| Literature DB >> 33535880 |
Peng-Tao Ji1, Xiang-Ling Li2, Yu-Juan Peng1, Yue-Chen Zhang1, Pei-Jun Tao1.
Abstract
The effects of polyaspartic acid and different controlled-release fertilizers with urea on dry matter accumulation and distribution, nitrogen absorption and accumulation, and the activities of enzymes involved nitrogen metabolism and yield of corn were studied by using xianyu (XY688), a maize nitrogen efficient cultivar, and Jifeng NO.2 (JF2), a maize nitrogen-inefficient cultivar, as experimental materials and through random blocks experimental design in 2019. For XY688, polyaspartic acid chelated nitrogen fertilizer (PASPN) had the highest yield, which was 21.34% higher than N0 treatment. For JF2, it also had the highest yield under PASPN combined urea treatment, which was 23.44% higher than N0 (no nitrogen fertilizer), and JF2 had a 9.7% lower yield under XY688 treatment. For XY688, PASPN treatment had the largest nitrogen uptake in grain, up to 3.14 kg/hm2, and PASPN treatment increased 17.4% compared with N0. For JF2, grain nitrogen uptake was also the highest under PASPN treatment, which was significantly different from other treatments. Nitrogen uptake was 3.16 kg/hm2, which increased 37.4% compared with N0. Compared with JF2, XY688 showed higher nitrogen uptake efficiency, nitrogen utilization efficiency, and partial nitrogen productivity. For XY688, the highest nitrogen absorption efficiency was SU3 (slow-release urea and ordinary urea) treatment (0.36 kg/kg). The partial nitrogen productivity and harvest index of PASPN treatment were the highest and significantly different from other treatments. The partial nitrogen productivity of PASPN treatment was 57.02 kg/kg. These results can provide help for the further researches of the rational utilization and absorption of nitrogen fertilizer.Entities:
Keywords: Polyaspartic acid; controlled-release fertilizer; nitrogen uptake; partial nitrogen productivity; yield
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33535880 PMCID: PMC8806278 DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1865608
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineered ISSN: 2165-5979 Impact factor: 3.269
Figure 1.Yield of XY688 and JF2 under different fertilization ratio (a); Variation trend of dry matter of XY688 at different growing stages (b) and Variation trend of dry matter of JF2 at different growing stages (c)
Dry matter accumulation and ratio of maize in different growth stages
| Treatments | Sowing to jointing | Jointing to silking | Silking to dough | Dough to maturity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | DMA(g/plant) | RTDA% | DMA(g/plant) | RTDA% | DMA(g/plant) | RTDA% | DMA(g/plant) | RTDA% |
| XY688 | PASPN | 9.95 ± 3.48 a | 2.81 | 140.02 ± 6.22 a | 42.40 | 143.09 ± 6.1 b | 40.45 | 60.6 ± 7.5 a | 17.15 |
| N0 | 5.71 ± 1.24 b | 1.79 | 131.14 ± 15.72 b | 42.95 | 140.8 ± 3.1 b | 44.19 | 40.94 ± 1.3 d | 12.85 | |
