| Literature DB >> 33536766 |
Hongmao Liu1,2,3, Hailong Lin1,2,3, Zhewei Sun2,3, Xinyi Zhu1,2,3, Xueya Zhang1,2,3, Qiaoling Li1,2,3, Junwan Lu2,3, Xi Lin2,3, Li Lin1,3, Kewei Li2,3, Mei Zhu4, Qiyu Bao2,3, Teng Xu5, Yunliang Hu1,2,3, Hailin Zhang1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to characterize the dissemination mechanism and genetic context of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) genes in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) isolates.Entities:
Keywords: CRKP; KPC-Kp; ST11; Tn1721; blaKPC-2; carbapenemase
Year: 2021 PMID: 33536766 PMCID: PMC7847768 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S290434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Dendrogram of XbaI-digested genomic DNA of 40 KPC-Kp isolates. Five different clusters were identified based on 85% similarity of PFGE profiles. An asterisk (*) indicates that the blaKPC-2 plasmid in the strain was transferable by conjugation.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Results of Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from 2015 to 2017 (mg/L)
| Antibiotics | Range | MIC50 | MIC90 | MIC Interpretation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S (%) | I (%) | R (%) | ||||
| Ceftazidimea | 16–256 | 64 | 256 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Ceftazidime/avibactamb | 0.5–16 | 2 | 2 | 97.5 | 0 | 2.5 |
| Cefotaximea | 8–512 | 256 | 512 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Cefepimea | 16–256 | 256 | >256 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Aztreonama | 128–1,024 | 1,024 | >1,024 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Imipenema | 8–512 | 32 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Meropenema | 4–1,024 | 32 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Ertapenema | 32–1,024 | 512 | 512 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Gentamicina | 0.25–1,024 | 128 | 512 | 37.5 | 0 | 62.5 |
| Tobramycina | 0.25–1,024 | 128 | 512 | 37.5 | 5 | 57.5 |
| Amikacina | 0.125–1,024 | 1,024 | >1,024 | 42.5 | 0 | 57.5 |
| Ciprofloxacina | 16–256 | 32 | 128 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Levofloxacina | 8–128 | 32 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Fosfomycina | 32–1,024 | 512 | 1,024 | 5 | 10 | 85 |
| Chloramphenicola | 2–512 | 512 | 512 | 20 | 2.5 | 77.5 |
| Tigecyclineb | 0.5–32 | 2 | 8 | 80 | 12.5 | 7.5 |
| Colistinb | 0.25–2 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Notes: aThe antimicrobial susceptibility test of these antibiotics was conducted by the agar diffusion method and interpreted by CLSI criteria; bFor colistin, tigecycline and ceftazidime/avibactam, the antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed using broth microdilution method and interpreted by EUCAST criteria.
Abbreviations: S, susceptible; I, intermediate; R, resistant.
Resistance Genes and Carbapenem MIC Levels (mg/L) of Wild Strains and Transconjugants
| Strains | β-Lactam Genes | ETA | MEM | IPM | Replicon Types | ST Types |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KP1878 | 512 | 256 | 64 | IncFII | 11 | |
| pKPC1878/EC600 | 16 | 8 | 4 | IncFII | - | |
| KP1880 | 256 | 128 | 32 | IncFII, IncFIIK | 11 | |
| pKPC1880/EC600 | 4 | 2 | 2 | IncFII | - | |
| KP2159 | 32 | 8 | 8 | IncFIA, IncFIIK | 656 | |
| pKPC2159/EC600 | 8 | 2 | 2 | IncFIIK | - | |
| KP3020 | 64 | 64 | 32 | IncFIIK | 15 | |
| pKPC3020-124/EC600 | 8 | 2 | 2 | IncFIIK | - | |
| KP4603 | 512 | 256 | 64 | IncFII, IncFIIK | 11 | |
| pKPC4603/EC600 | 16 | 4 | 4 | IncFIIK | - | |
| EC600 | - | 0.0075 | 0.03 | 0.015 | - | - |
Abbreviations: ETA, ertapenem; MEM, meropenem; IPM, imipenem.
Figure 2Circular map of the plasmid pKPC3020-124 and comparative genomics analysis with its humongous plasmids. Counting from the center toward outside: (1) the scale in bp. (2) GC skew (G-C/G+C), with a positive GC skew toward the outside and a negative GC skew toward the inside. (3) GC content, with an average of 50%, whereby a G+C content of more than 50% is shown toward the outside, otherwise, inward. (4) Functional regions of multidrug resistance, conjugation, maintenance and unknown function. (5) Genes encoded in the leading strand (outwards) or the lagging strand (inwards). The plasmid pKPC3020-124 (CP061355) was used as the reference sequence and was compared to the sequences of (6) pBK34397 (KU295132.1), (7) p628-KPC (KP987218.1), (8) pKPHS2 (CP003224.1) and (9) pS1-KPC2 (MN615880.1). Genes with different functions are shown in different colors: red, antibiotic resistance; blue, mobile genetic elements; orange, transfer conjugation; light green, plasmid stability and replication; brown, heavy metal resistance; pink, toxin-antitoxin system; yellow, DNA metabolism; and gray, hypothetical proteins/genes with unknown functions.
Figure 3Comparison of the blaKPC-2-encoding regions between 10 representative plasmid sequences. The arrows represent the direction of transcription. ORFs are depicted by arrows and are colored based on predicted gene function. Light blue shading denotes homology of regions in each adjacent plasmid. The blaKPC-2 genes are shown in red.