| Literature DB >> 33535038 |
Pedro Gonzalez-Menendez1, Manuela Romano2, Hongxia Yan3, Ruhi Deshmukh4, Julien Papoin5, Leal Oburoglu2, Marie Daumur2, Anne-Sophie Dumé2, Ira Phadke6, Cédric Mongellaz2, Xiaoli Qu7, Phuong-Nhi Bories8, Michaela Fontenay9, Xiuli An7, Valérie Dardalhon2, Marc Sitbon2, Valérie S Zimmermann2, Patrick G Gallagher10, Saverio Tardito11, Lionel Blanc5, Narla Mohandas7, Naomi Taylor12, Sandrina Kinet13.
Abstract
The metabolic changes controlling the stepwise differentiation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) to mature erythrocytes are poorly understood. Here, we show that HSPC development to an erythroid-committed proerythroblast results in augmented glutaminolysis, generating alpha-ketoglutarate (αKG) and driving mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). However, sequential late-stage erythropoiesis is dependent on decreasing αKG-driven OXPHOS, and we find that isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) plays a central role in this process. IDH1 downregulation augments mitochondrial oxidation of αKG and inhibits reticulocyte generation. Furthermore, IDH1 knockdown results in the generation of multinucleated erythroblasts, a morphological abnormality characteristic of myelodysplastic syndrome and congenital dyserythropoietic anemia. We identify vitamin C homeostasis as a critical regulator of ineffective erythropoiesis; oxidized ascorbate increases mitochondrial superoxide and significantly exacerbates the abnormal erythroblast phenotype of IDH1-downregulated progenitors, whereas vitamin C, scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reprogramming mitochondrial metabolism, rescues erythropoiesis. Thus, an IDH1-vitamin C crosstalk controls terminal steps of human erythroid differentiation. Published by Elsevier Inc.Entities:
Keywords: alpha-ketoglutarate; enucleation; erythropoiesis; hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell; human; isocitrate dehydrogenase; mitochondria; oxidative phosphorylation; redox stress; vitamin C
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33535038 PMCID: PMC9169698 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108723
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Rep Impact factor: 9.995