Literature DB >> 33535237

Rapid, Sensitive, and Specific Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Detection: A Multicenter Comparison Between Standard Quantitative Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction and CRISPR-Based DETECTR.

Eelke Brandsma1,2, Han J M P Verhagen1,2, Thijs J W van de Laar2,3,4, Eric C J Claas5, Marion Cornelissen6, Emile van den Akker1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in CRISPR-based diagnostics suggest that DETECTR, a combination of reverse-transcriptase loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) and subsequent Cas12 bystander nuclease activation by amplicon-targeting ribonucleoprotein complexes, could be a faster and cheaper alternative to quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) without sacrificing sensitivity and/or specificity.
METHODS: In this study, we compare DETECTR with qRT-PCR to diagnose coronavirus disease 2019 on 378 patient samples. Patient sample dilution assays suggest a higher analytical sensitivity of DETECTR compared with qRT-PCR; however, this was not confirmed in this large patient cohort, where we report 95% reproducibility between the 2 tests.
RESULTS: These data showed that both techniques are equally sensitive in detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) providing additional value of DETECTR to the currently used qRT-PCR platforms. For DETECTR, different guide ribonucleic acids can be used simultaneously to obviate negative results due to mutations in N-gene. Lateral flow strips, suitable as a point-of-care test, showed a 100% correlation to the high-throughput DETECTR assay. More importantly, DETECTR was 100% specific for SARS-CoV-2 relative to other human coronaviruses.
CONCLUSIONS: Because there is no need for specialized equipment, DETECTR could be rapidly implemented as a complementary technically independent approach to qRT-PCR thereby increasing the testing capacity of medical microbiological laboratories and relieving the existent PCR platforms for routine non-SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; DETECTR; SARS-CoV-2; qRT-PCR

Year:  2021        PMID: 33535237     DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


  11 in total

Review 1.  Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Severino Jefferson Ribeiro da Silva; Jessica Catarine Frutuoso do Nascimento; Renata Pessôa Germano Mendes; Klarissa Miranda Guarines; Caroline Targino Alves da Silva; Poliana Gomes da Silva; Jurandy Júnior Ferraz de Magalhães; Justin R J Vigar; Abelardo Silva-Júnior; Alain Kohl; Keith Pardee; Lindomar Pena
Journal:  ACS Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 2.  Diagnostics of COVID-19 Based on CRISPR-Cas Coupled to Isothermal Amplification: A Comparative Analysis and Update.

Authors:  Armando Hernandez-Garcia; Melissa D Morales-Moreno; Erick G Valdés-Galindo; Eric P Jimenez-Nieto; Andrea Quezada
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

3.  Molecular and Serologic Diagnostic Technologies for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Halie M Rando; Christian Brueffer; Ronan Lordan; Anna Ada Dattoli; David Manheim; Jesse G Meyer; Ariel I Mundo; Dimitri Perrin; David Mai; Nils Wellhausen; Covid-Review Consortium; Anthony Gitter; Casey S Greene
Journal:  ArXiv       Date:  2022-04-26

4.  Evaluation of CRISPR-Based Assays for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pei-Ying Huang; Xin Yin; Yue-Ting Huang; Qi-Qing Ye; Si-Qing Chen; Xun-Jie Cao; Tian-Ao Xie; Xu-Guang Guo
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 3.052

5.  Understanding Laboratory Testing for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Ritu Cheema; Dean A Blumberg
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

6.  Sex and Gender-Related Differences in COVID-19 Diagnoses and SARS-CoV-2 Testing Practices During the First Wave of the Pandemic: The Dutch Lifelines COVID-19 Cohort Study.

Authors:  Aranka Viviënne Ballering; Sabine Oertelt-Prigione; Tim C Olde Hartman; Judith G M Rosmalen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 7.  Harnessing CRISPR-Cas to Combat COVID-19: From Diagnostics to Therapeutics.

Authors:  Kok Gan Chan; Geik Yong Ang; Choo Yee Yu; Chan Yean Yean
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-09

8.  Accuracy of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) to diagnose COVID-19, a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Song Wang; Jiayi Hu; Chuanying Sui; Guangliang He; Zihan Qu; Xiaofei Chen; Yashan Wang; Dingjie Guo; Xin Liu
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.848

9.  Unveiling the Potential Role of Nanozymes in Combating the COVID-19 Outbreak.

Authors:  Jafar Ali; Saira Naveed Elahi; Asghar Ali; Hassan Waseem; Rameesha Abid; Mohamed M Mohamed
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 10.  Current diagnostic approaches to detect two important betacoronaviruses: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Authors:  Zhi Xiong Chong; Winnie Pui Pui Liew; Hui Kian Ong; Chean Yeah Yong; Chong Seng Shit; Wan Yong Ho; Stephanie Y L Ng; Swee Keong Yeap
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.