Literature DB >> 33533726

Heart Rate Variability and Firstbeat Method for Detecting Sleep Stages in Healthy Young Adults: Feasibility Study.

Liisa Kuula1, Anu-Katriina Pesonen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polysomnography (PSG) is considered the only reliable way to distinguish between different sleep stages. Wearable devices provide objective markers of sleep; however, these devices often rely only on accelerometer data, which do not enable reliable sleep stage detection. The alteration between sleep stages correlates with changes in physiological measures such as heart rate variability (HRV). Utilizing HRV measures may thus increase accuracy in wearable algorithms.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the validity of the Firstbeat sleep analysis method, which is based on HRV and accelerometer measurements. The Firstbeat method was compared against PSG in a sample of healthy adults. Our aim was to evaluate how well Firstbeat distinguishes sleep stages, and which stages are most accurately detected with this method.
METHODS: Twenty healthy adults (mean age 24.5 years, SD 3.5, range 20-37 years; 50% women) wore a Firstbeat Bodyguard 2 measurement device and a Geneactiv actigraph, along with taking ambulatory SomnoMedics PSG measurements for two consecutive nights, resulting in 40 nights of sleep comparisons. We compared the measures of sleep onset, wake, combined stage 1 and stage 2 (light sleep), stage 3 (slow wave sleep), and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep between Firstbeat and PSG. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy from the 30-second epoch-by-epoch data.
RESULTS: In detecting wake, Firstbeat yielded good specificity (0.77), and excellent sensitivity (0.95) and accuracy (0.93) against PSG. Light sleep was detected with 0.69 specificity, 0.67 sensitivity, and 0.69 accuracy. Slow wave sleep was detected with 0.91 specificity, 0.72 sensitivity, and 0.87 accuracy. REM sleep was detected with 0.92 specificity, 0.60 sensitivity, and 0.84 accuracy. There were two measures that differed significantly between Firstbeat and PSG: Firstbeat underestimated REM sleep (mean 18 minutes, P=.03) and overestimated wake time (mean 14 minutes, P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports utilizing HRV alongside an accelerometer as a means for distinguishing sleep from wake and for identifying sleep stages. The Firstbeat method was able to detect light sleep and slow wave sleep with no statistically significant difference to PSG. Firstbeat underestimated REM sleep and overestimated wake time. This study suggests that Firstbeat is a feasible method with sufficient validity to measure nocturnal sleep stage variation. ©Liisa Kuula, Anu-Katriina Pesonen. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 03.02.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actigraphy; electroencephalogram; heart rate; polysomnography; rapid eye movements; sleep

Year:  2021        PMID: 33533726      PMCID: PMC7889416          DOI: 10.2196/24704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth        ISSN: 2291-5222            Impact factor:   4.773


  26 in total

1.  Detection of Nocturnal Slow Wave Sleep Based on Cardiorespiratory Activity in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Xi Long; Pedro Fonseca; Ronald M Aarts; Reinder Haakma; Jerome Rolink; Steffen Leonhardt
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 5.772

Review 2.  Wearables and the medical revolution.

Authors:  Jessilyn Dunn; Ryan Runge; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Estimating oxygen consumption from heart rate and heart rate variability without individual calibration.

Authors:  Juhani Smolander; Marjo Ajoviita; Tanja Juuti; Ari Nummela; Heikki Rusko
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.273

4.  Sympathetic-nerve activity during sleep in normal subjects.

Authors:  V K Somers; M E Dyken; A L Mark; F M Abboud
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-02-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effects of wake and sleep stages on the 24-h autonomic control of blood pressure and heart rate in recumbent men.

Authors:  P Van de Borne; H Nguyen; P Biston; P Linkowski; J P Degaute
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-02

Review 6.  Wearable Sleep Technology in Clinical and Research Settings.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Aimée Goldstone; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Prevalence of narcolepsy and other sleep disorders and frequency of diagnostic tests from 2013-2016 in insured patients actively seeking care.

Authors:  John Acquavella; Reena Mehra; Morgan Bron; Joanna M-H Suomi; Gregory P Hess
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  The interaction between sleep and thermoregulation in adults and neonates.

Authors:  Veronique Bach; Frédéric Telliez; Jean Pierre Libert
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.609

9.  Reproducibility of Heart Rate Variability Is Parameter and Sleep Stage Dependent.

Authors:  David Herzig; Prisca Eser; Ximena Omlin; Robert Riener; Matthias Wilhelm; Peter Achermann
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Accuracy of Wristband Fitbit Models in Assessing Sleep: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shahab Haghayegh; Sepideh Khoshnevis; Michael H Smolensky; Kenneth R Diller; Richard J Castriotta
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pathobiology of Second-Generation Antihistamines Related to Sleep in Urticaria Patients.

Authors:  Caroline Mann; Joanna Wegner; Hans-Günter Weeß; Petra Staubach
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.