Literature DB >> 33538790

Efficacy of Endocrine Therapy for the Treatment of Breast Cancer in Men: Results from the MALE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mattea Reinisch1, Sabine Seiler2, Tanja Hauzenberger3, Axel Kamischke4, Sabine Schmatloch5, Hans-Joachim Strittmatter6, Dirk-Michael Zahm7, Christian Thode8, Jenny Furlanetto2, Dominika Strik9, Volker Möbus10, Toralf Reimer11, Bruno Valentin Sinn12, Elmar Stickeler13, Frederik Marmé14, Wolfgang Janni15, Marcus Schmidt16, Christian Rudlowski17, Michael Untch18, Valentina Nekljudova2, Sibylle Loibl2,19.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The extent of changes in estradiol levels in male patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving standard endocrine therapies is unknown. The sexual function and quality of life related to those changes have not been adequately evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the changes in estradiol levels in male patients with breast cancer after 3 months of therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter, phase 2 randomized clinical trial assessed 56 male patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Patients were recruited from 24 breast units across Germany between October 2012 and May 2017. The last patient completed 6 months of treatment in December 2017. The analysis data set was locked on August 24, 2018, and analysis was completed on December 19, 2018.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 arms: tamoxifen alone or tamoxifen plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) or aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus GnRHa for 6 months. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the change in estradiol levels from baseline to 3 months. Secondary end points were changes of estradiol levels after 6 months, changes of additional hormonal parameters, adverse effects, sexual function, and quality of life after 3 and 6 months.
RESULTS: In this phase 2 randomized clinical trial, a total of 52 of 56 male patients with a median (range) age of 61.5 (37-83) years started treatment. A total of 3 patients discontinued study treatment prematurely, 1 in each arm. A total of 50 patients were evaluable for the primary end point. After 3 months the patients' median estradiol levels increased by 67% (a change of +17.0 ng/L) with tamoxifen, decreased by 85% (-23.0 ng/L) with tamoxifen plus GnRHa, and decreased by 72% (-18.5 ng/L) with AI plus GnRHa (P < .001). After 6 months, median estradiol levels increased by 41% (a change of +12 ng/L) with tamoxifen, decreased by 61% (-19.5 ng/L) with tamoxifen plus GnRHa, and decreased by 64% (-17.0 ng/L) with AI plus GnRHa (P < .001). Sexual function and quality of life decreased when GnRHa was added but were unchanged with tamoxifen alone. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This phase 2 randomized clinical trial found that AI or tamoxifen plus GnRHa vs tamoxifen alone led to a sustained decrease of estradiol levels. The decreased hormonal parameters were associated with impaired sexual function and quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01638247.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33538790      PMCID: PMC7863014          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  6 in total

Review 1.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2022.

Authors:  Nina Ditsch; Achim Wöcke; Michael Untch; Christian Jackisch; Ute-Susann Albert; Maggie Banys-Paluchowski; Ingo Bauerfeind; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Wilfried Budach; Peter Dall; Eva Maria Fallenberg; Peter A Fasching; Tanja N Fehm; Michael Friedrich; Bernd Gerber; Oleg Gluz; Nadia Harbeck; Jörg Heil; Jens Huober; Hans H Kreipe; David Krug; Thorsten Kühn; Sherko Kümmel; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Sibylle Loibl; Diana Lüftner; Michael Patrick Lux; Nicolai Maass; Christoph Mundhenke; Ulrike Nitz; Tjoung-Won Park-Simon; Toralf Reimer; Kerstin Rhiem; Achim Rody; Marcus Schmidt; Andreas Schneeweiss; Florian Schütz; Hans-Peter Sinn; Christine Solbach; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Elmar Stickeler; Christoph Thomssen; Isabell Witzel; Volkmar Müller; Wolfgang Janni; Marc Thill
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.268

Review 2.  Male Breast Cancer: An Updated Review of Epidemiology, Clinicopathology, and Treatment.

Authors:  Guoliang Zheng; Jose Pablo Leone
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.501

Review 3.  Analysis of the Clinical Advancements for BRCA-Related Malignancies Highlights the Lack of Treatment Evidence for BRCA-Positive Male Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Dylan P McClurg; Gordan Urquhart; Trevor McGoldrick; Subarnarekha Chatterji; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Valerie Speirs; Beatrix Elsberger
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  An Update on the General Features of Breast Cancer in Male Patients-A Literature Review.

Authors:  Sinziana Ionescu; Alin Codrut Nicolescu; Marian Marincas; Octavia-Luciana Madge; Laurentiu Simion
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26

5.  Comparison between male and female breast cancer survival using propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Serena Scomersi; Fabiola Giudici; Giuseppe Cacciatore; Pasquale Losurdo; Stefano Fracon; Sara Cortinovis; Rita Ceccherini; Fabrizio Zanconati; Maura Tonutti; Marina Bortul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Metastatic Prostate Cancer Synchronous with Male Breast Papillary Ductal Carcinoma in situ: Management Dilemma and Literature Review.

Authors:  Harissa Husainy Hasbullah; Farah Wahida MdYusof; Amirah Hayati Ahmad; Omar Alzallal; Sharifah Emilia T T Sharif
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2021-06-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.