Literature DB >> 33532736

Protocol for assaying chromatin accessibility using ATAC-seq in plants.

Fu-Xiang Wang1,2, Guan-Dong Shang1,2, Lian-Yu Wu1,3, Yan-Xia Mai1, Jian Gao1,2, Zhou-Geng Xu1,2, Jia-Wei Wang1,3.   

Abstract

Open or accessible regions of the genome are the primary positions of binding sites for transcription factors and chromatin regulators. Transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) can probe chromatin accessibility in the intact nucleus. Here, we describe a protocol to generate ATAC-seq libraries from fresh Arabidopsis thaliana tissues and establish an easy-to-use bioinformatic analysis pipeline. Our method could be applied to other plants and other tissues and allows for the reliable detection of changes in chromatin accessibility throughout plant growth and development. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Wang et al. (2020).
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Gene Expression; Model Organisms; Sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33532736      PMCID: PMC7821035          DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  STAR Protoc        ISSN: 2666-1667


Before you begin

Experimental considerations

Here, we describe a detailed ATAC-seq protocol as applied to embryos and seedlings in Arabidopsis thaliana. This protocol can also be used for other plants and other tissues. Before beginning this protocol, please ensure that your core facility has the instruments compatible for flow sorting as the sorting step is extremely important for acquiring high-quality data. To ensure success, please perform pilot experiments to detect the position of nuclei with different ploidy levels in the peak diagram and to set appropriate gates for FACS sorting.

Key resources table

Materials and equipment

The lysis buffer and wash buffer can be stored at 4°C for several months. Please add spermine and 2-mercaptoethanol before experiments. Lysis buffer Wash buffer CRITICAL: Both 2-mercaptoethanol and spermine have pungent odors, please add them in a fume hood. This protocol describes cell nuclear FACS using a BD FACSAria II machine, any other FACS machine can be used as well. The FACS parameters used here are: nozzle size (70 μm), psi (70), sorting speed (1), sheath fluid (1× PBS).

Step-by-step method details

Extraction of cell nuclei

Timing: 1–2 h This step describes the procedure for preparation of the nuclei suspension. Steps 1 and 2 are used for preparation of cell nuclei from embryos, while steps 3 and 4 are used for seedlings. Approximately 200 embryos at the late-cotyledon stage were collected with a 1 mL injection syringe under a dissecting microscope at 25°C. The collected embryos were placed on a 3.5 cm diameter round dish supplemented with B5 agar media (Figure 1A). The B5 agar will keep the embryos alive. The dissected embryos were transferred into a 12 cm long square dish with 500 μL pre-chilled lysis buffer on ice.
Figure 1

Generation of nuclei suspension

(A) The Arabidopsis embryos at the late-cotyledon stage were collected on the B5 agar.

(B) The nuclei lysis suspension of embryos after filtering.

(C) The 3-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were collected on the B5 agar.

(D) The nuclei lysis suspension of seedlings after filtering.

Generation of nuclei suspension (A) The Arabidopsis embryos at the late-cotyledon stage were collected on the B5 agar. (B) The nuclei lysis suspension of embryos after filtering. (C) The 3-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings were collected on the B5 agar. (D) The nuclei lysis suspension of seedlings after filtering. Finely chop embryos with a double-sided blade to release nuclei on ice in fume hood. The embryos naturally settle at the bottom of the lysis buffer, so we can collect the materials together and repeatedly cut them. Due to the small volume of embryos, please cut them repeatedly to release more nucleus until the color of the lysis buffer is yellow-green (Figure 1B), which should take approximately 10 min. 200 embryos should provide a sufficient number of nuclei. Approximately 3-day-old 150 - 200 seedlings grown on B5 agar were collected with forceps at RT. The seedlings were transferred to a 12 cm long square dish with 500 μL pre-chilled lysis buffer on ice. Finely chop seedlings with a double-sided blade to release nuclei on ice in fume hood. For seedlings, 5 min of chopping is enough. The color of the lysis buffer will be bright green after chopping. Filter the slurry through a 40 μm filter into 15 mL collection tubes on ice. Rinse the petri dish with 1.5 mL lysis buffer and filter into the same 15 mL collection tube. The final nuclei suspension is about 2 mL in volume and the color should appear yellow-green. CRITICAL: For acquiring more intact nuclei, we recommend extensively chopping plant materials in lysis buffer rather than grinding them in liquid nitrogen which leads to more tissue fragments that will disturb FACS.

