The host mTOR pathway and parasitic diseases pathogenesis.

The mechanistic (or mammalian) target of rapamycin (mTOR) is considered as a critical regulatory enzyme involved in essential signaling pathways affecting cell growth, cell proliferation, protein translation, regulation of cellular metabolism, and cytoskeletal structure. Also, mTOR signaling has crucial roles in cell homeostasis via processes such as autophagy. Autophagy prevents many pathogen infections and is involved on immunosurveillance and pathogenesis. Immune responses and autophagy are therefore key host responses and both are linked by complex mTOR regulatory mechanisms. In recent years, the mTOR pathway has been highlighted in different diseases such as diabetes, cancer, and infectious and parasitic diseases including leishmaniasis, toxoplasmosis, and malaria. The current review underlines the implications of mTOR signals and intricate networks on pathogen infections and the modulation of this master regulator by parasites. Parasitic infections are able to induce dynamic metabolic reprogramming leading to mTOR alterations in spite of many other ways impacting this regulatory network. Accordingly, the identification of parasite effects and interactions over such a complex modulation might reveal novel information regarding the biology of the abovementioned parasites and might allow the development of therapeutic strategies against parasitic diseases. In this sense, the effects of inhibiting the mTOR pathways are also considered in this context in the light of their potential for the prevention and treatment of parasitic diseases.

Introduction

Malaria, toxoplasmosis, and neglected tropical diseases including leishmaniasis and trypanosomiasis are deadly diseases in humans and a major global health challenge. Malaria is endemic in 87 countries and causes approximately 219 million clinical cases and 435,000 deaths per year. Morbidity and mortality especially occurred in pregnant women and children living in the African Region (Gitta and Kilian 2020). Regarding leishmaniasis, approximately 1.5 to 2 million new cases are annually reported worldwide being 310 million people at risk. The mortality rate of leishmaniosis varies from 40,000 to 70,000 cases per year. The clinical manifestations of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) are mostly restricted to the skin lesions with different appearances, whereas visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is characterized by severe organic symptoms and might lead to death (Torres-Guerrero et al. 2017). Concerning toxoplasmosis, Toxoplasma gondii is its causative agent. It is an infectious zoonotic disease highly prevalent in humans in several regions including Brazil (77.5%), Sao Tome and Principe (75.2%), Iran (63.9%), Colombia (63.5%), and Cuba (61.8%) (Montazeri et al. 2020). Dealing with trypanosomes, these could cause African and American trypanosomiasis, whereas human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness) is caused by Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and another chronic form occurring mostly in West and Central Africa, caused by T. brucei gambiense. In sleeping sickness, parasites initially can be detected in the bloodstream and interstitial spaces of several organs. After that, the parasites can potentially invade the central nervous system, indicating the start of the late stage (Rijo-Ferreira and Takahashi 2020). Another parasitic infectious disease, Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) is a chronic infection caused by T. cruzi. It is transmitted to human beings through the feces of infected triatomine bugs. The disease approximately affects 8 to 10 million people in the Americas, putting them at risk of developing life-threatening cardiac and gastrointestinal complications (Echeverria and Morillo 2019). These data clearly show the impact of the main parasitic diseases which may be at the molecular level mediated by the manipulation of key host signaling events. The mechanistic (previously referred as mammalian) target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a human serine–threonine kinase belonging to the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)–related kinase family that tightly control gene expression, translation and at post-translational level, cell signaling, and function impacting essential physiological processes like the metabolism or autophagy with pathogenic insights (Bolourian and Mojtahedi 2020; Guertin and Sabatini 2007; Yeh and Yong 2020). Thus, mTOR plays a central function integrating signals and orchestrating their physiologic effects.

This master regulator binds to different groups of proteins and is composed by two distinct intracellular protein complexes, called mTOR1 (mTORC1) and mTOR2 (mTORC2) each of them having different subcellular localizations (mTORC1 is associated with endosomal and lysosomal membranes whereas mTORC2 is located at the plasma and ribosomal membranes) and specific subunits, thus exhibiting distinct functions and regulations. mTORC1 is rapamycin sensitive and mainly functions controlling protein synthesis, lipid metabolism, and organelle biogenesis. On the other hand, mTOR2 is rapamycin insensitive functioning as a regulator of the actin cytoskeleton, metabolism, and cell survival (Tian et al. 2019). Ultimately, the signals orchestrate multiple and complex molecular responses tightly controlled by multistep processes of activation determined by the stimulus, cell type, and the molecularly and spatially distinct mTOR pools (Sabatini 2017; Smith et al. 2020). As a major regulatory protein, mTORC1 controls cell growth, proliferation, and protein translation in response to signals from nutrients, growth factors, energy, and stress. Meanwhile, mTORC2 is relevant for the regulation of cellular metabolism and cytoskeletal structure (Betz and Hall 2013; Dimasuay et al. 2017a). A summary of different functions of mTORC1, mTORC2, and mTORC1 and its duty in regulation of different steps of autophagy has been depicted in Fig. 1, which makes this an attractive drug target. According to the critical role of mTOR pathway in vital cellular processes and diseases, mTOR inhibitors such as rapamycin and its analogues (rapalogues) have been newly applied to fight against cancers, rheumatoid arthritis, coronary restenosis, and organ transplantation (Santulli and Totary-Jain 2013).

