BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare 2 techniques used for primary muscular repair and perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effects of radical intravelar veloplasty (IVV) on nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate. METHODS: This is an ambispective study between 2 groups of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who were operated using a radical and conservative form of IVV in Lima Peru. Data collection was accomplished by evaluation of speech development and middle ear function of the patients. A systematic review of the literature for studies published until June 2020 to evaluate the effect using the radical IVV in patients with cleft lip and palate. RESULTS: Our comparative study did not find statistically significant differences in speech development between the studied techniques for unilateral cleft palate repair. Increased number of ear tube placements have been observed in the group treated with radical form of IVV. After systematic literature searching, 10 identified studies were qualified for the final analysis, which included 1367 patients. The overall study quality according to Oxford CEBM and GRADE scale was low. CONCLUSIONS: The results arising from this study provides statistical evidence that one technique let us obtain better speech outcomes. A technique with conservative IVV has statistical significant fewer rate of middle ear disorders after primary cleft palate repair. Based on available scientific evidence, definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of radical IVV on velopharyngeal and middle ear function cannot be drawn.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare 2 techniques used for primary muscular repair and perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the effects of radical intravelar veloplasty (IVV) on nonsyndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate. METHODS: This is an ambispective study between 2 groups of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who were operated using a radical and conservative form of IVV in Lima Peru. Data collection was accomplished by evaluation of speech development and middle ear function of the patients. A systematic review of the literature for studies published until June 2020 to evaluate the effect using the radical IVV in patients with cleft lip and palate. RESULTS: Our comparative study did not find statistically significant differences in speech development between the studied techniques for unilateral cleft palate repair. Increased number of ear tube placements have been observed in the group treated with radical form of IVV. After systematic literature searching, 10 identified studies were qualified for the final analysis, which included 1367 patients. The overall study quality according to Oxford CEBM and GRADE scale was low. CONCLUSIONS: The results arising from this study provides statistical evidence that one technique let us obtain better speech outcomes. A technique with conservative IVV has statistical significant fewer rate of middle ear disorders after primary cleft palate repair. Based on available scientific evidence, definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of radical IVV on velopharyngeal and middle ear function cannot be drawn.