Literature DB >> 33537177

CDK1/2/5 blockade: killing two birds with one stone.

Jiao Liu1, Rui Kang2, Daolin Tang1,2.   

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an immune resistant tumor. We recently demonstrated that inhibiting CDK1/2/5 by dinaciclib not only blocks immune checkpoint expression, but also triggers histone-dependent immunogenic cell death. This dual mechanism turns immunologically "cold" tumor microenvironment into a "hot" one, improves overall survival rates in mouse PDAC models.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apoptosis; CDK; dinaciclib; histone; immune checkpoint; immunogenic cell death; immunotherapy; pancreatic cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33537177      PMCID: PMC7833763          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2021.1875612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive gastrointestinal cancer with an overall five-year survival rate of 9% in 2020. Globally, it is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Despite the increasing understanding of its genetic background and pathophysiology, PDAC is still ineffective against most currently available treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, which has improved the survival rate of many other cancers.[1] Although the underlying mechanism may be complex, the main reason challenging current immunotherapy is that PDAC has an immunosuppressive microenvironment and low immunogenicity.[2] In particular, the pancreatic tumor microenvironment shows increased stromal response and infiltration of M2 type anti-inflammatory macrophages, while total T-cell infiltration is reduced, which is the characteristic of the so-called “cold tumors”.[3] Accordingly, in recent years, a lot of efforts have focused on how to convert a “cold” into a “hot” tumor microenvironment using different ways.[2] Our recent drug screening and preclinical animal studies have demonstrated that the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor dinaciclib not only inhibits the expression of immune checkpoints, but also induces immunogenic cell death (ICD), thereby exerting a powerful anti-PDAC effect (Figure 1).[4]
Figure 1.

The strategy of boosting antitumor immune activity in PDAC by inhibiting CDK1/2/5. Inhibiting CDK1/2/5 by dinaciclib not only blocks IFNG-induced immune checkpoint expression, but also triggers histone-dependent immunogenic cell death

The strategy of boosting antitumor immune activity in PDAC by inhibiting CDK1/2/5. Inhibiting CDK1/2/5 by dinaciclib not only blocks IFNG-induced immune checkpoint expression, but also triggers histone-dependent immunogenic cell death

Inhibiting JUN-dependent immune checkpoint expression

Immune checkpoints are inhibitory modulators of the immune system and are essential for maintaining self-tolerance, preventing autoimmunity, and controlling the duration and extent of immune response to minimize collateral tissue damage. They are also expressed by certain types of immune system cells (e.g., T-cells and macrophages) and cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment, resulting in impaired anti-tumor immunity. Most immune checkpoints are membrane receptors or ligands (e.g., programmed cell death 1 [PDCD1/PD-1] and programmed death ligand 1 [CD274/PD-L1]), and some are cytoplasmic proteins or enzymes (e.g., indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 [IDO1]). Different tumor cells can express different immune checkpoints to prevent tumor killing mediated by cytotoxic T-cells. In particular, the combined use of IDO1 inhibitors produces promising responses in patients with metastatic PDAC (NCT02077881). Although the mechanism may change significantly on different cells, interferon gamma (IFNG/IFNγ)-mediated activation of the transcription factor signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) plays a central role in the up-regulation of immune checkpoint expression, thereby driving adaptive immune resistance.[5] To identify new inhibitors to block IFNG-induced immune checkpoint expression, we screened a protein kinase inhibitor library containing 429 small-molecule compounds in a human PDAC cell line CFPAC1 (harboring hotspot KRAS, TP53, and SMAD4 mutations) by western blot technology .[4] After three dose-dependent (10 μM, 1 μM, and 100 nM) screenings, we determined that dinaciclib ranked the strongest inhibitor to completely block IFNG-induced IDO1 and CD274 protein expression in CFPAC1 cells. Dinaciclib used at 100 nM also limited IFNG-induced the mRNA or protein expression of IDO1 and CD274 in 24 human and mouse cancer cell lines as well as primary cancer cells from patients with PDAC or ovarian cancer. Subsequent RNAi experiments confirmed that the accompanying CDK1/2/5 depletion mimics the effect of dinaciclib on blocking the upregulation of IDO1 and CD274 induced by IFNG. Moreover, combined with RNAi and site mutation technology, we proved that CDK1/2/5-mediated phosphorylation of JUN is necessary for transcriptional upregulation of STAT1, resulting in subsequent STAT1-dependent immune checkpoint expression. These findings reveal a new CDK1/2/5-dependent signal transduction mechanism responsible for immune checkpoint expression, although it is not yet known how IFNG causes CDK1/2/5 activation.

