Literature DB >> 33535796

Regional Lymph Node Metastasis on Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Correlates with Decreased Biochemical Recurrence-Free and Therapy-Free Survival after Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Single-Arm Observational Study.

Thomas Amiel1, Christoph Würnschimmel2,3, Matthias Heck1, Thomas Horn1, Noemi Nguyen1, Lars Budäus2, Sophie Knipper2, Mike Wenzel3,4, Isabel Rauscher5, Matthias Eiber5, Hui Wang5, Tobias Maurer2,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to address the impact of preoperative prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) findings prior to radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection on biochemical recurrence and time to adjuvant or salvage treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2017, 64 intermediate and 166 high risk (230) prostate cancer patients received 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET followed by radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Biochemical recurrence-free and therapy-free survivalwere determined. For all time-to-event analyses, univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and univariable Kaplan-Meier analyses were applied, with a significance threshold of p <0.05.
RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of PSMA PET for pN1 disease was 48.5%, 95.7%, 82.1% and 82.2%, respectively. Median followup was 30.2 months. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 50.4% (116) of patients and adjuvant or salvage treatment was performed in 46.5% (107). Worst biochemical recurrence-free and therapy-free survival was observed in pN1 patients who also exhibited PSMA PET positive lymph node, followed by pN1 patients without PSMA PET positive lymph node and patients without evidence of lymph node metastasis on histology and PSMA PET (median biochemical recurrence-free survival 1.7 vs. 7.5 vs. >36 months, median therapy-free survival 2.6 vs. 8.9 vs. >36 months).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with positive lymph node on PSMA PET prior to radical prostatectomy have to expect early biochemical recurrence and adjuvant/salvage therapy, despite thorough pelvic lymph node dissection. Therefore, results from PSMA PET can be used for patients' consultation and more stringent followup as well as for planning of neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lymph node dissection; neoplasm staging; positron emission tomograpy; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33535796     DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) for urologists-when and which tracer?]

Authors:  Christoph Berliner; Claudia Kesch; Wolfgang P Fendler; Matthias Eiber; Tobias Maurer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Management of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Curative Treatment: A Focus on Older Patients.

Authors:  Lancelot Tremeau; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.271

3.  Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Felix Feng; Kirsten L Greene; James L Gulley; Michael Hofman; Bridget F Koontz; Daniel W Lin; Michael J Morris; Steve P Rowe; Trevor J Royce; Simpa Salami; Bital Savir-Baruch; Sandy Srinivas; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 11.082

4.  Performance of a Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Derived Risk-Stratification Tool for High-risk and Very High-risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael Xiang; Ting Martin Ma; Ricky Savjani; Erqi L Pollom; R Jeffrey Karnes; Tristan Grogan; Jessica K Wong; Giovanni Motterle; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Eric A Klein; Bradley J Stish; Robert T Dess; Daniel E Spratt; Avinash Pilar; Chandana Reddy; Rebecca Levin-Epstein; Trude B Wedde; Wolfgang A Lilleby; Ryan Fiano; Gregory S Merrick; Richard G Stock; D Jeffrey Demanes; Brian J Moran; Hartwig Huland; Phuoc T Tran; Santiago Martin; Rafael Martinez-Monge; Daniel J Krauss; Eyad I Abu-Isa; Ridwan Alam; Zeyad Schwen; Thomas M Pisansky; C Richard Choo; Daniel Y Song; Stephen Greco; Curtiland Deville; Todd McNutt; Theodore L DeWeese; Ashley E Ross; Jay P Ciezki; Paul C Boutros; Nicholas G Nickols; Prashant Bhat; David Shabsovich; Jesus E Juarez; Natalie Chong; Patrick A Kupelian; Matthew B Rettig; Nicholas G Zaorsky; Alejandro Berlin; Jonathan D Tward; Brian J Davis; Robert E Reiter; Michael L Steinberg; David Elashoff; Eric M Horwitz; Rahul D Tendulkar; Derya Tilki; Johannes Czernin; Andrei Gafita; Tahmineh Romero; Jeremie Calais; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  Standardised uptake values as determined on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography is associated with oncological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yves J L Bodar; Hans Veerman; Dennie Meijer; Katelijne de Bie; Pim J van Leeuwen; Maarten L Donswijk; R Jeroen A van Moorselaar; N Harry Hendrikse; Ronald Boellaard; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; André N Vis
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 5.969

Review 6.  [Clinical aspects in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  Philipp Krausewitz; M Ritter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 0.635

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.