Natasha Lelijveld1,2, Eunice Musyoki3, Susan Were Adongo3, Amy Mayberry1, Jonathan C Wells4, Charles Opondo5, Marko Kerac6, Jeanette Bailey6,7. 1. No Wasted Lives, Action Against Hunger, London, United Kingdom. 2. Emergency Nutrition Network, Oxford, United Kingdom. 3. International Rescue Committee, Nairobi, Kenya. 4. Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, UCL Great Ormond Street, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 5. Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 6. Department of Population Health, Centre for Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 7. International Rescue Committee, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Severe and moderate acute malnutrition (SAM and MAM) affect more than 50 million children worldwide yet 80% of these children do not access care. The Combined Protocol for Acute Malnutrition Study (ComPAS) trial assessed the effectiveness of a simplified, combined SAM/MAM protocol for children aged 6-59 months and found non-inferior recovery compared to standard care. To further inform policy, this study assessed post-discharge outcomes of children treated with this novel protocol in Kenya. METHODS: Six 'combined' protocol clinics treated SAM and MAM children using an optimised mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)-based dose of ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF). Six 'standard care' clinics treated SAM with weight-based RUTF rations; MAM with ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF). Four months post-discharge, we assessed anthropometry, recent history of illness, and body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Data was analysed using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, sex and allowing for clustering by clinic. RESULTS: We sampled 850 children (median age 18 months, IQR 15-23); 44% of the original trial sample in Kenya. Children treated with the combined protocol had similar anthropometry, fat-free mass, fat mass, skinfold thickness z-scores, and frequency of common illnesses 4 months post-discharge compared the standard protocol. Mean subscapular skinfold z-scores were close to the global norm (standard care: 0.24; combined 0.27). There was no significant difference in odds of relapse between protocols (SAM, 3% vs 3%, OR = 1.0 p = 0.75; MAM, 10% vs 12%, OR = 0.90 p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lower dosage of RUTF for most SAM children in the combined protocol, their anthropometry and relapse rates at 4 months post-discharge were similar to standard care. MAM children treated with RUTF had similar body composition to those treated with RUSF and neither group exhibited excess adiposity. These results add further evidence that a combined protocol is as effective as standard care with no evidence of adverse effects post-discharge. A simplified, combined approach could treat more children, stretch existing resources further, and contribute to achieving Sustainable Development Goal Two.
INTRODUCTION: Severe and moderate acute malnutrition (SAM and MAM) affect more than 50 million children worldwide yet 80% of these children do not access care. The Combined Protocol for Acute Malnutrition Study (ComPAS) trial assessed the effectiveness of a simplified, combined SAM/MAM protocol for children aged 6-59 months and found non-inferior recovery compared to standard care. To further inform policy, this study assessed post-discharge outcomes of children treated with this novel protocol in Kenya. METHODS: Six 'combined' protocol clinics treated SAM and MAMchildren using an optimised mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC)-based dose of ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF). Six 'standard care' clinics treated SAM with weight-based RUTF rations; MAM with ready-to-use supplementary food (RUSF). Four months post-discharge, we assessed anthropometry, recent history of illness, and body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Data was analysed using multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, sex and allowing for clustering by clinic. RESULTS: We sampled 850 children (median age 18 months, IQR 15-23); 44% of the original trial sample in Kenya. Children treated with the combined protocol had similar anthropometry, fat-free mass, fat mass, skinfold thickness z-scores, and frequency of common illnesses 4 months post-discharge compared the standard protocol. Mean subscapular skinfold z-scores were close to the global norm (standard care: 0.24; combined 0.27). There was no significant difference in odds of relapse between protocols (SAM, 3% vs 3%, OR = 1.0 p = 0.75; MAM, 10% vs 12%, OR = 0.90 p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lower dosage of RUTF for most SAM children in the combined protocol, their anthropometry and relapse rates at 4 months post-discharge were similar to standard care. MAMchildren treated with RUTF had similar body composition to those treated with RUSF and neither group exhibited excess adiposity. These results add further evidence that a combined protocol is as effective as standard care with no evidence of adverse effects post-discharge. A simplified, combined approach could treat more children, stretch existing resources further, and contribute to achieving Sustainable Development Goal Two.
Authors: Sarah Bartz; Aaloke Mody; Christoph Hornik; James Bain; Michael Muehlbauer; Tonny Kiyimba; Elizabeth Kiboneka; Robert Stevens; John Bartlett; John V St Peter; Christopher B Newgard; Michael Freemark Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-02-27 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Tsinuel Girma; Pernille Kæstel; Netsanet Workeneh; Christian Mølgaard; Simon Eaton; Gregers S Andersen; Kim F Michaelsen; Henrik Friis; Jonathan C K Wells Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: James M Njunge; Agnes Gwela; Nelson K Kibinge; Moses Ngari; Lydia Nyamako; Emily Nyatichi; Johnstone Thitiri; Gerard Bryan Gonzales; Robert H J Bandsma; Judd L Walson; Evelyn N Gitau; James A Berkley Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Suvi T Kangas; Cécile Salpéteur; Victor Nikièma; Leisel Talley; Christian Ritz; Henrik Friis; André Briend; Pernille Kaestel Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Robin Schaefer; Amy Mayberry; André Briend; Mark Manary; Polly Walker; Heather Stobaugh; Kerstin Hanson; Marie McGrath; Robert Black Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Natasha Phillipa O'Sullivan; Natasha Lelijveld; Alexandra Rutishauser-Perera; Marko Kerac; Philip James Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Natasha Lelijveld; Claire Godbout; Destiny Krietemeyer; Alyssa Los; Donna Wegner; David T Hendrixson; Robert Bandsma; Aminata Koroma; Mark Manary Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 7.045