Fig. 1

a mTOR pathway: mTORC1 is activated by nutrients and mostly acts via the phosphorylation of two important effectors, 4EBP and p70S6 kinase 1 (S6K1). mTORC1 phosphorylates S6K1, which in turn phosphorylates and activates substrates included in mRNA translation initiation, such as eIF4B, a positive regulator of the 50 cap-binding eIF4F complex. mTORC1 phosphorylates 4EBP at different sites to induce its separation from eIF4E, triggering 50cap–dependent mRNA translation by the assembled eIF4F complex, b mTORC1 and its role in the regulation of autophagy: the activity of the unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) complex is inhibited by phosphorylating autophagy–related gene 13 (ATG13) and ULK1. The nucleation stage of autophagy is inhibited through the phosphorylation of activating molecule in beclin-1-regulated autophagy (AMBRA1), nuclear receptor–binding factor 2 (NRBF2), and Atg14 in the PI3KC3 complex I. Phosphorylation of WD-repeat domain phosphoinositide–interacting protein-2 (WIPI2) and p300 and by mTORC1 inhibits VSP34 activity/LC3 lipidation and the recruitment of phosphatidylinositol phosphates along with the LC3 conjugation system for the autophagosome elongation. Eventually, mTORC1 negatively regulates the fusion of the autophagosome with the lysosome via the phosphorylation of pacer and UV radiation resistance–associated gene (UVRAG) that are essential for the lipid kinase activity of PI3KC3 complex II and the recruitment of the homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) tethering complex (Albert et al. 2010; Dossou and Basu 2019; Saxton and Sabatini 2017)

mTOR signaling pathway integrates both intracellular and extracellular signals through multi-protein complexes. Each of these has several components acting as interacting proteins that basically regulate assembly of the complex, recruit substrates for mTOR, and ultimately control its functions. Due to the discovery of numerous mTOR-interacting proteins in different cells and diseases, further biochemical and molecular studies are needed to identify the exact role of such proteins in mTOR signaling and their possible involvements in diseases and health.

Advances in understanding the complex signaling network upstream and downstream this molecule has led to a better knowledge of the mechanism of many diseases, including infectious and parasitic diseases. Actually, we know the intimate connectivity between parasites and host cell metabolism. For example, it was described that parasites may induce dynamic changes in the expression levels of host genes involved in catabolism that subsequently cause alterations in mTOR levels or states making mTOR a metabolic checkpoint kinase (Byles et al. 2013; Xu et al. 2019).

The current review attempts to update and describe the main related pathways and networks in which mTOR is involved in relation to pathogen infectious processes and the impact of parasite infections on these molecular signals and downstream effects. Such relevant interactions are mostly involved in the pathogenicity, immunopathology, survival, and proliferation of these parasites. This highly important multi-faceted regulatory network upon infection is an attractive target for the control of these diseases. Thus, the role of important inhibitors of mTOR and autophagy activator that has been previously highlighted for the treatment of different diseases is reviewed herein pointing out the potential of these to underline some important molecular implications for the successful parasitic infectious processes. This knowledge may favor therapeutic and preventive actions directed to this key molecular mechanism for the treatment of important parasitic diseases.

mTOR signaling networks: autophagy and immune responses

mTOR pathway regulate many essential cellular processes and physiological functions such as proliferation, metabolism, and autophagy—contributing to cellular homeostasis—among others. In addition, the mTOR pathway is also involved in regulating directly—immune cell differentiation and effector function, or indirectly, immunometabolic signaling of T cells—the immune responses which show the essential regulatory networks in which is involved in (Saravia et al. 2020). Therefore, mutations in the components of the mTOR pathway frequently induce disorders like those detected in cancers. The regulatory role is basically achieved upon upstream signals through a cascade-mediated activity control mechanisms and/or by post-translational modifications of downstream or effector proteins in a temporal and spatial manner (Table 1) (Jiang et al. 2019; Qian et al. 2020; Tian et al. 2019). In addition, the mTOR pathway is associated with other signaling pathways like the 5′-adenosine monophosphate–activated protein kinase (AMPK). These networks acting as molecular switchers can regulate other pathways or processes like autophagy impacting on immune system maintenance, and thus pointing out the complexity of these mTOR-dependent molecular circuits (Kim et al. 2011; Maiese 2020). mTOR normally acts as a nutrient sensor inhibiting autophagy—its phosphorylated form—but can be inhibited via stress (including pathogen infection) and nutrient starvation to initiate autophagy acting as a unique molecular intermediate that negatively regulates autophagy. The process may also be regulated via mTOR-independent pathways. Moreover, natural mTOR inhibitors like rapamycin and its derivatives act as autophagy activator both in vitro and in vivo having mTORC1 and mTORC2 important differences in their sensitivities to it.

Table 1

Main mTOR signaling networks in relation with each of the molecular nodes (Laplante and Sabatini 2009; Tian et al. 2019)

Signal/pathway/stimuli/functions	mTOR1	mTOR2	Integration/origin (molecular pathway)
Growth factors	✔		I (insulin and Ras via PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways)
Energy status	✔		I (AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK))
Oxygen levels	✔		I (ATP/AMPK/TSC1/2)
Amino acids	✔		I (VPS34/GTPases)
Inflammatory mediators	✔		I (TSC1/2 complex)
Wnt ligand and PA	✔		I (TSC1/2 complex)
Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-triphosphate (PIP3)	✔		I (AKT)
DNA damage	✔		I (p53,TSC2)
Energy exhaustion	✔		I (AMPK, TSC1/2)
Protein synthesis	✔		O (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and p70 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (S6K1))
Autophagy	✔		O (unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1), autophagy-related gene 13 (ATG13), and focal adhesion kinase family–interacting protein of 200 kDa (FIP200))
Lipid synthesis	✔		O (sterol regulatory element–binding protein 1 (SREBP1), peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-g (PPARg))
Mitochondrial metabolism and biogenesis	✔		O (PPARg coactivator 1 (PGC1-a))
Translation	✔		O (4EBP1 and S6K1)
Growth factors		✔	I (AKT)
Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-triphosphate (PIP3)		✔	I (directly)
PI3K/Akt, mTORC1		✔	I (directly)
S6K1		✔	I (insulin receptor substrate (IRS))
Cell survival, metabolism, and proliferation		✔	O (AKT, FoxO1, SGK1, TSC1/2)
Cytoskeletal organization		✔	O (PKCa, paxillin, and GTP/RhoA and Rac1)
Cell survival, cytoskeleton reorganization, and cell movements		✔	O (serum and glucocorticoid kinase (SGK) and protein kinase C (PKC))

I, integration (pathway/molecule regulating the component); O, originated (pathway/molecule/effectors regulated by the component)