| N180 | 5.69 ± 0.39 b | 1.68 | 140.94 ± 9.14 a | 43.36 | 147 ± 3.6 b | 43.47 | 44.56 ± 7 c | 13.18 | |
| S180 | 3.27 ± 0.56 c | 0.98 | 134.83 ± 8.73 b | 41.15 | 154.4 ± 1.3 a | 46.00 | 43.11 ± 8.6 c | 12.85 | |
| SU3 | 4.04 ± 0.82 c | 1.17 | 133.24 ± 7.04 b | 39.73 | 157.44 ± 1.8 a | 45.56 | 50.8 ± 9.28 b | 14.72 | |
| SU5 | 3.95 ± 0.45 c | 1.16 | 141.31 ± 14.17 a | 42.60 | 145.36 ± 2.6 b | 42.62 | 50.4 ± 1.1 b | 14.78 | |
| SU7 | 3.8 ± 0.25 | 1.10 | 140.88 ± 6.94 a | 41.76 | 150.86 ± 3.7 a | 39.84 | 50.92 ± 1.9 b | 14.70 | |
| Average | 5.20 | 1.53 | 137.48 | 42 | 148.42 | 43.16 | 48.76 | 14.32 | |
| JF2 | PASPN | 4.56 ± 1.26 a | 1.36 | 142.92 ± 3.84 a | 44.01 | 133.49 ± 7.9 c | 44.58 | 54.12 ± 9.8 a | 16.15 |
| N0 | 4.07 ± 1.29 b | 1.30 | 132.23 ± 5.38 b | 43.52 | 139.64 ± 9.6 c | 45.57 | 44.58 ± 1.0 c | 11.90 | |
| N180 | 4.84 ± 1.09 a | 1.47 | 125.07 ± 4 b | 39.47 | 151.17 ± 5.9 b | 46.62 | 48.05 ± 1.7 c | 14.60 | |
| S180 | 4.23 ± 0.17 b | 1.29 | 128.77 ± 3.83 b | 40.66 | 152.5 ± 2.2 b | 46.75 | 41.64 ± 1.3 c | 12.73 | |
| SU3 | 3.76 ± 0.64 b | 1.15 | 124.77 ± 3.4 b | 39.33 | 152.79 ± 9 b | 52.21 | 45.5 ± 9.8 b | 13.92 | |
| SU5 | 3.69 ± 0.16 b | 1.14 | 115.06 ± 3.09 c | 36.73 | 168.78 ± 5.1 a | 47.79 | 35.75 ± 9.5 d | 11.06 | |
| SU7 | 3.97 ± 0.38 b | 1.16 | 119.21 ± 3.74 c | 36.13 | 162.93 ± 4.8 a | 47.81 | 54.84 ± 1.4 a | 16.09 | |
| Average | 4.16 | 1.27 | 126.85 | 39.98 | 151.61 | 47.33 | 46.35 | 13.78 | |
Different lowercase letters mean significant difference at 0.05 level, while values with the same letter mean insignificant difference.
Nitrogen content in different parts of maize at silking stage and ripening stage
| Cultivar | Treatment | N content at silking (mg/g) | N content at maturity (mg/g) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | Leaf | Stem | Total | Leaf | Stem | Grain | Total |
| XY688 | PASPN | 1.12 ab | 1.99 b | 3.11 ab | 0.48 b | 0.42 b | 3.14 a | 4.05 a |
| N0 | 0.99 b | 1.50 c | 2.50 b | 0.45 b | 0.45 b | 2.47 c | 3.45 c | |
| N180 | 1.20 a | 1.85 b | 3.04 ab | 0.61 a | 0.43 b | 3.00 b | 4.18 a | |
| S180 | 1.03 ab | 1.99 b | 3.03 ab | 0.53 ab | 0.39 b | 2.99 b | 4.02 b | |
| SU3 | 0.85 b | 2.57 a | 3.42 a | 0.49 b | 0.76 b | 3.03 a | 4.31 a | |
| SU5 | 1.18 a | 2.16 b | 3.34 a | 0.47 b | 0.81 a | 2.76 b | 4.08 a | |
| SU7 | 0.82 b | 2.07 b | 2.89 b | 0.35 c | 0.56 b | 2.97 b | 3.96 b | |
| JF2 | PASPN | 0.66 b | 1.70 b | 2.36 b | 0.37 b | 0.48 a | 3.16 a | 4.05 a |
| N0 | 0.96 a | 1.60 b | 2.56 b | 0.53 a | 0.51 a | 2.31 c | 3.37 b | |
| N180 | 0.98 a | 1.80 b | 2.78 a | 0.47 b | 0.42 a | 2.92 ab | 3.98 a | |
| S180 | 0.78 a | 2.06 a | 2.84 a | 0.56 a | 0.46 a | 2.81 b | 3.98 a | |
| SU3 | 0.79 b | 1.96 a | 2.75 a | 0.44 b | 0.47 a | 2.83 b | 3.91 a | |
| SU5 | 0.80 b | 2.06 a | 2.86 a | 0.54 a | 0.31 b | 2.79 b | 3.78 a | |
| SU7 | 0.94 ab | 1.65 b | 2.59 b | 0.55 a | 0.44 a | 2.87 b | 4.00 a | |
Different lowercase letters mean significant difference at 0.05 level, while values with the same letter mean insignificant difference.
