Literature DB >> 33538951

Comparative transcriptome analyses between cultivated and wild grapes reveal conservation of expressed genes but extensive rewiring of co-expression networks.

Thor V M Fajardo1, Vera Quecini2.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: The transcriptomes of wild and cultivated grapes consists of similar expressed genes but distinct wiring of co-expressed modules associated with environmental conditions. Grapevine is an important fruit crop worldwide, with high economic value and widespread distribution. Commercial production is based on Vitis vinifera, and, to a lesser extent, on hybrids with American grapes, such as V. labrusca. Wild grape relatives are important sources of resistance against biotic and abiotic factors; however, their global gene expression patterns remain poorly characterized. We associated genome-wide transcript profiling to phenotypic analyses to investigate the responses of cultivated and wild vines to vineyard conditions. The expressed genes in the Vitis reference transcriptome are largely shared by wild grapes, V. labrusca hybrids and vinifera cultivars. In contrast, significant differential regulation between wild and vinifera genotypes represents 80% of gene expression variation, regardless of the environment. In wild grapes, genes associated to regulatory processes are downregulated, whereas those involved in metabolic pathways are upregulated, in comparison to vinifera. Photosynthesis-related ontologies are overrepresented in the induced genes, in agreement with higher contents of chlorophyll in wild grapes. Co-regulated gene network analyses provide evidence of more complex transcriptome organization in vinifera. In wild grapes, genes involved in signaling pathways of stress-related hormones are overrepresented in modules associated with the environment. Consensus network analyses revealed high preservation within co-regulated gene modules between cultivated and wild grapes, but divergent relationships among the expression clusters. In conclusion, the distinct phenotypes of wild and cultivated grapes are underlain by differences in gene expression, but also by distinct higher-order organization of the transcriptome and contrasting association of co-expressed gene clusters with the environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental conditions; Grapevine; Network analysis; Parthenocissus; Phenology; Transcriptome; Vitaceae

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33538951     DOI: 10.1007/s11103-021-01122-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Mol Biol        ISSN: 0167-4412            Impact factor:   4.076


  49 in total

Review 1.  A molecular genetic perspective of reproductive development in grapevine.

Authors:  María José Carmona; Jamila Chaïb; José Miguel Martínez-Zapater; Mark R Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 2.  Recent advances in biotechnological studies on wild grapevines as valuable resistance sources for smart viticulture.

Authors:  Samia Daldoul; Hatem Boubakri; Mahmoud Gargouri; Ahmed Mliki
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants.

Authors:  Steven Xijin Ge; Dongmin Jung; Runan Yao
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  A Rapid and effective method for RNA extraction from different tissues of grapevine and other woody plants.

Authors:  Giorgio Gambino; Irene Perrone; Ivana Gribaudo
Journal:  Phytochem Anal       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.373

5.  Transcriptomic analysis of the late stages of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) berry ripening reveals significant induction of ethylene signaling and flavor pathways in the skin.

Authors:  Grant R Cramer; Ryan Ghan; Karen A Schlauch; Richard L Tillett; Hildegarde Heymann; Alberto Ferrarini; Massimo Delledonne; Sara Zenoni; Marianna Fasoli; Mario Pezzotti
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  The common transcriptional subnetworks of the grape berry skin in the late stages of ripening.

Authors:  Ryan Ghan; Juli Petereit; Richard L Tillett; Karen A Schlauch; David Toubiana; Aaron Fait; Grant R Cramer
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Short day transcriptomic programming during induction of dormancy in grapevine.

Authors:  Anne Y Fennell; Karen A Schlauch; Satyanarayana Gouthu; Laurent G Deluc; Vedbar Khadka; Lekha Sreekantan; Jerome Grimplet; Grant R Cramer; Katherine L Mathiason
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  A new version of the grapevine reference genome assembly (12X.v2) and of its annotation (VCost.v3).

Authors:  A Canaguier; J Grimplet; G Di Gaspero; S Scalabrin; E Duchêne; N Choisne; N Mohellibi; C Guichard; S Rombauts; I Le Clainche; A Bérard; A Chauveau; R Bounon; C Rustenholz; M Morgante; M-C Le Paslier; D Brunel; A-F Adam-Blondon
Journal:  Genom Data       Date:  2017-09-18

9.  Vitis vinifera L. Fruit Diversity to Breed Varieties Anticipating Climate Changes.

Authors:  Antoine Bigard; Dargie T Berhe; Eleonora Maoddi; Yannick Sire; Jean-Michel Boursiquot; Hernan Ojeda; Jean-Pierre Péros; Agnès Doligez; Charles Romieu; Laurent Torregrosa
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 10.  Cutting the Gordian Knot of abiotic stress in grapevine: From the test tube to climate change adaptation.

Authors:  Luísa C Carvalho; Sara Amâncio
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.500

View more
  1 in total

1.  Vitis OneGenE: A Causality-Based Approach to Generate Gene Networks in Vitis vinifera Sheds Light on the Laccase and Dirigent Gene Families.

Authors:  Stefania Pilati; Giulia Malacarne; David Navarro-Payá; Gabriele Tomè; Laura Riscica; Valter Cavecchia; José Tomás Matus; Claudio Moser; Enrico Blanzieri
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-11-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.