Literature DB >> 33535993

Tobacco use and betel quid chewing among adults in Myanmar- estimates and social determinants from demographic and health survey, 2015-16.

Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy1, Saint Nway Aye2, Sunil Pazhayanur Venkateswaran2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National-level prevalence of tobacco use and betel quid chewing, and associated socio-demographic factors were estimated using first-ever, Myanmar Demographic Health Survey, 2015-16.
METHODS: Questions about tobacco smoking, smokeless tobacco use, and betel quid chewing were used to create outcome variables such as tobacco smoking, smokeless tobacco use, and 'dual use' (tobacco use and betel quid chewing). Sex-stratified weighted prevalence rates, distribution by socio-demographic factors were presented. Association of demographic factors with tobacco and/or betel quid chewing was assessed by multinomial logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among men, prevalence (%) of tobacco use and betel quid chewing was 40.9 (95% CI 38.1, 42.1) and 58.9 (95% CI 56.3, 61.6) respectively. Among women tobacco use was 3.7 (95% CI 2.0, 4.3) and betel quid chewing 18.2 (95% CI 16.4, 20.0). Among men prevalence of either tobacco or betel quid and 'dual use' was 50.4 (95% CI 48.5, 52.3) and 25.0 (95% CI 23.1, 26.8) respectively, whereas among women the corresponding rates were 17.9 (95% CI 16.2, 19.6) and 2.0 (95% CI 1.6, 2.9). Smokeless tobacco use was low (< 5%) in both sexes. Tobacco use and/or betel quid chewing was associated with age, wealth, marital status, and occupation in both sexes. However, the effect sizes were much larger among women for wealth groups. People of older age and lower wealth had a higher odds of being a tobacco user and/or betel quid chewer.
CONCLUSIONS: In Myanmar, prevalence of both tobacco use and betel quid chewing was high particularly among men. Tobacco control interventions should be strictly implemented and 'dual use' of both tobacco and betel quid should also be urgently addressed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Betel quid chewing; Myanmar; Prevalence; Tobacco use

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33535993      PMCID: PMC7860247          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10347-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  25 in total

1.  Betel Nut (areca) and Smokeless Tobacco Use in Myanmar.

Authors:  Roger L Papke; Indraneel Bhattacharyya; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Ingyin Moe; Sam Glatman
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.164

Review 2.  Betel quid chewing without tobacco: a meta-analysis of carcinogenic and precarcinogenic effects.

Authors:  Han Song; Yi Wan; Yong-Yong Xu
Journal:  Asia Pac J Public Health       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 1.399

Review 3.  Betel nut chewing and its deleterious effects on oral cavity.

Authors:  Richa Anand; Chandan Dhingra; Sumanth Prasad; Ipseeta Menon
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.805

4.  Global Patterns and Determinants of Sex Differences in Smoking.

Authors:  Fred C Pampel
Journal:  Int J Comp Sociol       Date:  2006-12

5.  PREVALENCE AND FACTORS INFLUENCING BETEL NUT CHEWING AMONG ADULTS IN WEST INSEIN TOWNSHIP, YANGON, MYANMAR.

Authors:  Su Kyaw Myint; Kulaya Narksawat; Jutatip Sillabutra
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.267

6.  Evolution of the Global Tobacco Surveillance System (GTSS) 1998-2008.

Authors:  Charles W Warren; Juliette Lee; Veronica Lea; Ann Goding; Brandon O'Hara; Michelle Carlberg; Samira Asma; Matthew McKenna
Journal:  Glob Health Promot       Date:  2009-09

Review 7.  Smokeless tobacco use in Myanmar.

Authors:  N N Kyaing; T Sein; A A Sein; M M Than Htike; A Tun; N N N Shein
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.224

8.  Switching to smokeless tobacco, the most common smoking cessation method: results from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey, India.

Authors:  G K Mini; K R Thankappan
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.427

9.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Betel Quid and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders in a Periurban Township in Myanmar.

Authors:  Ko-Ko Zaw; Mya Ohnmar; Moh-Moh Hlaing; Yin-Thet-Nu Oo; Swe-Swe Win; Maung-Maung-Than Htike; Phyu-Phyu Aye; Sein Shwe; Moe-Thida Htwe; Zaw-Moe Thein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.