FACS of cell nuclei

Timing: 1–5 h This step describes the procedure for sorting nuclei by FACS. The nuclei suspensions are stained with DAPI for flow cytometric analysis. Set up an unstained control without DAPI. It is not necessary to estimate the density of nuclei suspension in this step because we will sort ∼50,000 nuclei per replicate to ensure repeatability. The amount of nuclei suspension required for control samples is flexible. The purpose of control is to determine the appropriate voltage needed to exclude the interference of other particles. Add 2 μL of 1 mg/mL DAPI to the nuclei suspension in a sample tube, flick gently to mix. Select parameters including FSC-A (forward scatter-A, particle size), SSC-A (side scatter-A, internal complexity), DAPI-A (intensity of DAPI staining), and DAPI-W (voltage pulse width). Use the unstained control and stained samples to set appropriate photomultiplier tube (PMT) voltages and adjust compensations on a BD FACSAria II cell analyzer. Create gates for the samples according to the position of 2C or 4C nuclei (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Gate set for FACS

(A) FACS histogram of embryo nuclei suspension. The DAPI-A-2C and 4C represent cell ploidy with 2 times and 4 times, respectively. Only DAPI-A-2C cell nuclei was sorted.

(B) FACS histogram of seedling nuclei suspension. The DAPI-A-2C, -4C, and -8C represent cell ploidy with 2 times, 4 times, and 8 times, respectively. All DAPI-A-2C, -4C, and -8C cell nuclei were sorted.

Gate set for FACS (A) FACS histogram of embryo nuclei suspension. The DAPI-A-2C and 4C represent cell ploidy with 2 times and 4 times, respectively. Only DAPI-A-2C cell nuclei was sorted. (B) FACS histogram of seedling nuclei suspension. The DAPI-A-2C, -4C, and -8C represent cell ploidy with 2 times, 4 times, and 8 times, respectively. All DAPI-A-2C, -4C, and -8C cell nuclei were sorted. Add 500 μL of lysis buffer to a 10 mL BD collect tube and collect a total of 50,000 events per sample (each sample per tube). The nozzle size, psi, and sorting speed of FACS are 70 μm, 70, and 1, respectively. 200 embryos and 150–200 3-day-old seedlings are enough material for getting 50,000 nuclei. Centrifuge at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Since we cannot see the pellet at the bottom of the tube after centrifugation, please leave ∼50 μL of liquid to avoid nuclei loss when discarding the supernatant. Pipette 1 mL of pre-chilled wash buffer into the centrifuge tube. Centrifuge at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and discard the supernatant as much as possible. Immature embryo cells at late-cotyledon developmental stage rarely divide. DAPI-A detected nuclei almost with 2C from FACS (Figure 2A). The nuclei were sorted into lysis buffer as plant nuclei do not remain intact in PBS buffer that is used for FACS.

ATAC-seq library constructing

Timing: 5–8 h This step describes the procedure for generation of ATAC-seq library. We use the TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit V2 for Illumina including 5× TTBL and TTE Mix V50 (Vazyme, TD50102; see manual at http://www.vazymebiotech.com/products_detail/productId=70.html) to construct ATAC-seq libraries. We use the MinElute Reaction Cleanup Kit including Buffer PB, PE and EB (Qiagen) to purify transposed DNA. Prepare the transposition master mix in a 200 μL Lobind tube (Eppendorf) on ice. Add reagents in the order shown below. The volume of nuclei suspension after step 14 is variable. Please sure that the remaining nuclear suspension is less than 34.5 μL since the total reaction volume for transposition is 50 μL. It is not necessary to optimize reaction conditions (e.g., transposition time) when working with different initial volumes or numbers of nuclei. Dispense master mix into a PCR tube containing nuclear suspension. Pipette to mix. Load the tube into a thermal cycler pre-warmed to 37°C and incubate for 30 min with occasional gentle mixing to keep the nuclei in suspension. Add 3–5 volumes of Buffer PB to 1 volume of the PCR sample. Transfer the mixture to a spin column that is situated in a provided 2 mL collection tube. Centrifuge at 13,523 × g for 1 min at 4°C. Discard the flow-through and add 750 μL of Buffer PE to the spin column. Centrifuge at 13,523 × g for 1 min at 4°C. Discard the flow-through and centrifuge the column for an additional 2 min. Place column in a clean 1.5 mL DNA Lobind microcentrifuge tube and add 11 μL of buffer EB to the center of the column for 2 min. Centrifuge at 13,523 × g for 1 min at 4°C. Pause point: Samples can be safely stored overnight at 4°C or −20°C. We use the TruePrep DNA Index Kit V2 for Illumina sequencing (Vazyme) and NEBNext high-fidelity PCR mix to amplify transposed DNA. Prepare the PCR amplification mix in a 0.2 mL PCR tube on ice as follows: Incubate the reaction in a thermo cycler with the following PCR program. To determine the number of additional PCR cycles needed to adequately amplify the DNA library, prepare the quantitative PCR (qPCR) Library Amplification Mix as follows: Incubate the reaction in a qPCR thermocycler with the following PCR program. To determine the optimal number of cycles needed to amplify the remaining 45 μL of each library, view the linear fluorescence versus cycle number plot on the qPCR machine once the reaction is finished. The cycle number at which the fluorescence for a given reaction is at 1/3 of its maximum is the number of additional cycles (N) that each library requires for adequate amplification (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Schematic diagram of qPCR

