Literature DB >> 33534848

Comparing driving behavior of humans and autonomous driving in a professional racing simulator.

Adrian Remonda1, Eduardo Veas1,2, Granit Luzhnica2.   

Abstract

Motorsports have become an excellent playground for testing the limits of technology, machines, and human drivers. This paper presents a study that used a professional racing simulator to compare the behavior of human and autonomous drivers under an aggressive driving scenario. A professional simulator offers a close-to-real emulation of underlying physics and vehicle dynamics, as well as a wealth of clean telemetry data. In the first study, the participants' task was to achieve the fastest lap while keeping the car on the track. We grouped the resulting laps according to the performance (lap-time), defining driving behaviors at various performance levels. An extensive analysis of vehicle control features obtained from telemetry data was performed with the goal of predicting the driving performance and informing an autonomous system. In the second part of the study, a state-of-the-art reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm was trained to control the brake, throttle and steering of the simulated racing car. We investigated how the features used to predict driving performance in humans can be used in autonomous driving. Our study investigates human driving patterns with the goal of finding traces that could improve the performance of RL approaches. Conversely, they can also be applied to training (professional) drivers to improve their racing line.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33534848      PMCID: PMC7857611          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  15 in total

1.  Performance in motor sports.

Authors:  A J Klarica
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.

Authors:  F ROSENBLATT
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. 1943.

Authors:  W S McCulloch; W Pitts
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 5.  The case for driver science in motorsport: a review and recommendations.

Authors:  Edward S Potkanowicz; Ronald W Mendel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet.

Authors:  L M Parsons
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Neural network vehicle models for high-performance automated driving.

Authors:  Nathan A Spielberg; Matthew Brown; Nitin R Kapania; John C Kegelman; J Christian Gerdes
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2019-03-27

Review 8.  Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Differences between racing and non-racing drivers: A simulator study using eye-tracking.

Authors:  Peter M van Leeuwen; Stefan de Groot; Riender Happee; Joost C F de Winter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Racer's Mind-How Core Perceptual-Cognitive Expertise Is Reflected in Deliberate Practice Procedures in Professional Motorsport.

Authors:  Otto Lappi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.