| Literature DB >> 33533107 |
Hong Li1, Jenny Manuela Kreiner1, Ann Rann Wong1, Mingdi Li1, Yue Sun1, Leyao Lu2, Jianping Liu3, Angela Wei Hong Yang1.
Abstract
Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) has long been used for allergic rhinitis (AR). This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical effects and safety of oral CHM for AR by comparing it to Western medications (WM). Nineteen databases were searched up to May 27, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of CHM on the primary or secondary outcomes comparing to WM, in any age of the patients, were included. The pooled results were expressed as mean difference, standardized mean difference, or odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Eighteen RCTs were included and 17 of them were evaluated in the meta-analysis. CHM may improve total nasal symptom scores, individual symptom scores (rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, sneezing, and nasal itching), quality of life, and recurrence rate, compared to antihistamines (loratadine and chlorpheniramine). Only mild and transient adverse events of CHM were reported. However, there were no significant differences in some subgroup analyses in total nasal symptom scores, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, sneezing, nasal itching, and SF-36. Due to the small number of included studies, poor quality of trial design, and substantial heterogeneities, the potential of CHM for AR should be validated in large, multicenter, and well-designed RCTs in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Hay fever; allergic diseases; complementary and alternative medicine; nasal symptoms; natural products; traditional Chinese medicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33533107 PMCID: PMC8457023 DOI: 10.1002/ptr.7037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Phytother Res ISSN: 0951-418X Impact factor: 6.388