Literature DB >> 33536574

Reproducibility of scoring criteria for HER2 immunohistochemistry in endometrial serous carcinoma: a multi-institutional interobserver agreement study.

Natalia Buza1, Elizabeth D Euscher2, Xavier Matias-Guiu3, Austin McHenry4, Esther Oliva5, Zehra Ordulu5, Carlos Parra-Herran6, Douglas Rottmann4, Bradley M Turner7, Serena Wong4, Pei Hui4.   

Abstract

Targeted anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy has recently been proven to improve progression-free and overall survival of patients with advanced stage or recurrent endometrial serous carcinoma. To date, no specific pathology HER2 testing or scoring guidelines exist for endometrial cancer. However, based on evidence from the recent successful clinical trial and comprehensive pre-trial pathologic studies, a new set of HER2 scoring criteria have been proposed for endometrial serous carcinoma-distinct from the existing breast and gastric cancer-specific criteria. We present the first study assessing interobserver agreement of HER2 scores using the proposed serous endometrial cancer-specific scoring system. A digitally scanned set of 40 HER2-immunostained slides of endometrial serous carcinoma were sent to seven gynecologic pathologists, who independently assigned HER2 scores for each slide following a brief tutorial. Follow-up fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER2 gene amplification was performed on cases with interobserver disagreement when a 2+ HER2 score was assigned by at least one observer. Complete agreement of HER2 scores among all 7 observers was achieved on 15 cases, and all but one case had an agreement by at least 4 observers. The overall agreement was 72.3% (kappa 0.60), 77.5% (kappa 0.65), and 83.3% (kappa 0.65), using four (0 to 3+ ), three (0/1+ , 2+ , 3+ ), or two (0/1+ , 2/3+ ) HER2 scoring categories, respectively. Based on the combination of HER2 immunostaining scores and FISH, the interobserver disagreement may have potentially resulted in a clinically significant difference in HER2 status only in three tumors. We conclude, that the proposed serous endometrial cancer-specific HER2 scoring criteria are reproducible among gynecologic pathologists with moderate to substantial interobserver agreement rates comparable to those of previously reported in breast and gastric carcinomas. Our findings significantly strengthen the foundation for establishing endometrial cancer-specific HER2 scoring guidelines in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33536574     DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00746-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  2 in total

Review 1.  Current Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers for Endometrial Cancer in Clinical Practice: Recommendations/Proposal from the Italian Study Group.

Authors:  Gian Franco Zannoni; Emma Bragantini; Francesca Castiglione; Matteo Fassan; Giancarlo Troncone; Frediano Inzani; Anna Pesci; Angela Santoro; Filippo Fraggetta
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Performance of a HER2 testing algorithm specific for p53-abnormal endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Lisa Vermij; Naveena Singh; Alicia Leon-Castillo; Nanda Horeweg; Jan Oosting; Joseph Carlson; Vincent Smit; Blake Gilks; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.087

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.