Autophagy is a conserved cellular degradation process via the formation of double-membrane-bound autophagosomes. This phenomenon plays important roles in maintaining homeostasis and preventing infection-mediated stresses between others. Furthermore, several distinct but related intracellular defense responses depend on autophagy-related genes which may be intertwined with pattern recognition receptor (PRR), inflammatory, and cell death pathways, and therefore can alter immune responses including inflammatory responses (Hu et al. 2015; Viret et al. 2018). On the other hand, autophagy is regulated by immunological and stress signals. The cross-talk between these signaling pathways helps to maintain homeostasis and physiological functions (Hua et al. 2019). The dysfunction of these regulatory networks is the cause of several diseases. Therefore, the dysfunction of autophagy has been linked to inflammatory diseases and defective immune responses against pathogens and may have pathological consequences including pathogen hyper-virulence (Jang et al. 2019). Additional functions and roles of autophagy detecting, cross-talking with, capturing and destroying invading pathogens have been described. Microorganisms have developed strategies to hijack selected sets of molecular mechanisms of the autophagic pathway to establish infection (Miller and Celli 2016). In spite of the complex regulatory process—with the potential of particular kinetics upon infections—and the dual outcomes of autophagy (anti-pathogens or favoring pathogen infections, even mixed responses, for example, favoring early during infections but becoming protective later in infections), parasites are also able to effectively evade and modulate host autophagy targeting mTOR which also impact on parasitic disease pathogenesis (Ghartey-Kwansah et al. 2020; Metz et al. 2015).

In addition, mTOR implications in the immune system are very relevant. The functional properties and the polarization states of the immune cells are dependent of conditions like hypoxia, pathogen-derived ligands, or lipid mediators, pointing out this molecule in sensing immune microenvironment and dictating the functions and differentiation of immune cells. However, it has recently been demonstrated that mTOR plays critical roles regulating CD4+ T cells, including not only T helper 1 (Th1), Th2 but also other Th cell subsets (critical in the immunity, inflammation and diseases) like Th9, Th17, regulatory T cells (Tregs) and forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells (Wang et al. 2020). All these data highlight that mTOR is a key regulator of immune function impacting the immune cells maturation and differentiation and serving as a link between regulation of metabolism and function and activity of the cells of the immune system among others (Patsoukis et al. 2017). In sum, the mTOR-based modulatory and interconnected molecular events of essential and specialized host mechanisms in response to pathogen infections seems to be crucial for the control of infection and its therapeutic or prophylactic targeting might have significant clinical implications (Yang et al. 2020).

mTOR signaling during pathogen infections

Years ago, many questions arose regarding the complex regulatory functions of this protein including the implications of their dysfunction or dysregulation in health and disease, mainly cancer. Given the previously detailed pivotal functions of mTOR on key host molecular responses it’s not surprising the idea that pathogens modulate these pathways by targeting mTOR to further enhance their chances of survival. Thus, pathogens target mTOR complexes either directly or indirectly through for example interaction with upstream signals mediated by amino acids or with downstream signals transduced by lipids (Nouwen and Everts 2020). Pathogens may target other processes controlled by this kinase such as autophagy or translation, and finally promote immune evasion. Autophagy can be either inhibited or activated upon pathogen infection; to evade pathogen degradation and recognition or to support nutrients for replication, respectively (Le Sage et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2009a). Recently, it has been discovered that rickettsiae interfere in vitro with the autophagic response of endothelial cells activating mTOR and triggering an initial autophagy response, thus allowing the establishment of an intracellular infection (Sahni et al. 2020).

Now, we know that many pathogens affect host cell pathways including mTOR and autophagy to develop the infection processes in their hosts (Nouwen and Everts 2020). Viruses target mTOR pathway with diverse approaches and at specific levels to achieve mRNA translation and modulate apoptosis and autophagy. Viruses have different targeting strategies between vertebrates and arthropod vectors and some like dengue virus serotype-2 (DENV-2) and ZIKA viruses obtain relevant benefits of arthropod TOR autophagy inhibition (Brackney et al. 2020; Le Sage et al. 2016; Patel and Hardy 2012). In this sense, the inhibition of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway affects the autophagic reaction induced by pathogen infections (Yang et al. 2020). Therefore, autophagy and mTOR have a close relationship acting as a multi-use bridge in pathogen infections and host cells, especially taking into account its immune signaling involvement on innate and adaptive immune responses. Several viruses modulate mTOR activity by subverting the mTORC1 signaling network targeting upstream points like PI3K, protein kinase B (Akt), or tuberous sclerosis complex-2 (TSC-2), although others also act downstream the mTOR node or via lysosomal signaling. In addition, the application of multiple strategies to interact with and have the control over mTOR signaling is normal in viruses (Le Sage et al. 2016).

The host translation by mTOR is also modulated by pathogens with several aims: (i) to promote the translation of their mRNAs, (2) to liberate amino acids, or (3) to inhibit cytokine responses (De Leon et al. 2017; Joubert et al. 2015). Lastly, the control of host anti-inflammatory responses via interleukin 10 (IL-10) production may also be achieved by pathogens upon selective signaling through PI3K-Akt-mTOR since cytokine production is dependent on mTOR signaling. Pro-inflammation can be also promoted by the cross-talk between PI3K/Akt/mTOR and toll like receptor/ nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (TLR/NF-κB) signaling pathways upon bacterial infection (Li et al. 2018; Peres et al. 2015). All these point out the multiple facets of PI3K/Akt/mTOR in inflammatory regulation constituting thus important strategies to minimize the extent of host damage and immunopathology. Moreover, the activation of mTOR also has the ability to promote immune cell effector function—as in the case of virus-natural killer (NK)–infected cells, coupling the metabolic sensing, and immune responses. In this sense, an IL-18-dependent molecular mechanism drive proliferative NK cell responses upon viral infections and the IL-18-dependent upregulation of amino acid transporters induce mTORC1 activation by amino acids, an important stimuli for the mTOR-dependent regulation of innate and adaptive immune response during Trypanosoma cruzi infection (Cerbán et al. 2020; Nandagopal et al. 2014; Zimmer et al. 2019). Considering the important role of IL-18 in the activation and differentiation of various T cell populations and the pivotal role of mTOR on dendritic cells and macrophage function, it can be mentioned that mTOR and associated pathways may regulate pathogen infection activity and serve as potential anti-pathogenic and inflammatory modulatory targets (Maiese 2020; Nouwen and Everts 2020). In this regard, it is highly relevant to highlight the potential use of mTOR inhibitors for immune modulation. An illustration is the inhibition of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) propagation in vitro and their potential to prevent coronavirus disease (COVID-19) severity via AMPK activation and mTOR inhibition derived signals (Kindrachuk et al. 2015; Maiese 2020; Zheng et al. 2020). Targeting this master regulator seems to be a potential approach to prevent the consequences of microorganism infections.

