Literature DB >> 33532993

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus for labour analgesia during first stage of labour: a sequential allocation trial to determine the effective interval time between boluses of a fixed volume of 2.5 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% plus fentanyl 8 µg·mL-1.

Daniel Shatalin1, Cristian Arzola2, Kristi Downey2, Xiang Y Ye3, Jose C A Carvalho2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) time interval between boluses of 2.5 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% with fentanyl 8 µg·mL-1 to produce effective analgesia in 90% of women (EI90) during the first stage of labour.
METHODS: In a double-blind sequential allocation trial using a biased coin up-and-down design to determine the EI90, the PIEB boluses of 2.5 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 8 µg·mL-1 were delivered at varying intervals-60, 50, 40, and 30 min. The primary outcome was the adequate response of the patient to the PIEB regimen, defined as no use of supplemental analgesia for six hours or until the first stage of labour was completed, whichever came first. The secondary outcomes were the upper sensory block level to ice, motor block and hypotension. The isotonic regression with extrapolation approach was used to estimate the EI90.
RESULTS: In the 20 women studied, the estimated EI90 was 20 (95% CI, 5.9 to 28.8) min. For the secondary outcomes, we classified women into those assigned to 30 min (16 women) and those assigned to more than 30 min (four women). The median upper sensory block for women in the 30-min group and more than 30 min were T6 (or T5) and T7, respectively. No participants experienced motor block. Hypotension occurred in one patient in the 30-min group.
CONCLUSION: The estimated EI90 for boluses of 2.5 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% with fentanyl 8 µg·mL-1 was 20 (95% CI, 5.9 to 28.8) min. These results suggest that there is no advantage in using this regimen compared with those reported in the literature using the same dose of bupivacaine in concentrations of 0.0625% and 0.125%. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03735771); registered 7 November 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidural; Labor analgesia; Programmed intermittent epidural boluses

Year:  2021        PMID: 33532993     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-01922-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  4 in total

1.  Epidural infusion: continuous or bolus?

Authors:  A M Kaynar; K B Shankar
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Distribution of solution in the epidural space: examination by cryomicrotome section.

Authors:  Quinn Hogan
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

3.  Epidural contrast spread in the porcine model: bolus versus infusion.

Authors:  Jacob Cole; Scott Hughey
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus and Continuous Infusion as the Background Infusion for Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia.

Authors:  Jiqian Xu; Jie Zhou; Hairong Xiao; Shangwen Pan; Jie Liu; You Shang; Shanglong Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  A comparison of maternal fear of childbirth, labor pain intensity and intrapartum analgesic consumption between primiparas and multiparas: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yongfang Deng; Yan Lin; Liyuan Yang; Qiuxia Liang; Bailing Fu; Huixian Li; Huizhu Zhang; Yan Liu
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2021-09-16

2.  Optimization of programmed intermittent epidural bolus volume for different concentrations of ropivacaine in labor analgesia: a biased coin up-and-down sequential allocation trial.

Authors:  Xin Ran; Shuzhi Zhou; Kailan Cao; Peng He
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.105

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.