Literature DB >> 33535979

ACEF performed better than other risk scores in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome during long term follow-up.

Ivica Kristić1, Mislav Vrsalovic2,3, Nikola Crnčević1, Frane Runjić1, Vesna Čapkun4, Ozren Polašek5, Andrija Matetic1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is an important clinical method, but long-term studies on patients subjected to all-treatment strategies are lacking. Therefore, the aim was to compare several established risk scores in the all-treatment NSTE-ACS cohort during long-term follow-up.
METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 276) with NSTE-ACS undergoing coronary angiography were recruited between September 2012 and May 2015. Six risk scores for all patients were calculated, namely GRACE 2.0, ACEF, SYNTAX, Clinical SYNTAX, SYNTAX II PCI and SYNTAX II CABG. The primary end-point was Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) which was a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or urgent coronary revascularization.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 33 months, 64 MACE outcomes were recorded (23.2%). There was no difference between risk score categories, except in the highest risk group of ACEF and SYNTAX II PCI scores which exhibited significantly more MACE (51.6%, N = 33 and 45.3%, N = 29, P = 0.024, respectively). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis of individual variables, only age and atrial fibrillation were significant predictors for MACE (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05, P = 0.023 and HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.04-3.89, P = 0.037, respectively). Furthermore, multivariate analysis of the risk scores showed significant prediction of MACE only with ACEF score (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.36-3.44, P = 0.001). The overall performance of GRACE, SYNTAX, Clinical SYNTAX and SYNTAX II CABG was poor with AUC values of 0.596, 0.507, 0.530 and 0.582, respectively, while ACEF and SYNTAX II PCI showed the best absolute AUC values for MACE (0.630 and 0.626, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: ACEF risk score showed better discrimination than other risk scores in NSTE-ACS patients undergoing all-treatment strategies over long-term follow-up and it could represent a fast and user-friendly tool to stratify NSTE-ACS patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  All-treatment strategies; Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; Risk scores

Year:  2021        PMID: 33535979      PMCID: PMC7860189          DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01841-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord        ISSN: 1471-2261            Impact factor:   2.298


  32 in total

1.  Value of age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF score) in assessing risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the 'All-Comers' LEADERS trial.

Authors:  Joanna J Wykrzykowska; Scot Garg; Yoshinobu Onuma; Ton de Vries; Dick Goedhart; Marie-Angele Morel; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Pawel Buszman; Axel Linke; Thomas Ischinger; Volker Klauss; Roberto Corti; Franz Eberli; William Wijns; Marie-Claude Morice; Carlo di Mario; Robert Jan van Geuns; Peter Juni; Stephan Windecker; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 6.546

2.  Risk of assessing mortality risk in elective cardiac operations: age, creatinine, ejection fraction, and the law of parsimony.

Authors:  Marco Ranucci; Serenella Castelvecchio; Lorenzo Menicanti; Alessandro Frigiola; Gabriele Pelissero
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Predictive value of the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Barbara E Stähli; Manfred B Wischnewsky; Philipp Jakob; Roland Klingenberg; Slayman Obeid; Dik Heg; Lorenz Räber; Stephan Windecker; Marco Roffi; François Mach; Baris Gencer; David Nanchen; Peter Jüni; Ulf Landmesser; Christian M Matter; Thomas F Lüscher; Willibald Maier
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II.

Authors:  Vasim Farooq; David van Klaveren; Ewout W Steyerberg; Emanuele Meliga; Yvonne Vergouwe; Alaide Chieffo; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael Mack; Ted Feldman; Marie-Claude Morice; Elisabeth Ståhle; Yoshinobu Onuma; Marie-angèle Morel; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Gerrit Anne van Es; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Predictive ability of ACEF and ACEF II score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the GLOBAL LEADERS study.

Authors:  Ply Chichareon; Rodrigo Modolo; David van Klaveren; Kuniaki Takahashi; Norihiro Kogame; Chun-Chin Chang; Yuki Katagiri; Mariusz Tomaniak; Taku Asano; Ernest Spitzer; Pawel Buszman; Janusz Prokopczuk; Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi; Ian Buysschaert; Richard Anderson; Keith G Oldroyd; Bela Merkely; Scot Garg; Joanna J Wykrzykowska; Jan J Piek; Peter Jüni; Christian Hamm; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Marco Valgimigli; Pascal Vranckx; Stephan Windecker; Yoshinobu Onuma; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Comparison of clinical and angiographic prognostic risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndromes: Analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY (ACUITY) trial.

Authors:  Tullio Palmerini; Adriano Caixeta; Philippe Genereux; Ecaterina Cristea; Alexandra Lansky; Roxana Mehran; George Dangas; Dana Lazar; Rachel Sanchez; Martin Fahy; Ke Xu; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 7.  Management of Patients With NSTE-ACS: A Comparison of the Recent AHA/ACC and ESC Guidelines.

Authors:  Fatima Rodriguez; Kenneth W Mahaffey
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Meta-Analysis Comparing Established Risk Prediction Models (EuroSCORE II, STS Score, and ACEF Score) for Perioperative Mortality During Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Patrick G Sullivan; Joshua D Wallach; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Risk predictive ability of ACEF score for infection in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Litao Wang; Guangjun Huang; Qunkai Peng; Chongyang Duan; Yining Dai; Shuai Shao; Wei-Wen Zhong; Danqing Yu; Jiyan Chen; Ling Xue; Pengcheng He; Ning Tan; Yuanhui Liu
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 7.804

10.  Gender differences in trends of acute myocardial infarction events: the Northern Sweden MONICA study 1985 - 2004.

Authors:  Dan Lundblad; Lars Holmgren; Jan-Håkan Jansson; Ulf Näslund; Mats Eliasson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 2.298

View more
  1 in total

1.  Predictive value of the age, creatinine and ejection fraction score in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with bail-out tirofiban therapy.

Authors:  Altuğ Ösken; Recep Hacı; Sena Sert Şekerci; Lale Dinç Asarcıklı; Gizem Yüksel; Büşra Ceylan; Şennur Ünal Dayı; Neşe Çam
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.426

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.