The impact of parasitic diseases on mTOR signaling

Protozoan parasites can manage host signaling pathways, including the mTOR pathway, being Leishmania, Toxoplasma, and Plasmodium spp., excellent examples showing the ability of parasites to manage host mTOR pathway and consequently allowing their survival and growth in infected host cells (Chakraborty et al. 2017). mTOR inhibitors have been used for the treatment of cancer and certain immune system–mediated disorders in humans (Fruman et al. 2017; Hillmann and Fabbro 2019). Therefore, the selective inhibition of mTOR activity might come into the focus as molecular target to prevent parasitic diseases. Growing evidence suggests that targeting this pathway may provide important information about the susceptibility of different species, the specific biological significance of this, and the rationale for clinical trials. Herein, we present mainly in protozoan parasites evidences of the importance of this host signaling pathway during the infection process (Table 2 and Fig. 2).

Table 2

Importance and/or outcomes when suppressing mTOR signals on other parasitic infections

Parasite/study	mTOR signaling in host cells	Overall impact	Molecular impact	References
T. cruzi in vitro	Regulation of invasion, differentiation and replication	Decreased parasite load	Increased IL-12, IL-6, TNF and IL-1β production. Reduced arginase-1 activity and expression, and IL-10 production. Decreased iNOS expression and activity	(Cerbán et al. 2020; Ohtani et al. 2008; Rojas Márquez et al. 2018)
	Host cell susceptibility to trypomastigotes and lysosomal exocytosis	Perinuclear lysosome accumulation and lysosome biogenesis, reduced invasion by metacyclic trypomastigotes (gp82-mediated and lysosome-dependent), and increased invasion by tissue culture trypomastigotes (lysosome-independent)	Nuclear translocation of transcription factor EB (TFEB), a mTOR-associated lysosome biogenesis regulator	(Cortez et al. 2016)
		Host cell invasion by metacyclic trypomastigotes (gp82-mediated and lysosome-dependent) increased under nutritional stress	Actin cytoskeleton disruption and lysosome mobilization to the cell periphery that culminates in exocytosis	(Martins et al. 2011)
	Lysosome-dependent entry of tissue culture–derived trypomastigotes to the cells	Favored colonization of parasites	Actin cytoskeleton organization with F-actin re-arrangements at the focal adhesion sites	(Liu et al. 2008; Romano et al. 2009)
	Regulation of gene expression and protein synthesis	Metabolic modeling contributing to pathology	Inhibition of mTORC1 phosphorylation and the induced increase in the maximal respiration and spare reserve capacity	(Libisch et al. 2018)
	Angiogenesis regulation	Anti-angiogenic effects	No elevation of VEGF-A induced by T. cruzi infection upon AKT phosphorylation inhibition	(Penas et al. 2020)
	Regulation of immune T cells responses	Allow the parasites to establish the chronic disease	Reduced IL-2 production, prevention of Otub-1 protein expression and increased CTLA-4 and GRAIL expression which inhibits T cell proliferation	(Stempin et al. 2017)
T. brucei in vitro and in vivo	Regulation of cell cycle progression	Decrease in parasitemia: potent trypanocide	Altered cytokinesis and cell size/cell cycle arrest.	(Diaz-Gonzalez et al. 2011)
Echinococcus granulosus in vitro	Regulate macrophage differentiation in response to helminth infection	Induces the alternative activation of macrophages		(Hallowell et al. 2017; Wang et al. 2019)
Brugia malayi in vitro	Metabolic modulation of dendritic cells to influence the regulation of the host immune response	Inhibits mTOR pathway by downregulating the phosphorylation of mTOR and its regulatory proteins, p70S6K1 and 4E-BP1 resulting in increased autophagy	Increased phosphorylation of beclin1and induced the conversion of LC3II (microtubule-associated protein light chain 3) to LC3I and decreased levels of p62	(Narasimhan et al. 2016)
Clonorchis sinensis in vitro and in vivo	Regulation of cellular function and inflammation	Apoptosis suppression, migration, inflammation and autophagy promotion	Declined trend of p-mTOR/mTOR expression ratio and decreased p-AKT	(Shang et al. 2020)
Schistosoma japonicum in vitro	Metabolism regulation	Dynamic changes in the expression levels of genes involved in catabolism and anabolism suppression	Increased levels of phosphorylated AMPK, AKT, and mTORC1	(Xu et al. 2019)

GRAIL, E3 ubiquitin ligase; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4

Fig. 2

mTOR's participation (activation and inhibition) in the pathogenesis of Leishmania, Toxoplasma and Plasmodium parasites

Leishmania parasites and host mTOR

The therapeutic efficacy of mTOR inhibitors including GSK-2126458, rapamycin, and KU-0063794 has been evaluated in L. major-infected mice (García-Martínez et al. 2009; Khadir et al. 2018; Knight et al. 2010). Interestingly, GSK-2126458 and rapamycin decreased the parasite load and the footpad swelling of infected mice. However, the administration “in vitro” of a wide range of rapamycin doses, selected based on IC50 values could not allow the elimination of promastigotes which emphasizes the complexity to correlate “in vivo” and “in vitro” drug conversions and effects and the need to proper dose-dilution inhibitory assays and screenings (Phan et al. 2020). Immunoassay experiments indicated a higher significant increase in the ratio of interleukin (IL)-4 and IFN-γ/IL-4 in splenocytes of infected mice treated with rapamycin. Therefore, these cytokine profiles supported the remarkable polarization towards Th1 immune response. Furthermore, the increased level of CD69, as an early activation marker, was observed on splenic and lymph CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in rapamycin-treated mice (Khadir et al. 2018). It seems that, in addition to the therapeutic efficacy of mTOR inhibitors, the immunomodulatory properties and adjuvanticity of such inhibitors might suggest novel insights in vaccination strategies against leishmaniasis (Khadir et al. 2018). In 2019, a similar study confirmed the healing property of intraperitoneally injection of rapamycin (10.2 μg/dose) and the reduction of parasite burden in L. tropica infected-BALB/c mice (Khadir et al. 2019).