Nitrogen accumulation in different organs of maize at Suckling stage and complete stage
| | | Milk stage | Maturity stage | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | Treatments | Leaf (g/plant) | Stem (g/plant) | Ear (g/plant) | Grain (g/plant) | Leaf (g/plant) | Stem (g/plant) | Ear (g/plant) | Grain (g/plant) |
| 688 | PASPN | 0.173 a | 1.164 a | 0.150 bc | 0.311 b | 0.010 d | 0.447 c | 0.012 d | 3.138 a |
| N0 | 0.114 b | 1.104 a | 0.212 a | 0.243 c | 0.027 c | 0.450 c | 0.047 c | 2.501 c | |
| N180 | 0.084 c | 0.983 b | 0.239 a | 0.418 a | 0.071 a | 0.421 c | 0.068 bc | 2.982 c | |
| S180 | 0.066 c | 0.838 b | 0.130 c | 0.334 b | 0.048 b | 0.392 c | 0.066 bc | 3.009 b | |
| SU3 | 0.074 c | 1.062 a | 0.152 bc | 0.423 a | 0.009 d | 0.734 ab | 0.007 d | 3.016 b | |
| SU5 | 0.029 c | 0.965 b | 0.060 d | 0.307 b | 0.008 d | 0.828 ab | 0.046 c | 2.793 c | |
| SU7 | 0.059 c | 1.406 a | 0.166 bc | 0.331 b | 0.018 d | 0.551 b | 0.071 a | 3.005 b | |
| JF2 | PASPN | 0.019 b | 1.198 c | 0.086 b | 0.360 b | 0.035 d | 0.487 b | 0.012 d | 3.002 a |
| N0 | 0.023 a | 1.144 c | 0.020 c | 0.250 c | 0.022 d | 0.502 a | 0.008 d | 2.351 c | |
| N180 | 0.011 b | 1.295 b | 0.012 c | 0.375 b | 0.066 bc | 0.402 c | 0.106 d | 2.830 b | |
| S180 | 0.019 b | 1.287 b | 0.002 d | 0.409 a | 0.054 c | 0.449 c | 0.102 d | 2.690 b | |
| SU3 | 0.007 c | 1.255 bc | 0.065 b | 0.288 c | 0.089 a | 0.478 b | 0.095 a | 2.723 b | |
| SU5 | 0.019 b | 1.322 a | 0.077 b | 0.302 bc | 0.058 c | 0.326 d | 0.082 b | 2.727 b | |
| SU7 | 0.021 a | 0.900 d | 0.121 a | 0.320 b | 0.076 b | 0.453 c | 0.077 c | 2.855 b | |
Different lowercase letters mean significant difference at 0.05 level, while values with the same letter mean insignificant difference.
Effects of different fertilization treatments on Nitrogen uptake and yield
| Cultivar | Treatment | Grain N uptake kg/hm2 | Plant N uptake kg/hm2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| XY688 | PASPN | 3.14 a | 4.05 b |
| N0 | 2.48 c | 3.45 c | |
| N180 | 3 b | 4.19 ab | |
| S180 | 2.98 b | 4.03 b | |
| SU3 | 3.03 ab | 4.31 a | |
| SU5 | 2.76 b | 4.08 ab | |
| SU7 | 2.97 b | 3.96 b | |
| JF2 | PASPN | 3.16 a | 4.05 a |
| N0 | 2.3 c | 3.37 b | |
| N180 | 2.92 b | 3.98 a | |
| S180 | 2.81 b | 3.97 a | |
| SU3 | 2.83 b | 3.91 a | |
| SU5 | 2.79 b | 3.78 a | |
| SU7 | 2.87 b | 3.89 a |
Effects of different fertilization treatments on nitrogen utilization and harvest index
| Cultivar | Treatment | Nitrogen absorption efficiency Kg/kg | Nitrogen efficiency % | Partial factor productivity Kg/kg | Nitrogen harvest index % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XY688 | PASPN | 0.34 b | 42.84 a | 57.02 a | 0.78 a |
| N0 | 0.29 c | 39.59 a | 49.89 c | 0.72 b | |
| N180 | 0.35 ab | 39.76 a | 51.30 c | 0.72 b | |
| S180 | 0.34 b | 40.91 a | 53.80 bc | 0.74 b | |
| SU3 | 0.36 a | 40.70 a | 54.28 b | 0.70 b | |
| SU5 | 0.34 ab | 40.19 a | 53.37 bc | 0.68 b | |
| SU7 | 0.33 b | 44.95 a | 56.83 ab | 0.75 b | |
| JF2 | PASPN | 0.338 a | 41.57 a | 51.47 a | 0.78 a |
| N0 | 0.281 b | 37.49 b | 47.10 c | 0.69 c | |
| N180 | 0.332 a | 39.90 a | 48.42 b | 0.73 b | |
| S180 | 0.331 a | 40.57 a | 48.75 b | 0.71 bc | |
| SU3 | 0.326 a | 40.79 a | 49.17 b | 0.72 bc | |
| SU5 | 0.315 a | 41.85 a | 47.86 b | 0.74 b | |
| SU7 | 0.333 a | 40.76 a | 48.99 b | 0.72 bc |
Figure 2.Effects of different fertilization ratio on nitrate reductase concentration in Maize (a and b) and Effect of different fertilization ratio on the concentration of ALT in Maize (c and d)
Figure 3.Effect of different fertilization ratio on the concentration of ALT in Maize (a and b); and Effects of different fertilization ratio on GLNS concentration in Maize (c and d)