Literature DB >> 33539365

Safety, efficacy and airway complications of the flexible laryngeal mask airway in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: A retrospective study of 6661 patients.

Chunhua Xi1, Dongjing Shi1, Xu Cui1, Guyan Wang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although the flexible laryngeal mask airway (FLMA) provides considerable advantages in head and neck procedures, little is known about its safety and efficacy in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the success rate of FLMA and relevant airway complications in FESS under general anaesthesia.
METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent FESS for chronic rhinosinusitis was performed from 2015 to 2019. All patients scheduled for FLMA ventilation were identified. Patient characteristics, length of the surgery, FLMA size, failed FLMA cases requiring endotracheal intubation, immediate adverse airway events and delayed airway injuries were recorded. The primary outcomes included the FLMA success rate, which was defined as primary success after induction and final success after the whole surgical procedure. The secondary outcomes were specific clinical factors associated with FLMA failure and airway complications related to FLMA usage.
RESULTS: Of the 6661 patients included in our study, primary success was achieved in 6572 (98.7%), and final success was achieved in 6512 (97.8%). Failure occurred in 89 patients (1.3%) during induction, in 14 (0.2%) during surgical preparation and in 46 (0.7%) during the intraoperative procedure. All patients with failed FLMA ventilation were successfully switched to endotracheal intubation. Male sex, advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (ASA) and higher body mass index (BMI) were independent risk factors associated with failed FLMA. Immediate adverse respiratory events were observed in 0.85% of the patients, and delayed airway injuries associated with use of FLMA were observed in 0.07%.
CONCLUSION: This retrospective study demonstrates a high success rate for FLMA (97.8% in 6661 patients undergoing FESS). Adverse airway events and injuries associated with FLMA are rare, but clinicians should remain vigilant so that early diagnosis and prompt treatment can be provided.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33539365      PMCID: PMC7861430          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  34 in total

1.  The LMA-Flexible: time to celebrate a unique extraglottic airway device.

Authors:  Tom C van Zundert; Davide Cattano
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Anesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Daniel A Carlton; Satish Govindaraj
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 3.  Comparison of laryngeal mask airway vs tracheal intubation: a systematic review on airway complications.

Authors:  Babette F van Esch; Inge Stegeman; Adriana L Smit
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 9.452

4.  Differences in craniofacial structures and obesity in Caucasian and Chinese patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Richard W W Lee; Sivabalan Vasudavan; David S Hui; Tania Prvan; Peter Petocz; M Ali Darendeliler; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  The safety and efficacy of the use of the flexible laryngeal mask airway with positive pressure ventilation in elective ENT surgery: a 15-year retrospective single-center study.

Authors:  Vladimir Nekhendzy; Vijay K Ramaiah; Jeremy Collins; Hendrikus J Lemmens; Sam P Most
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  [Intraoperative bronchospasm during paranasal sinus surgery -- indicator of aspirin intolerance syndrome?].

Authors:  A Rozsasi; N Blidaru; M Rockemann; B Santak; D Polzehl; T Keck
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 1.057

7.  Laryngeal mask airway vs. uncuffed endotracheal tube for nasal and paranasal sinus surgery: paediatric airway protection.

Authors:  Khalid A Al-Mazrou; Khalid M Abdullah; Mohamed S ElGammal; Riaz A Ansari; Ahmed Turkistani; Mohamed E Abdelmeguid
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu AuraGain™ laryngeal mask versus the LMA® protector airway in paralyzed, anesthetized adult men.

Authors:  Berthold Moser; Laurent Audigé; Christian Keller; Joseph Brimacombe; Lukas Gasteiger; Heinz R Bruppacher
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.

Authors:  Go Wun Kim; Jong Yeop Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Yeo Rae Moon; Eun Jeong Park; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Negative pressure pulmonary edema with laryngeal mask airway use: Recognition, pathophysiology and treatment modalities.

Authors:  Rashmi Vandse; Deven S Kothari; Ravi S Tripathi; Luis Lopez; Stanislaw P A Stawicki; Thomas J Papadimos
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2012-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.