizal Sarrafzadegan; Shamim Hayder Talukder; Shahin Akter; Mohammad Robed Amin; Fastone Goma; Juan Gomez-Mesa; Ntobeko Ntusi; Francisca Inofomoh; Surender Deora; Evgenii Philippov; Alla Svarovskaya; Alexandra Konradi; Aurelio Puentes; Okechukwu S Ogah; Bojan Stanetic; Aurora Issa; Friedrich Thienemann; Dafsah Juzar; Ezequiel Zaidel; Sana Sheikh; Dike Ojji; Carolyn S P Lam; Junbo Ge; Amitava Banerjee; L Kristin Newby; Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro; Samuel Gidding; Fausto Pinto; Pablo Perel; Karen Sliwa
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  Prognostic implications of serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing among patients with COVID-19: A Danish nationwide registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Christoffer Polcwiartek; Maria L Krogager; Mikkel P Andersen; Jawad H Butt; Jannik Pallisgaard; Emil Fosbøl; Morten Schou; Deepak L Bhatt; Avinainder Singh; Lars Køber; Gunnar H Gislason; Casper N Bang; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Kristian Kragholm; Manan Pareek
Journal:  Am Heart J Plus       Date:  2022-04-16

3.  Heart failure in COVID-19: the multicentre, multinational PCHF-COVICAV registry.

Authors:  Mateusz Sokolski; Sander Trenson; Justyna M Sokolska; Domenico D'Amario; Philippe Meyer; Nana K Poku; Tor Biering-Sørensen; Mats C Højbjerg Lassen; Kristoffer G Skaarup; Eduardo Barge-Caballero; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; Davide Stolfo; Gianfranco Sinagra; Klemens Ablasser; Viktoria Muster; Peter P Rainer; Markus Wallner; Alessandra Chiodini; Pascal S Heiniger; Fran Mikulicic; Judith Schwaiger; Stephan Winnik; Huseyin A Cakmak; Margherita Gaudenzi; Massimo Mapelli; Irene Mattavelli; Matthias Paul; Irina Cabac-Pogorevici; Claire Bouleti; Marzia Lilliu; Chiara Minoia; Jeroen Dauw; Jérôme Costa; Ahmet Celik; Nathan Mewton; Carlos E L Montenegro; Yuya Matsue; Goran Loncar; Michal Marchel; Aris Bechlioulis; Lampros Michalis; Marcus Dörr; Edgard Prihadi; Felix Schoenrath; Daniel R Messroghli; Wilfried Mullens; Lars H Lund; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Piotr Ponikowski; Frank Ruschitzka; Andreas J Flammer
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-09-17

4.  COVID-19, the Pandemic of the Century and Its Impact on Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Zhang; Mingjie Wang; Xian Zhang; Tianxiao Liu; Peter Libby; Guo-Ping Shi
Journal:  Cardiol Discov       Date:  2021-11-22

5.  The Prevalence and Associated Death of Ventricular Arrhythmia and Sudden Cardiac Death in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ziqi Tan; Shan Huang; Kaibo Mei; Menglu Liu; Jianyong Ma; Yuan Jiang; Wengen Zhu; Peng Yu; Xiao Liu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-21

Review 6.  Cardiac Registries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Jyotpal Singh; Michael-Roy R Durr; Elena Deptuch; Sabiha Sultana; Neha Mehta; Santiago Garcia; Timothy D Henry; Payam Dehghani
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.955

7.  A prediction model for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Dong Huang; Huan Yang; He Yu; Ting Wang; Zhu Chen; Rong Yao; Zongan Liang
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.320

8.  Prior Statin Use and Risk of Mortality and Severe Disease From Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zachary A Yetmar; Supavit Chesdachai; Tarek Kashour; Muhammad Riaz; Danielle J Gerberi; Andrew D Badley; Elie F Berbari; Imad M Tleyjeh
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.835

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.