Literature DB >> 33536471

Quantifying lumbar vertebral perfusion by a Tofts model on DCE-MRI using segmental versus aortic arterial input function.

Yi-Jui Liu1,2, Hou-Ting Yang3,4, Melissa Min-Szu Yao5,6, Shao-Chieh Lin3, Der-Yang Cho7, Wu-Chung Shen8,9, Chun-Jung Juan10,11,12, Wing P Chan13,14.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of arterial input function (AIF) selection on the quantification of vertebral perfusion using axial dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). In this study, axial DCE-MRI was performed on 2 vertebrae in each of eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 36.9 years; 5 men) using a 1.5-T scanner. The pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans, ve, and vp, derived using a Tofts model on axial DCE-MRI of the lumbar vertebrae, were evaluated using various AIFs: the population-based aortic AIF (AIF_PA), a patient-specific aortic AIF (AIF_A) and a patient-specific segmental arterial AIF (AIF_SA). Additionally, peaks and delay times were changed to simulate the effects of various AIFs on the calculation of perfusion parameters. Nonparametric analyses including the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Kruskal-Wallis test with a Dunn-Bonferroni post hoc analysis were performed. In simulation, Ktrans and ve increased as the peak in the AIF decreased, but vp increased when delay time in the AIF increased. In humans, the estimated Ktrans and ve were significantly smaller using AIF_A compared to AIF_SA no matter the computation style (pixel-wise or region-of-interest based). Both these perfusion parameters were significantly greater using AIF_SA compared to AIF_A.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33536471     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82300-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  25 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion and perfusion MRI: basic physics.

Authors:  R Luypaert; S Boujraf; S Sourbron; M Osteaux
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Origins of the segmental arteries in the aorta: an anatomic study for selective catheterization with spinal arteriography.

Authors:  Satoru Shimizu; Ryusui Tanaka; Shinichi Kan; Sachio Suzuki; Akira Kurata; Kiyotaka Fujii
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation.

Authors:  James F Griffith; David K W Yeung; Gregory E Antonio; Samuel Y S Wong; Timothy C Y Kwok; Jean Woo; Ping C Leung
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of osseous spine metastasis before and 1 hour after high-dose image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Eric Lis; Atin Saha; Kyung K Peck; Joan Zatcky; Michael J Zelefsky; Yoshiya Yamada; Andrei I Holodny; Mark H Bilsky; Sasan Karimi
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.047

5.  Quantitative analysis of vertebral bone marrow perfusion using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: initial results in osteoporotic patients with acute vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Andreas Biffar; Gerwin P Schmidt; Steven Sourbron; Melvin D'Anastasi; Olaf Dietrich; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Maximilian F Reiser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Influence of amplitude-related perfusion parameters in the parotid glands by non-fat-saturated dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Su-Chin Chiu; Cheng-Chieh Cheng; Hing-Chiu Chang; Hsiao-Wen Chung; Hui-Chu Chiu; Yi-Jui Liu; Hsian-He Hsu; Chun-Jung Juan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Characterizing hypervascular and hypovascular metastases and normal bone marrow of the spine using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  N R Khadem; S Karimi; K K Peck; Y Yamada; E Lis; J Lyo; M Bilsky; H A Vargas; A I Holodny
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Compromised bone marrow perfusion in osteoporosis.

Authors:  James F Griffith; David K W Yeung; Polly H Tsang; Kai C Choi; Timothy C Y Kwok; Anil T Ahuja; Kwok S Leung; Ping C Leung
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Intervertebral disk degeneration related to reduced vertebral marrow perfusion at dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Yi-Jui Liu; Guo-Shu Huang; Chun-Jung Juan; Min-Szu Yao; Wei-Pin Ho; Wing P Chan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.