Literature DB >> 33536482

Vibration direction sensitivity of the cochlea with bone conduction stimulation in guinea pigs.

Mingduo Zhao1, Anders Fridberger1, Stefan Stenfelt2.   

Abstract

Sound and vibrations that cause the skull bone to vibrate can be heard as ordinary sounds and this is termed hearing by bone conduction (BC). Not all mechanisms that causes a skull vibration to result in BC hearing are known, and one such unknown is how the direction of the vibration influences BC hearing. This direction sensitivity was investigated by providing BC stimulation in five different directions at the vertex of the guinea pig skull. The hearing thresholds for BC stimulation was obtained in the frequency range of 2 to 20 kHz by measurements of compound action potential. During the stimulation by BC, the vibration of the cochlear promontory was measured with a three-dimensional laser Doppler vibrometer resulting in a set of unique three-dimensional velocity magnitude combinations for each threshold estimation. The sets of three-dimensional velocity magnitude at threshold were used to investigate nine different predictors of BC hearing based on cochlear promontory velocity magnitudes, six single direction (x, y and z directions in isolation, the normal to the stapes footplate, the oval to round window direction, and the cochlear base to apex direction), one linear combination of the three dimension velocity magnitudes, one square-rooted sum of the squared velocity magnitudes, and one sum of the weighted three dimensional velocity magnitudes based on a restricted minimum square error (MSE) estimation. The MSE gave the best predictions of the hearing threshold based on the cochlear promontory velocity magnitudes while using only a single direction gave the worst predictions of the hearing thresholds overall. According to the MSE estimation, at frequencies up to 8 kHz the vibration direction between the right and left side gave the greatest contribution to BC hearing in the guinea pig while at the highest frequencies measured, 16 and 20 kHz, the anteroposterior direction of the guinea pig head gave the greatest contribution.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33536482     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82268-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  9 in total

1.  Interaction between osseous and non-osseous vibratory stimulation of the human cadaveric head.

Authors:  J H Sim; I Dobrev; R Gerig; F Pfiffner; S Stenfelt; A M Huber; C Röösli
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Model predictions for bone conduction perception in the human.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Acoustic and physiologic aspects of bone conduction hearing.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-08

4.  Experimental investigation of promontory motion and intracranial pressure following bone conduction: Stimulation site and coupling type dependence.

Authors:  Ivo Dobrev; Jae Hoon Sim; Flurin Pfiffner; Alexander M Huber; Christof Röösli
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Simulation of the power transmission of bone-conducted sound in a finite-element model of the human head.

Authors:  You Chang; Namkeun Kim; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2018-07-17

6.  Magnitude and phase of three-dimensional (3D) velocity vector: Application to measurement of cochlear promontory motion during bone conduction sound transmission.

Authors:  Ivo Dobrev; Jae Hoon Sim
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Bone conduction hearing in the Guinea pig and the effect of artificially induced middle ear lesions.

Authors:  Mingduo Zhao; Anders Fridberger; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 8.  Inner ear contribution to bone conduction hearing in the human.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Transmission of bone conducted sound - correlation between hearing perception and cochlear vibration.

Authors:  Måns Eeg-Olofsson; Stefan Stenfelt; Hamidreza Taghavi; Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Tomas Tengstrand; Caterina Finizia
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Review of Whole Head Experimental Cochlear Promontory Vibration with Bone Conduction Stimulation and Investigation of Experimental Setup Effects.

Authors:  Srdjan Prodanovic; Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  Effects of Stimulation Position and Frequency Band on Auditory Spatial Perception with Bilateral Bone Conduction.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Xikun Lu; Jinqiu Sang; Juanjuan Cai; Chengshi Zheng
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.