Other mTOR/PI3K inhibitors have been found useful against visceral leishmaniasis (VL). The half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) levels of such compounds were reported to be 0.14 up to 13.44 μM for amastigote forms of L. donovani (Phan et al. 2020). The treatment of experimental VL with mTOR/PI3K inhibitors including dactolisib (BEZ235, NVP-BEZ235), torin 2, and NVP-BGT226 also reduced the rate of Leishmania parasites by 53%, 35%, and 54% respectively, in infected livers (Phan et al. 2020). Moreover, there are other inhibitors like miransertib (ARQ 092) that potentiate mTOR-dependent autophagy in Leishmania-infected macrophages and “in vivo” (Nandan et al. 2018).

Regarding “in vitro” studies, macrophages infected by Leishmania parasites show alteration of its proteome (Hassani and Olivier 2013). The results of several “in vitro” proteomic studies on infected macrophages indicated that leishmanial-glycoprotein 63 (GP63) cleaves mTOR and inhibits (inactivates) the production of the mTORC1 (Chaparro et al. 2020; Matte and Descoteaux 2011; Shapira and Zinoviev 2011; Shertz and Cardenas 2011). The degradation of important components of the Akt/mTOR axis, containing mTOR, Akt, and the tuberous sclerosis complex-2 (TSC-2) has been implicated in that process (Matte and Descoteaux 2011). The cleavage induced in mTOR leads to the phosphorylation (activation) of 4E (eIF4E)-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1) (suppressing translation in host cell) and propagation of Leishmania parasites (Shapira and Zinoviev 2011). In parallel to mTOR cleavage and 4E-BP1 activation, the expression of type I IFN (a defensive factor against parasite) was decreased in macrophages. Rapamycin suppressed the aforementioned processes and finally the parasite replication. Interestingly, another study declared that the pharmacological activation of 4E-BPs by rapamycin increased the parasite proliferation (Jaramillo et al. 2011; Shertz and Cardenas 2011); however, genetic knockout of 4E-BP1/2 decreased the burden of Leishmania parasites in macrophages. Since the innate immune cell function is regulated by mTOR (Weichhart et al. 2015); therefore, Leishmania parasites by subverting and controlling the host translational system (through the induction of cleavage in mTOR) are able to evade the host immune system and survive. Furthermore, the dysregulation of mTORC1 pathway can tilt the metabolic balance of cells and may be associated with a number of pathological conditions (Yeh and Yong 2020). Leishmania parasites may control the metabolism of host cells in a coordinated way altering the transcription/translation rates of genes for its survival. The absence in myeloid cells of resistance factors against experimental VL-like hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) finally results in mTOR activation by B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2)–interacting protein 3 (BNIP3) which subsequently leads to lipid synthesis through nuclear translocation of activated SREBP-1c (Mesquita et al. 2020). This subsequently led to the induction of lipogenic gene transcripts resulting in a dysregulated lipid metabolism “in vivo” with lipid accumulation that favors parasite multiplication.

Another study investigated the role of Leishmania parasites in the alteration of host mRNA translation in favor of the infection. Such translational modifications mostly target central cellular functions by overexpressing proteins involved in RNA metabolism and chromatin remodeling and by inhibiting the expression of proteins relevant to antigen presentation and intracellular trafficking (Chaparro et al. 2020). In silico analyses related to such a discovery identified poly (A)-binding protein cytoplasmic 1 (PABPC1) via mTOR-activated translation and growth factor-beta (TGF-β) through activated translation depending on RNA helicase eIF4A during leishmaniasis infection. Interestingly, the use of specific inhibitors including torin-1 or rapamycin (mTOR inhibitors) and silvestrol (eIF4A-inhibitor) decreased the expression of PABPC1 and TGF-β, respectively, without affecting PABPC1 and TGF-β transcript levels (Chaparro et al. 2020). In addition, those data revealed that leishmaniasis infection–related changes during the translation of eIF4A- and mTOR-sensitive mRNAs participate in the modulation of immune responses and mRNA metabolism which are useful for the parasite reproduction (Chaparro et al. 2020).

In the early stages of Leishmania infection in macrophages, parasites inhibit the induction of autophagy processes through the activation of the Akt (or PI3K-Akt) pathway. Interestingly 1-day post infection, Leishmania parasites induce autophagy but later during the infection they inhibit the mTOR-regulated autophagy promoting, thus intracellular survival in a compensatory and time-dependent manner (Thomas et al. 2018).

The function of mTOR has been investigated in the regulation of M2 macrophage polarization for the management of innate immune homeostasis and survival of Leishmania parasites in host macrophages (Byles et al. 2013). Parasites activate the host mTOR pathway through phosphorylation of mTOR, 4E-BP1, and ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta-1 (S6K1 or p70S6K) (Byles et al. 2013). The activation of mTOR in Leishmania infection leads to the low expression of M1 macrophage markers (ROS, NO, NOX-1, iNOS, TNF-α, IL-12, and IL-1β), and the overexpression of M2 macrophage markers (arginase-1, TGF-β, IL-10, CD163, and CD206) (Biswas et al. 2012; Kumar et al. 2018; Martinez et al. 2013). In addition, the inhibition of mTOR in Leishmania infection enhances the translocation of NF-κB to the nucleus and the deactivation of STAT-3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3). Therefore, the inhibition of M2 macrophage polarization reduces the survival rate of Leishmania parasites inside macrophages.

L. donovani is able to escape from immune responses through the induction of the IL-10 production and the inhibition of IL-12 release by infected macrophages (Bhattacharya and Ali 2013). It is also known that L. donovani binds to the TLR-2 and other possible receptors involved in the phagocytosis, then driving to the modulation of IL-12/IL-10 cytokines (the decrease of IL-12 and increase of IL-10) (Cheekatla et al. 2012). Consequently, such processes activate mTOR through both PI3K-dependent and -independent mechanisms (Cheekatla et al. 2012; Fukao et al. 2002; Martin et al. 2003). These data highlighted the role of mTOR and PI3K in controlling the IL-12/IL-10 expression level in Leishmania infection. The inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin reversed the Leishmania-modulated IL-10 and IL-12 in human monocytes and THP-1-derived macrophages (the upregulation of IL-12 through PI3K/Akt pathway and decrease of IL-10) (Cheekatla et al. 2012; Harizanov and Kaftandjiev Iskren 2014). Taken together, the blockade of the mTOR pathway with rapamycin inhibits the cytokine level deviation induced by Leishmania and increases the host immune responses. It might be an attractive strategy to be developed for the treatment of leishmaniasis in the future.

