| Literature DB >> 33536788 |
Lin Jin1, Yue Luo1, Ying-Chun Zhao1, Hai Tao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although miRNA-183-5p plays a critical role in many cancer types, including gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, renal cell cancer and breast cancer, its role in osteosarcoma remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; miR-183-5p; osteosarcoma; prognosis; progression
Year: 2021 PMID: 33536788 PMCID: PMC7850385 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S285909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Figure 1Upregulation of miR-183-5p expression in osteosarcoma tissues and cell lines. (A) Relative expression of miR-183-5p in 80 pairs of tumor tissues and adjacent normal tissues determined by qRT-PCR. (B) Relative expression of miR-183-5p in tumor tissues with or without lung metastasis determined by qRT-PCR. (C) Relative expression of miR-183-5p in osteosarcoma cells determined by qRT-PCR. ***P< 0.001; qRT-PCR, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
The Relationship Between miR-183-5p Expression and Clinical Features in Patients with Osteosarcoma
| Variables | Cases (n=80) | miR-183-5p, n (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low Expression (n=40) | High Expression (n=40) | |||
| Age, years | 0.651 | |||
| <18 | 46 (57.5) | 24 (60.0) | 22 (55.0) | |
| ≥18 | 34 (42.5) | 16 (40.0) | 18 (45.0) | |
| Gender | 0.822 | |||
| Male | 45 (56.3) | 22 (55.0) | 23 (57.5) | |
| Female | 35 (43.8) | 18 (45.0) | 17 (42.5) | |
| Location | 0.606 | |||
| Femur/Tibia | 60 (75.0) | 29 (72.5) | 31 (77.5) | |
| Others | 20 (25.0) | 11 (27.5) | 9 (22.5) | |
| Tumor size, cm | ||||
| <5 | 33 (41.3) | 22 (55.0) | 11 (27.5) | |
| ≥5 | 47 (58.8) | 18 (45.0) | 29 (72.5) | |
| TNM stage | ||||
| I–II | 33 (41.3) | 23 (57.5) | 10 (25.0) | |
| III–IV | 47 (58.8) | 17 (42.5) | 30 (75.0) | |
| Lung metastasis | ||||
| Yes | 31 (38.8) | 9 (22.5) | 22 (55.0) | |
| No | 49 (61.3) | 31 (77.5) | 18 (45.0) | |
Note: The bold values denote P-value less than 0.05 with statistical significance.
Figure 2Osteosarcoma patients with high miR-183-5p expression (miR-183-5p high, n= 40) had worse overall survival (A) and recurrence-free survival (B) than those with low miR-183-5p expression (miR-183-5p low, n= 40).
Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Prognostic Factors Associated with Overall Survival
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Age (<18 vs ≥18 years) | 1.01 (0.73–1.65) | 0.621 | ||
| Gender (male vs female) | 0.97 (0.42–1.79) | 0.678 | ||
| Location (femur/tibia vs others) | 1.06 (0.55–2.04) | 0.763 | ||
| Tumor size (≥5 vs <5 cm) | 1.34 (0.86–2.05) | 0.065 | ||
| TNM stage (III–IV vs I–II) | 2.67 (1.64–4.34) | 2.21 (1.23–3.94) | ||
| Lung metastasis (yes vs no) | 1.65 (1.10–2.47) | 1.61 (1.06–2.34) | ||
| miR-183-5p expression (high vs low) | 1.82 (1.21–2.73) | 1.72 (1.16–2.69) | ||
Note: The bold values denote P-value less than 0.05 with statistical significance.
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Prognostic Factors Associated with Recurrence-Free Survival
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Age (<18 vs ≥18 years) | 1.23 (0.97–1.57) | 0.098 | ||
| Gender (male vs female) | 1.12 (0.83–1.51) | 0.444 | ||
| Location (femur/tibia vs others) | 1.21 (0.92–1.60) | 0.168 | ||
| Tumor size (≥5 vs <5 cm) | 1.21 (0.76–2.15) | 0.135 | ||
| TNM stage (III–IV vs I–II) | 1.97 (1.53–2.54) | 2.01 (1.54, 2.63) | ||
| Lung metastasis (yes vs no) | 1.35 (1.12–1.69) | 1.28 (1.04–1.65) | ||
| miR-183-5p expression (high vs low) | 1.71 (1.25–2.32) | 1.65 (1.17–2.15) | ||
Note: The bold values denote P-value less than 0.05 with statistical significance.
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 3MiR-183-5p overexpression promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion capacity of osteosarcoma cells. (A) Expression of miR-183-5p detected in HOS and U2OS cells after transfection with miR-183-5p mimics and negative controls. (B) Effect of miR-183-5p overexpression on the proliferation of HOS and U2OS cells assessed by CCK-8 assays. (C) Effect of miR-183-5p overexpression on the proliferation of HOS and U2OS cells assessed by crystal violet assays; the OD values of crystal violet assays was shown in right panel. (D) Effects of miR-183-5p overexpression on the migration of HOS and U2OS cells assessed by transwell assays (magnification: 400×); the calculation of cells that migrated through the filter was shown in right panel. (E) Effects of miR-183-5p overexpression on the invasion of HOS and U2OS cells assessed by transwell assays (magnification: 400×); the calculation of cells that invaded through the filter was shown in right panel. **P< 0.01; ***P< 0.001. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 4Knockdown of miR-183-5p inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion capacity of osteosarcoma cells. (A) Expression of miR-183-5p detected in HOS and U2OS cells after transfection with miR-183-5p inhibitor and negative controls. (B) Effect of miR-183-5p knockdown on the proliferation of HOS and U2OS cells assessed by CCK-8 assays. (C) Effect of miR-183-5p knockdown on the proliferation of HOS and U2OS cells assessed by crystal violet assays; the OD values of crystal violet assays was shown in right panel. (D) Effects of miR-183-5p knockdown on the migration of HOS and U2OS cells assessed by transwell assays (magnification: 400×); the calculation of cells that migrated through the filter was shown in right panel. (E) Effects of miR-183-5p knockdown on the invasion of HOS and U2OS cells assessed by transwell assays (magnification: 400×); the calculation of cells that invaded through the filter was shown in right panel. *P< 0.05; **P< 0.01; ***P< 0.001. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments.