Literature DB >> 33534860

Factors associated with under-reporting of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in cause-of-death records: A comparative study of two national databases in France from 2008 to 2012.

Caroline Even1, Luis Sagaon Teyssier2,3, Yoann Pointreau4, Stéphane Temam1, Florence Huguet5, Lionnel Geoffrois6, Michaël Schwarzinger3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To date, no study has evaluated the detection rate of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in cause-of-death records in Europe. Our objectives were to compare the number of deaths attributable to HNSCC from two national databases in France and to identify factors associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records.
METHODS: The national hospital discharge database and the national underlying cause-of-death records were compared for all HNSCC-attributable deaths in adult patients from 2008 to 2012 in France. Factors associated with under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records were assessed using multivariate Poisson regression.
RESULTS: A total of 41,503 in-hospital deaths were attributable to HNSCC as compared to 25,647 deaths reported in national UCoD records (a detection rate of 62%). Demographics at death were similar in both databases with respect to gender (83% men), age (54% premature deaths at 25-64 years), and geographic distribution. In multivariate Poisson regression, under-reporting of HNSCC in cause-of-death records significantly increased in 2012 compared to 2010 (+7%) and was independently associated with a primary HNSCC site other than the larynx, a former primary or second synchronous cancer other than HNSCC, distant metastasis, palliative care, and death in hospitals other than comprehensive cancer care centers. The main study results were robust in a sensitivity analysis which also took into account deaths outside hospital (overall, 51,129 HNSCC-attributable deaths; a detection rate of 50%). For the year 2012, the age-standardized mortality rate for HNSCC derived from underlying cause-of-death records was less than half that derived from hospital discharge summaries (14.7 compared to 34.1 per 100,000 for men and 2.7 compared to 6.2 per 100,000 for women).
CONCLUSION: HNSCC is largely under-reported in cause-of-death records. This study documents the value of national hospital discharge databases as a complement to death certificates for ascertaining cancer deaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33534860      PMCID: PMC7857613          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  33 in total

1.  Comparing hospital discharge records with death certificates: can the differences be explained?

Authors:  Lars Age Johansson; R Westerling
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  The Best Use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index With Electronic Health Care Database to Predict Mortality.

Authors:  Aurélie Bannay; Christophe Chaignot; Pierre-Olivier Blotière; Mickaël Basson; Alain Weill; Philippe Ricordeau; François Alla
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Second primary cancers after an index head and neck cancer: subsite-specific trends in the era of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer.

Authors:  Luc G T Morris; Andrew G Sikora; Snehal G Patel; Richard B Hayes; Ian Ganly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Prognoses and improvement for head and neck cancers diagnosed in Europe in early 2000s: The EUROCARE-5 population-based study.

Authors:  Gemma Gatta; Laura Botta; María José Sánchez; Lesley Ann Anderson; Daniela Pierannunzio; Lisa Licitra
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  The accuracy of cancer mortality statistics based on death certificates in the United States.

Authors:  Robert R German; Aliza K Fink; Melonie Heron; Sherri L Stewart; Chris J Johnson; Jack L Finch; Daixin Yin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Probabilities of dying from cancer and other causes in French cancer patients based on an unbiased estimator of net survival: a study of five common cancers.

Authors:  H Charvat; N Bossard; L Daubisse; F Binder; A Belot; L Remontet
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Unexplained differences between hospital and mortality data indicated mistakes in death certification: an investigation of 1,094 deaths in Sweden during 1995.

Authors:  Lars Age Johansson; Charlotte Björkenstam; Ragnar Westerling
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Validity of Diagnostic Codes for Acute Stroke in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Natalie McCormick; Vidula Bhole; Diane Lacaille; J Antonio Avina-Zubieta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quality comparison of electronic versus paper death certificates in France, 2010.

Authors:  Delphine Lefeuvre; Gérard Pavillon; Albertine Aouba; Agathe Lamarche-Vadel; Anne Fouillet; Eric Jougla; Grégoire Rey
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2014-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.