CXCL16 is considered as a multifunctional chemokine that is expressed by immune cells such as macrophages in response to pathogens. However, its role remains unknown in parasitic infections (Veinotte et al. 2016). It has been recently shown that the presence and propagation of L. donovani parasites in infected bone marrow–derived macrophages (BMDM) lead to upregulation of CXCL16 in these cells (Chaparro et al. 2019). Although the link between CXCL16 and Leishmania pathogenicity needs to be investigated, it was observed that leishmanial-lipophosphoglycan (LPG) plays a critical role in the induction of CXCL16 expression. Surprisingly, the upregulation of CXCL16 in BMDM by L. donovani is dramatically affected by the activity of AKT/mTOR (Chaparro et al. 2019). More investigations should be performed to clarify the possible interactions of CXCL16, LPG, and mTOR in the pathogenicity of Leishmania parasites.

Toxoplasma parasite and host mTOR

Targeting host cell processes is an important strategy in T. gondii to manage the progression of infection in host cells (Hakimi et al. 2017). In vitro experiments on murine macrophages revealed that this apicomplexan parasite can reprogram the host cell translatome (Leroux et al. 2018). Remarkably, the translation of transcripts encoding proteins belonging to metabolic pathways and components of the translation machinery was activated during the infection. It seems that T. gondii infection activate the translation of mTOR-sensitive mRNAs and the preferential translation of transcripts with 5′-oligopyrimidine tracts and also those encoding proteins related to mitochondria to promote infection (Leroux et al. 2018). In addition, the host-parasite translational control has been determined by changes in mRNA levels of proliferating host cells, driven by gene expression changes that are consistent with mTOR activation and may serve to follow the host-parasite dynamic (Holmes et al. 2019).

The effect of T. gondii intracellular replication on the activation of host mTOR pathway has been previously studied (Wang et al. 2009b). Those results revealed that the activation of host mTOR signaling leads to the development of cell cycle and cell growth in infected host cells, independent from the growth-promoting effectors (eIF4E and S6K1). Moreover, it has been shown that Toxoplasma induces and activates autophagy in infected host cells to promote replication and such a mechanism does not produce mTOR inhibition, and it even occurs in host cells with hyperactive mTOR signaling (Orlofsky 2009; Wang et al. 2009a).

In 2018, an interesting study investigated the role of PI3K/Akt or mTOR pathway in the regulation of several inflammatory genes on Toxoplasma-infected host cells (Zhou et al. 2018). This study found that Toxoplasma parasite induced the overexpression of several genes: glutamate-cysteine ligase (GCL), glutathione S-transferase (GST), PH domain and leucine-rich repeat protein phosphatases 2 (PHLPP2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1), and casein kinase2β (CK2β). Those results also confirmed the downregulation of pigment epithelium–derived factor (PEDF) and PH domain and leucine-rich repeat protein phosphatases 1) (PHLPP1). The use of inhibitors of PI3K and mTOR showed that the regulation of most of the aforementioned genes was depending on the activation of mTOR or PI3K/Akt. Therefore, it was suggested that the protection of Toxoplasma parasite in infected host cells is probably related to the modulation of gene expression from such cells through mTOR pathway.

T. gondii excretory secretory antigens (TgESAs) can induce fetal teratogenesis or spontaneous abortion in pregnant mice infected with Toxoplasma via the dysfunction of Tregs (Chen et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2017). The inhibitory function of TgESAs on Foxp3 expression may lead to the induction of adverse pregnancy consequences in Toxoplasma-infected mice. In fact, Tregs are considered critical cells in sustaining immune tolerance of pregnancy (Guerin et al. 2009), whereas Foxp3 regulates the differentiation and functions of Tregs (Ono 2020). Current data support that TgESAs increase the gene/protein expression of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in EL4 cells (mouse ascites lymphoma lymphoblast) and therefore inducing the loss of Foxp3 (inhibition of Foxp3 expression through overexpression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR) (Chen et al. 2019). Overall, this information highlighted the critical role of TgESAs in reducing not only the expression of Foxp3 and the dysfunction of Tregs but also the occurrence of adverse pregnancy consequences in Toxoplasma-infected mice.

IL-12 and TNF are produced in primary human monocytes against T. gondii tachyzoites through a mechanism requiring tachyzoite phagocytosis. In contrast to the CD16+ CD14+ subset, CD16neg CD14+ subset is not able to secrete TNF and IL-12 in response to T. gondii exposure (Amancio et al. 2018). This deficiency of the CD16neg CD14+ subset is due to an increase of the mTORC1 activity and can be overcome directly through the rapamycin administration or indirectly via the stimulation of mTORC2 by IFNγ priming. Indeed, the inhibition of mTORC1 activity is essential for the IL-12p40 response of CD16neg CD14+ subset to T. gondii (Amancio et al. 2018).

In 2010, it was postulated that T. gondii may exploit host mTORC2 to control the organelle distribution, centrosome position, migratory response in infected host fibroblasts (Wang et al. 2010). Further experiments remarkably clarified that a continual signaling via host cell mTORC2-Akt was essential to maintain the centrosome position and the homogeneous distribution of mitochondria and lysosomes near the parasitophorous vacuole (PV) in Toxoplasma-infected host cells (Wang et al. 2010). The migratory response in fibroblasts is deeply affected by centrosome reorientation (Gomes et al. 2005). Surprisingly, the centrosome reorientation and migratory response were suppressed by Toxoplasma in infected cells (Wang et al. 2010). Therefore, Toxoplasma parasite activates the abovementioned mechanisms to reorganize and induce useful changes in the Toxoplasma-infected host cell to facilitate the pathogenesis process.

