Literature DB >> 33534849

Negligible-cost microfluidic device fabrication using 3D-printed interconnecting channel scaffolds.

Harry Felton1, Robert Hughes1, Andrea Diaz-Gaxiola2,3.   

Abstract

This paper reports a novel, negligible-cost and open-source process for the rapid prototyping of complex microfluidic devices in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) using 3D-printed interconnecting microchannel scaffolds. These single-extrusion scaffolds are designed with interconnecting ends and used to quickly configure complex microfluidic systems before being embedded in PDMS to produce an imprint of the microfluidic configuration. The scaffolds are printed using common Material Extrusion (MEX) 3D printers and the limits, cost & reliability of the process are evaluated. The limits of standard MEX 3D-printing with off-the-shelf printer modifications is shown to achieve a minimum channel cross-section of 100×100 μm. The paper also lays out a protocol for the rapid fabrication of low-cost microfluidic channel moulds from the thermoplastic 3D-printed scaffolds, allowing the manufacture of customisable microfluidic systems without specialist equipment. The morphology of the resulting PDMS microchannels fabricated with the method are characterised and, when applied directly to glass, without plasma surface treatment, are shown to efficiently operate within the typical working pressures of commercial microfluidic devices. The technique is further validated through the demonstration of 2 common microfluidic devices; a fluid-mixer demonstrating the effective interconnecting scaffold design, and a microsphere droplet generator. The minimal cost of manufacture means that a 5000-piece physical library of mix-and-match channel scaffolds (100 μm scale) can be printed for ~$0.50 and made available to researchers and educators who lack access to appropriate technology. This simple yet innovative approach dramatically lowers the threshold for research and education into microfluidics and will make possible the rapid prototyping of point-of-care lab-on-a-chip diagnostic technology that is truly affordable the world over.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33534849      PMCID: PMC7857642          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  30 in total

1.  An integrated approach to a portable and low-cost immunoassay for resource-poor settings.

Authors:  Samuel K Sia; Vincent Linder; Babak Amir Parviz; Adam Siegel; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Production of alginate beads by emulsification/internal gelation. I. Methodology.

Authors:  D Poncelet; R Lencki; C Beaulieu; J P Halle; R J Neufeld; A Fournier
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Self-powered Imbibing Microfluidic Pump by Liquid Encapsulation: SIMPLE.

Authors:  Tadej Kokalj; Younggeun Park; Matjaž Vencelj; Monika Jenko; Luke P Lee
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Detection of antibiotic residues in pork using paper-based microfluidic device coupled with filtration and concentration.

Authors:  Azadeh Nilghaz; Xiaonan Lu
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 5.  Microfluidics and cancer: are we there yet?

Authors:  Zhuo Zhang; Sunitha Nagrath
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.838

Review 6.  Unconventional low-cost fabrication and patterning techniques for point of care diagnostics.

Authors:  Himanshu Sharma; Diep Nguyen; Aaron Chen; Valerie Lew; Michelle Khine
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  3D-printed microfluidic device for the detection of pathogenic bacteria using size-based separation in helical channel with trapezoid cross-section.

Authors:  Wonjae Lee; Donghoon Kwon; Woong Choi; Gyoo Yeol Jung; Sangmin Jeon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Simple and Versatile 3D Printed Microfluidics Using Fused Filament Fabrication.

Authors:  Alex J L Morgan; Lorena Hidalgo San Jose; William D Jamieson; Jennifer M Wymant; Bing Song; Phil Stephens; David A Barrow; Oliver K Castell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  3D printed water-soluble scaffolds for rapid production of PDMS micro-fluidic flow chambers.

Authors:  Tobias Dahlberg; Tim Stangner; Hanqing Zhang; Krister Wiklund; Petter Lundberg; Ludvig Edman; Magnus Andersson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Customizable 3D Printed 'Plug and Play' Millifluidic Devices for Programmable Fluidics.

Authors:  Soichiro Tsuda; Hussain Jaffery; David Doran; Mohammad Hezwani; Phillip J Robbins; Mari Yoshida; Leroy Cronin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidic Biosensor-Based Devices for Rapid Diagnosis and Effective Anti-cancer Therapeutic Monitoring for Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  V S Sukanya; Subha Narayan Rath
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Versatile and Low-Cost Fabrication of Modular Lock-and-Key Microfluidics for Integrated Connector Mixer Using a Stereolithography 3D Printing.

Authors:  Isa Anshori; Vincent Lukito; Rafita Adhawiyah; Delpita Putri; Suksmandhira Harimurti; Tati Latifah Erawati Rajab; Arfat Pradana; Mohammad Akbar; Mas Rizky Anggun Adipurna Syamsunarno; Murni Handayani; Agnes Purwidyantri; Briliant Adhi Prabowo
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.523

Review 3.  A 3D Printer in the Lab: Not Only a Toy.

Authors:  Vittorio Saggiomo
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 17.521

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.