Isabel Gómez-Redondo1, Benjamín Planells2, Sebastián Cánovas3,4, Elena Ivanova5, Gavin Kelsey5,6, Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán2. 1. Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Madrid, Spain. igomer00@gmail.com. 2. Department of Animal Reproduction, INIA, Madrid, Spain. 3. Physiology of Reproduction Group, Department of Physiology, Universidad de Murcia, Campus Mare Nostrum, Murcia, Spain. 4. Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria, IMIB-Arrixaca-UMU, Murcia, Spain. 5. Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK. 6. Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prior work in mice has shown that some retrotransposed elements remain substantially methylated during DNA methylation reprogramming of germ cells. In the pig, however, information about this process is scarce. The present study was designed to examine the methylation profiles of porcine germ cells during the time course of epigenetic reprogramming. RESULTS: Sows were artificially inseminated, and their fetuses were collected 28, 32, 36, 39, and 42 days later. At each time point, genital ridges were dissected from the mesonephros and germ cells were isolated through magnetic-activated cell sorting using an anti-SSEA-1 antibody, and recovered germ cells were subjected to whole-genome bisulphite sequencing. Methylation levels were quantified using SeqMonk software by performing an unbiased analysis, and persistently methylated regions (PMRs) in each sex were determined to extract those regions showing 50% or more methylation. Most genomic elements underwent a dramatic loss of methylation from day 28 to day 36, when the lowest levels were shown. By day 42, there was evidence for the initiation of genomic re-methylation. We identified a total of 1456 and 1122 PMRs in male and female germ cells, respectively, and large numbers of transposable elements (SINEs, LINEs, and LTRs) were found to be located within these PMRs. Twenty-one percent of the introns located in these PMRs were found to be the first introns of a gene, suggesting their regulatory role in the expression of these genes. Interestingly, most of the identified PMRs were demethylated at the blastocyst stage. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that methylation reprogramming in pig germ cells follows the general dynamics shown in mice and human, unveiling genomic elements that behave differently between male and female germ cells.
BACKGROUND: Prior work in mice has shown that some retrotransposed elements remain substantially methylated during DNA methylation reprogramming of germ cells. In the pig, however, information about this process is scarce. The present study was designed to examine the methylation profiles of porcine germ cells during the time course of epigenetic reprogramming. RESULTS: Sows were artificially inseminated, and their fetuses were collected 28, 32, 36, 39, and 42 days later. At each time point, genital ridges were dissected from the mesonephros and germ cells were isolated through magnetic-activated cell sorting using an anti-SSEA-1 antibody, and recovered germ cells were subjected to whole-genome bisulphite sequencing. Methylation levels were quantified using SeqMonk software by performing an unbiased analysis, and persistently methylated regions (PMRs) in each sex were determined to extract those regions showing 50% or more methylation. Most genomic elements underwent a dramatic loss of methylation from day 28 to day 36, when the lowest levels were shown. By day 42, there was evidence for the initiation of genomic re-methylation. We identified a total of 1456 and 1122 PMRs in male and female germ cells, respectively, and large numbers of transposable elements (SINEs, LINEs, and LTRs) were found to be located within these PMRs. Twenty-one percent of the introns located in these PMRs were found to be the first introns of a gene, suggesting their regulatory role in the expression of these genes. Interestingly, most of the identified PMRs were demethylated at the blastocyst stage. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that methylation reprogramming in pig germ cells follows the general dynamics shown in mice and human, unveiling genomic elements that behave differently between male and female germ cells.
Authors: Shawn Yost; Bas de Wolf; Sandra Hanks; Anna Zachariou; Chiara Marcozzi; Matthew Clarke; Richarda de Voer; Banafsheh Etemad; Esther Uijttewaal; Emma Ramsay; Harriet Wylie; Anna Elliott; Susan Picton; Audrey Smith; Sarah Smithson; Sheila Seal; Elise Ruark; Gunnar Houge; Jonathan Pines; Geert J P L Kops; Nazneen Rahman Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Benjamín Planells; Isabel Gómez-Redondo; José María Sánchez; Michael McDonald; Ángela Cánovas; Patrick Lonergan; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Petra Hajkova; Sean J Jeffries; Caroline Lee; Nigel Miller; Stephen P Jackson; M Azim Surani Journal: Science Date: 2010-07-02 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Peter W S Hill; Harry G Leitch; Cristina E Requena; Zhiyi Sun; Rachel Amouroux; Monica Roman-Trufero; Malgorzata Borkowska; Jolyon Terragni; Romualdas Vaisvila; Sarah Linnett; Hakan Bagci; Gopuraja Dharmalingham; Vanja Haberle; Boris Lenhard; Yu Zheng; Sriharsa Pradhan; Petra Hajkova Journal: Nature Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jamie A Hackett; James P Reddington; Colm E Nestor; Donncha S Dunican; Miguel R Branco; Judith Reichmann; Wolf Reik; M Azim Surani; Ian R Adams; Richard R Meehan Journal: Development Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Stefanie Seisenberger; Simon Andrews; Felix Krueger; Julia Arand; Jörn Walter; Fátima Santos; Christian Popp; Bernard Thienpont; Wendy Dean; Wolf Reik Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 17.970