Azathioprine, a drug against the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is able to induce autophagy through the downregulation of mTORC1 (Hooper et al. 2019). In contrast, Toxoplasma enhances the activation of mTORC1 to reduce the activation of autophagy. Such mechanisms (mTORC and autophagy) are also induced by Toxoplasma parasite to escape from the immune system (Mirjalali et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2009b). On the other hand, the effect of Toxoplasma on the activation of mTORC1 might affect the azathioprine's mechanism of action in patients with IBD (Mirjalali et al. 2019). This might give warning concerning the prescription of drugs used to treat IBD such as azathioprine in patients with both IBD and toxoplasmosis.

Host cells increase their autophagic activity to fight against toxoplasmosis. In contrast, T. gondii recruits and manages the host cell–autophagic machinery to induce and maintain its pathogenicity (Gao et al. 2014). Rottlerin is a natural polyphenol that is able to increase the host cell–autophagic properties against toxoplasmosis diminishing Toxoplasma growth in infected host cells (Ietta et al. 2017). Autophagy can be synergically increased by Toxoplasma in combination with rottlerin treatment. However, the use of autophagy-specific inhibitor (chloroquine) elucidated that the anti-parasitic effect of rottlerin is autophagy-independent and probably induced by the converging inhibitory effect of Toxoplasma and this compound in host protein translation which is mediated by eIF2α phosphorylation and mTOR inhibition, respectively (Ietta et al. 2017; Torricelli et al. 2015). Altogether, these events led to increase both autophagy and the inhibition of protein synthesis, finally inducing a disruption in Toxoplasma replication. It seems that the inevitable occurrence of protein translation inhibition that is induced in concomitance with autophagy induction are important mechanisms allowing the reduction of parasite growth. This is especially observed when treatment induced inhibition of autophagy is synergically increased by Toxoplasma infection through mTORC1/4EBP (Ietta et al. 2017).

On the other hand, the exact mechanism of autophagy activation in non-hematopoietic cells infected by Toxoplasma remains unknown. The expression of CCAAT/enhancer–binding protein β (C/EBP β) has been correlated with autophagy regulation in non-hematopoietic cells (Yu et al. 2017). These authors demonstrated that C/EBP β inhibition decreased the elimination rate of Toxoplasma in non-hematopoietic cells, whereas the overexpression of C/EBP β increased the autophagy and death of parasites in infected cells. In addition, C/EBP β overexpression and C/EBP β inhibition reduced and increased mTOR activity respectively. Taken together, the results suggested that the overexpression of C/EBP β in Toxoplasma-infected non-hematopoietic cells might be associated with autophagy activation and mTOR inhibition in such cells. The mTOR activator phosphatidic acid blocked the rise of the elimination rate of parasites induced by C/EBP β upregulation, reinforcing the potential of this strategy for drug intervention against toxoplasmosis (Yu et al. 2017).

Plasmodium parasites and host mTOR

The anti-malaria properties of rapamycin have been highlighted previously showing that PfFKBP35 (an immunophilin FK506–binding protein) is a unique Plasmodium falciparum target protein for this compound (Bianchin et al. 2015; Monaghan et al. 2017). However, the mTOR inhibitory effect of rapamycin had been more largely investigated for the treatment of malaria. Atovaquone, another anti-malaria drug, also targets Akt/AMPK/mTOR pathway (mTOR inhibition) through the induction of the mitochondrial dysfunction (Ke et al. 2018).

In addition to the rapamycin therapy (as mTOR inhibitor) against Plasmodium parasites, several investigations have focused on the relations of the host mTOR pathway and the physiopathology and immunopathology of malaria infection. It was shown that P. yoelii sporozoites invasion can upregulate mTOR signaling and downregulate Bcl-2 and p53, which inhibit autophagy, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression, respectively as immune evasion strategies (Belachew 2018; Zheng et al. 2014).

Placental P. falciparum malaria might produce a local inflammatory reaction which is known as intervillositis—with impaired amino acid transport to the fetus—, and low birthweight is a related symptom (Dimasuay et al. 2017a). The mTOR pathway has an important role in the regulation of the amino acid transport and the inhibition of this mechanism in placental malaria–correlated intervillositis (Dimasuay et al. 2014; Dimasuay et al. 2017a). It seems that by restituting the placental mTOR pathway, neonatal survival and birthweight may improve. Surprisingly, the presence of a dysregulated autophagy in placental malaria–associated intervillositis can impair transplacental amino acid transport (Dimasuay et al. 2017b). Therefore, a novel therapeutic strategy based on the mTOR pathway against placental malaria might be explored.

Cerebral malaria (CM) is a common form of severe malaria caused by P. falciparum and P. vivax associated with high mortality. Although the pathogenesis of CM remains unclear, it seems that parasite features and the host’s immune responses are involved in this process (Dorovini-Zis et al. 2011; Gordon et al. 2015; Milner Jr et al. 2014; Sierro and Grau 2019). The administration of rapamycin in infected mice with CM blocked the breakdown of the blood–brain barrier, reduced the brain hemorrhage, and increased the survival rate of infected mice demonstrating the immunoregulatory functions of mTOR as well as the therapeutic properties of rapamycin in CM. In addition, such a treatment diminished the influx of T cells (CD4 and CD8) into the brain and reduced the accumulation of infected erythrocytes in the brain of infected mice with CM (Gordon et al. 2015; Mejia et al. 2017). Moreover, leukocyte trafficking to the brain and leukocyte proliferation in the brain was blocked in infected mice treated by rapamycin (Gordon et al. 2015).

In 2017, a similar study revealed the protective properties of rapamycin in experimental CM. This study indicated that rapamycin induced the reduction of neuropathology and death via the regulation of host responses to CM infection (Mejia et al. 2017). After the treatment with rapamycin, the parasite cytoadherence was inhibited through the downregulation of CD36 in peripheral organs such as white adipose tissue. In addition, the alteration of splenic immune response by decreasing activated T cells with migratory phenotype and enhancing the local cytotoxic T cell activation were observed after the administration of rapamycin in CM cases. Furthermore, the levels of ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule 1) from the brain endothelial and brain pathology were reduced. All the aforementioned alterations led to parasite elimination while decreasing CD8 T cell migration in the infected brain. Overall, the induced vascular activation, pleiotropic effects on host immune responses, and the parasite sequestration might further suggest the clinical use of rapamycin in the treatment of CM.