Inducing histone-mediated immunogenic cell death

Most anticancer agents or approaches, including chemotherapy and radiation therapy, can trigger anti-tumor immune response, which mainly depends on the antigenicity of cancer cells and their ability to produce adjuvant signals. In particular, ICD is accompanied by the various types of cell death (e.g., apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis) and can endow dying cancer cells with a powerful adjuvant by exposing or releasing various damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which leads to the recruitment and activation of antigen presentation cells (e.g., dendritic cells) and the subsequent cytotoxic T-cell responses against tumors.[6] Identifying DAMPs in differential cell death modalities seems to be the key to understanding the diversity of ICD in tumor therapy. Histones and their post-translational modifications play a key role in chromatin remodeling and epigenetic regulation. In addition to nuclear functions, histones also act as DAMPs when released into the extracellular space during infection, sterile inflammation, and oxidative stresses .[7] We further provided multiple evidences that indicate that extracellular histones are key DAMPs responsible for IFNG/dinaciclib-induced ICD. First, we observed that IFNG/dinaciclib induced DNA damage and caspase-3-dependent apoptosis, but did not cause other types of cell deaths, which resulted in the release of histones (H3 and H4) and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1, a classic nuclear DAMP). Second, the antibody-mediated neutralization of H3 and H4, but not that of HMGB1, reduced dendritic cell migration and maturation and subsequent T-cell cross priming in response to the supernatants from IFNG/dinaciclib-treated PDAC cells. Third, the preventive tumor vaccination model validated IFNG/dinaciclib-treated KPC cells (a cell line derived from pancreatic tumors of K-Ras mice) were immunogenic in immunocompetent C57BL/6 J mice, and this process was inhibited by the administration of anti-H3 and H4 neutralizing antibodies. Fourth, exposing calreticulin on the surface of dying cells acted as an “eat-me” signal, further enhancing histone-related ICD. Collectively, these findings indicate that extracellular histones play a new role in mediating the anti-tumor immunity of ICD, although in this case its receptor has not been identified.

New drug combination shows promise for pancreatic cancer

Finally, we evaluated the potential utility of dinaciclib in combination with IFNG in the treatment of PDAC in three different preclinical mouse models (subcutaneous, orthotopic, and transgenic models). Compared with IFNG or dinaciclib alone, the administration of IFNG/dinaciclib not only blocked the growth of KPC or PANC02 tumors in subcutaneous models, but also did not cause significant toxicity in C57BL/6 mice. After orthogonally implanting syngeneic KPC cells into the pancreas, IFNG/dinaciclib prolonged the animal survival of C57BL/6 mice. Intracellular HMGB1 is a potential tumor suppressor of PDAC and the conditional depletion of pancreatic Hmgb1 (Pdx1-Cre;K-Ras, termed KCH mice) can significantly promote the initiation and progression of Kras-driven PDAC in mice.[8] Using this KCH model, we further observed that IFNG/dinaciclib prolonged animal survival and inhibited the development of Kras-driven PDAC. In these three different preclinical mouse models of PDAC, the use of IFNG/dinaciclib increased the induction of apoptosis and infiltration of CD8+ T cells (instead of CD4+ T, B, and NK cells), whereas inhibited the expression of IDO1 and CD274 in tumor tissues. Importantly, the IFN/dinaciclib-mediated tumor suppression in subcutaneous or orthotopic models was diminished by the administration of anti-CD8–depleting antibodies. Together, these animal studies establish that the anti-cancer activity of IFNG/dinaciclib requires CD8+ T cells.

