Literature DB >> 33534788

Survival outcomes are associated with genomic instability in luminal breast cancers.

Lydia King1,2, Andrew Flaus3, Emma Holian2, Aaron Golden2.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death among women. Breast cancers are generally diagnosed and treated based on clinical and histopathological features, along with subtype classification determined by the Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay (also known as PAM50). Currently the copy number alteration (CNA) landscape of the tumour is not considered. We set out to examine the role of genomic instability (GI) in breast cancer survival since CNAs reflect GI and correlate with survival in other cancers. We focused on the 70% of breast cancers classified as luminal and carried out a comprehensive survival and association analysis using Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) data to determine whether CNA Score Quartiles derived from absolute CNA counts are associated with survival. Analysis revealed that patients diagnosed with luminal A breast cancer have a CNA landscape associated with disease specific survival, suggesting that CNA Score can provide a statistically robust prognostic factor. Furthermore, stratification of patients into subtypes based on gene expression has shown that luminal A and B cases overlap, and it is in this region we largely observe luminal A cases with reduced survival outlook. Therefore, luminal A breast cancer patients with quantitatively elevated CNA counts may benefit from more aggressive therapy. This demonstrates how individual genomic landscapes can facilitate personalisation of therapeutic interventions to optimise survival outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33534788      PMCID: PMC7857737          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  30 in total

1.  Integrating copy number polymorphisms into array CGH analysis using a robust HMM.

Authors:  Sohrab P Shah; Xiang Xuan; Ron J DeLeeuw; Mehrnoush Khojasteh; Wan L Lam; Raymond Ng; Kevin P Murphy
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications.

Authors:  T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Global Cancer in Women: Burden and Trends.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Farhad Islami; Rebecca L Siegel; Elizabeth M Ward; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  A new genome-driven integrated classification of breast cancer and its implications.

Authors:  Sarah-Jane Dawson; Oscar M Rueda; Samuel Aparicio; Carlos Caldas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Aneuploidy drives lethal progression in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Konrad H Stopsack; Charles A Whittaker; Travis A Gerke; Massimo Loda; Philip W Kantoff; Lorelei A Mucci; Angelika Amon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; W C Wood; A S Coates; R D Gelber; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Emerging landscape of oncogenic signatures across human cancers.

Authors:  Giovanni Ciriello; Martin L Miller; Bülent Arman Aksoy; Yasin Senbabaoglu; Nikolaus Schultz; Chris Sander
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173,797 patients.

Authors:  Sepideh Saadatmand; Reini Bretveld; Sabine Siesling; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-06

10.  Analytical validation of the PAM50-based Prosigna Breast Cancer Prognostic Gene Signature Assay and nCounter Analysis System using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens.

Authors:  Torsten Nielsen; Brett Wallden; Carl Schaper; Sean Ferree; Shuzhen Liu; Dongxia Gao; Garrett Barry; Naeem Dowidar; Malini Maysuria; James Storhoff
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bioinformatic identification of genomic instability-associated lncRNAs signatures for improving the clinical outcome of cervical cancer by a prognostic model.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Nan Ding; Yongxing He; Chengbin Tao; Zhongzhen Liang; Wenhu Xin; Qianyun Zhang; Fang Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  QNBC Is Associated with High Genomic Instability Characterized by Copy Number Alterations and miRNA Deregulation.

Authors:  Shristi Bhattarai; Bruna M Sugita; Stefanne M Bortoletto; Aline S Fonseca; Luciane R Cavalli; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.