AMPK is a vital metabolic sensor that plays a major role in maintaining energy homeostasis in both normal physiological and pathological conditions. In addition, this enzyme is correlated with autophagy, a process that is observed during pathologic conditions and metabolic stress (Weisová et al. 2011; Williams et al. 2011). In 2018, the results of an interesting study identified that levels of genes encoding AMPK catalytic subunits α1 and α2 were downregulated, and there was also a decrease in protein levels of activated AMPK in infected brains with CM. Surprisingly, this study suggested that the use of AMPK-activating drugs might reduce morbidity related to CM (Apoorv et al. 2018). As previously explained in this review, mTOR is able to inhibit autophagy and AMPK may inhibit mTOR to boost autophagy. Most probably, the AMPK upstream regulatory function over mTOR in T cells finally impact CM consequences (Gordon et al. 2015). More investigation regarding the relationships between autophagy, mTOR, and AMPK might provide more information for the development of effective AMPK-activating drugs against CM.

It has been shown that the immunometabolic modulation via dietary restriction (DR) in infected mice with CM inhibits neuropathology in severe malaria. DR can reduce parasite accumulation in the brain and enhance parasite clearance in the spleen in CM-infected mice although DR does not affect parasite growth (Mejia et al. 2015). Leptin, a host-derived adipokine involved in appetite signaling, is essential for CM pathology in experimental models being immunomodulation and control of the energy balance possible functions of leptin (Lago et al. 2008; Mejia et al. 2015). In this sense, DR reduces the level of leptin and the activity of mTORC1 in T cells (Mejia et al. 2015). Regarding T cells, very recently it has been shown that CD4+ T cell led to exhaustion during malaria which is associated with reduced mTOR activity (Villegas-Mendez et al. 2020). Interestingly, leptin administration abrogates the reduction of mTORC1 activity in T cells so the administration of leptin signaling inhibitors and rapamycin reduce the cerebral pathology of infected mice experimentally. Therefore, it seems that mTORC1 and leptin can provide an important link between nutrition, immunometabolism, and experimental CM pathology. These highlight the clinical importance of the interplay between the nutrient/energy sensor mTORC1 and leptin.

Before starting the Plasmodium-intraerythrocytic stage and clinical manifestations, such parasites replicate in the liver stage affecting different signaling pathways in the infected hepatocytes (Kaushanskya et al. 2013). These authors demonstrated that the downregulation of the pro-death protein p53 in P. yoelii infected hepatocytes was induced by the propagation of the parasite and facilitated the P. yoelii survival. Those interesting results also indicated the increased level of anti-apoptotic signaling proteins p-Bcl-2 and p-PI3K-Akt, and the pro-proliferative phosphorylated states of mTOR, as other signaling pathways altered in P. yoelii infected hepatocytes. Such data suggest that the increased level of mTOR probably leads to autophagy inhibition which consequently favors parasite survival.

Finally, it is also imperative to point out the important and similar impact of other parasite infections on mTOR pathway and its inhibition, showing the broad regulatory functions of this kinase on the majority of the mammalian parasitic infections (Table 2).

The target of rapamycin in parasites

The target of rapamycin pathway is also present in parasites themselves with high similarities between mTOR and parasite TORs which makes mTOR/PI3K inhibitors highly effective against parasites both “in vivo” and “in vitro” (Diaz-Gonzalez et al. 2011; Phan et al. 2020). In parasites, there are orthologues with different regulatory functions including cell cycle regulation and protein synthesis or cell polarization and cytokinesis (Barquilla et al. 2008; Barquilla and Navarro 2009). It has been shown that Leishmania TOR3 is essential for acidocalcisome biogenesis and the development of leishmaniasis in animals. TOR3-mutant Leishmania parasites were not able to survive and propagate in macrophages. The disability of this strain to cause leishmaniasis in animal models confirmed that the lower infectivity was due to a defective formation of acidocalcisome (Da Silva and Beverley 2010). Additionally, TOR3-Leishmania mutants exhibited defects in osmoregulation and were highly sensitive to glucose starvation. Additionally, TOR4 has been reported in T. brucei and is associated with an Armadillo domain–containing protein (TbArmtor), an important vault protein, and LST8 (lethal with sec-13 protein 8) to compose a unique TOR complex, TbTORC4. The inhibition of TbTOR4 led to the irreversible differentiation of the Trypanosome parasite into the quiescent form (Barquilla et al. 2012; Saldivia et al. 2013). According to the aforementioned roles of TORs in parasites, the inhibition of TOR kinase functions in trypanosomatids might be further exploitable for innovative treatments.

Conclusions and future directions

The current review attempted to provide information regarding manipulations of host mTOR signaling networks mainly by Leishmania, Toxoplasma, and Plasmodium but highlighting a global targeting by parasites. It appears clear that the survival, propagation, and pathogenicity progress of the protozoan parasites are deeply dependent on the alteration of host vital signaling and connected pathways such as mTOR and autophagy. Parasites have developed sophisticated strategies to target the metabolism of the immune cells to subvert potential deleterious immune responses acting on metabolic pathways controlled by this master regulator. These and the roles of mTOR in regulating the development and differentiation of cell subsets of the innate and adaptive immune response make that therefore, targeting such pathways might further open new venues in the treatment of parasitic diseases. Accordingly, the mTOR inhibitory function of rapamycin served as a strategy to deeper understand complex signaling and modulatory molecular events that parasites alter to successfully achieve infection. Overall, research on new non-toxic compounds with ample inhibitory properties and/or combinational kinase inhibitor treatments against different species of parasites might facilitate novel insights and developments towards their clinical usage. Thus, further investigations are needed to explore more biological functions of the mTOR signaling pathway in different cells and host-parasite relationships. The promising host mTOR modulation support that checking out more details regarding functions of mTORC2, cooperation and integration of mTORC1 and mTORC2, other upstream or downstream potential regulators and the effect of dysfunction or dysregulation of such components in health and parasitic diseases. It might be useful to understand a number of sensing stimuli/stresses and the underlying molecular cascades and checkpoints with the aim of developing highly selective novel intervention strategies targeting pathways that regulate host and parasite metabolism. Finally, the key functions of parasite TORs and their high similarities with mTOR can further facilitate this goal.