Conclusion and outlook

In summary, we reported that the CDK1/2/5 targeted drug dinaciclib has a powerful immunostimulatory effect by suppressing the expression of immune checkpoints and simultaneously inducing immunogenic cell death (Figure 1).[4] The properties of dinaciclib are different from previously reported CDK4/6 inhibitors that stabilize the CD274 protein in certain cancers (breast cancer, colon cancer or melanoma),[9] although CDK4/6 inhibition can enhance chemotherapy and anticancer activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in preclinical models.[9] These different mechanisms mediated by different CDK family members also indicate that either the down-regulation or the up-regulation of immune checkpoints can be used as a combination therapy strategy in clinical trials. Further analysis of the immunomodulatory effects of targeted anticancer agents, including CDK inhibitors, is not only important for understanding the activity and side effects of drugs, but also may provide new clues for the development of potential immunochemotherapy approaches.[10]
  10 in total

Review 1.  Immunostimulation with chemotherapy in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Juliette Humeau; Aitziber Buqué; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  Checkpoint inhibitors in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Henriksen; Anne Dyhl-Polk; Inna Chen; Dorte Nielsen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 4.  The tumour microenvironment in pancreatic cancer - clinical challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Won Jin Ho; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Lei Zheng
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Broadening the Impact of Immunotherapy to Pancreatic Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Vinod P Balachandran; Gregory L Beatty; Stephanie K Dougan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Release and activity of histone in diseases.

Authors:  R Chen; R Kang; X-G Fan; D Tang
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 8.469

7.  Intracellular HMGB1 as a novel tumor suppressor of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Rui Kang; Yangchun Xie; Qiuhong Zhang; Wen Hou; Qingping Jiang; Shan Zhu; Jinbao Liu; Dexing Zeng; Haichao Wang; David L Bartlett; Timothy R Billiar; Herbert J Zeh; Michael T Lotze; Daolin Tang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 25.617

8.  CDK1/2/5 inhibition overcomes IFNG-mediated adaptive immune resistance in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jin Huang; Pan Chen; Ke Liu; Jiao Liu; Borong Zhou; Runliu Wu; Qiu Peng; Ze-Xian Liu; Changfeng Li; Guido Kroemer; Michael Lotze; Herbert Zeh; Rui Kang; Daolin Tang
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Cyclin D-CDK4 kinase destabilizes PD-L1 via cullin 3-SPOP to control cancer immune surveillance.

Authors:  Jinfang Zhang; Xia Bu; Haizhen Wang; Yasheng Zhu; Yan Geng; Naoe Taira Nihira; Yuyong Tan; Yanpeng Ci; Fei Wu; Xiangpeng Dai; Jianping Guo; Yu-Han Huang; Caoqi Fan; Shancheng Ren; Yinghao Sun; Gordon J Freeman; Piotr Sicinski; Wenyi Wei
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Consensus guidelines for the definition, detection and interpretation of immunogenic cell death.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Ilio Vitale; Sarah Warren; Sandy Adjemian; Patrizia Agostinis; Aitziber Buqué Martinez; Timothy A Chan; George Coukos; Sandra Demaria; Eric Deutsch; Dobrin Draganov; Richard L Edelson; Silvia C Formenti; Jitka Fucikova; Lucia Gabriele; Udo S Gaipl; Sofia R Gameiro; Abhishek D Garg; Encouse Golden; Jian Han; Kevin J Harrington; Akseli Hemminki; James W Hodge; Dewan Md Sakib Hossain; Tim Illidge; Michael Karin; Howard L Kaufman; Oliver Kepp; Guido Kroemer; Juan Jose Lasarte; Sherene Loi; Michael T Lotze; Gwenola Manic; Taha Merghoub; Alan A Melcher; Karen L Mossman; Felipe Prosper; Øystein Rekdal; Maria Rescigno; Chiara Riganti; Antonella Sistigu; Mark J Smyth; Radek Spisek; John Stagg; Bryan E Strauss; Daolin Tang; Kazuki Tatsuno; Stefaan W van Gool; Peter Vandenabeele; Takahiro Yamazaki; Dmitriy Zamarin; Laurence Zitvogel; Alessandra Cesano; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 13.751

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Mutational profiling of low-grade gliomas identifies prognosis and immunotherapy-related biomarkers and tumour immune microenvironment characteristics.

Authors:  Wen-Wen Lin; Guan-Yong Ou; Wei-Jiang Zhao
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 5.310

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.