The maximum of fluorescence is 2,000. As such, one-third of the maximum is ~666, and the number of PCR cycles should be 9 (red line).

Schematic diagram of qPCR The maximum of fluorescence is 2,000. As such, one-third of the maximum is ~666, and the number of PCR cycles should be 9 (red line). Incubate the remaining reaction in a thermocycler with the following PCR program. Add 67.5 μL (1.5× of sample volume) resuspended Ampure XP beads to the PCR reaction. Mix well by pipetting up and down at least 10 times. Alternatively, samples can be mixed by vortexing for 3–5 s. If Ampure XP beads are stored at 4°C, please pre-warm to 25°C for at least 30 min and vortex before use. Incubate samples on the bench for at least 5 min at 25°C. Place the tube on an appropriate magnetic stand to separate the beads from the supernatant. Quickly centrifuge the sample to collect the liquid from the sides of the tube before placing it on the magnetic stand if necessary. After 5 min, carefully remove and discard the supernatant. Be careful not to disturb the beads that contain bound DNA. Add 200 μL of freshly prepared 80% ethanol to the tube while in the magnetic stand. Incubate at 25°C for 30 s, and carefully remove and discard the supernatant. Repeat steps 34 and 35 once for a total of two washes. Be sure to remove all visible liquid after the second wash. Briefly centrifuge the tube on a benchtop centrifuge if necessary. Air-dry the beads for up to 5 min while the tube is on the magnetic stand with the lid open. Do not over-dry the beads. This may result in a lower recovery of DNA. Elute the samples when the beads are still dark-brown and glossy looking, but when all visible liquid has evaporated. When the beads turn lighter brown and start to crack, it shows beads are too dry. Remove the tube from the magnetic stand. Elute the DNA from the beads by adding 30 μL EB buffer provided by Qiagen. Mix well by pipetting up and down 10 times, or on a vortex mixer. Incubate for at least 2 min at room temperature. Quickly spin the sample to collect the liquid from the sides of the tube if necessary. Place the tube on the magnetic stand for 5 min. Transfer 28 μL to a new 1.5 mL tube. Libraries can be stored at −20°C. The concentration of the library can be checked by NanoDrop.

ATAC-seq library quality assessment

This step describes the procedure for assessment of ATAC-seq library. We pipette 20 μL of library samples and send them to Novogene for library quality determination and sequencing (Figure 4). The library quality platform: NGS3K; Sequencing platform: HiseqPE150, paired-end.
Figure 4

Assessment of ATAC-seq library

(A–D) The purified ATAC-seq DNA libraries of 4 samples on NGS3K platform. Em, immature embryo; G3, 3-day-old seedlings grown on the B5 agar plate.

If we started with 50,000 sorted nuclei, 20 μL of library sample is enough for quality assessment and sequencing. Most sequencing companies perform library quality analysis before sequencing. Assessment of ATAC-seq library (A–D) The purified ATAC-seq DNA libraries of 4 samples on NGS3K platform. Em, immature embryo; G3, 3-day-old seedlings grown on the B5 agar plate.

Expected outcomes

We performed ATAC-seq on four samples following this protocol. The resultant datasets inform us of the dynamics of accessible chromatin regions during seed germination. First, our result shows the distribution of open chromatin regions along the genome (Figure 5A). Second, the analysis of differences between samples suggest the major variable regions and the principal biological processes encoded therein by gene ontology (GO) enrichment annotation (Figures 5C and 5D). Finally, we inferred putative transcription factor binding sites which are enriched in open regions by HOMER-motif analysis (Figures 5B and 5E).
Figure 5

Results of ATAC-seq analysis

(A) The genome-wide distribution of ATAC-seq peaks. Window size: gene body ± 3.0 kb.

(B) HOMER DNA-motif enrichment analyses of accessible peaks. The enrichment of binding motifs of 8 transcription factors per sample are shown.

(C) Volcano plot showing the genes associated with decreased (blue) or increased (red) accessible peaks between immature embryos (Em) and 3-day-old seedlings (G3). The known genes related to seed or embryo development are shown. Ns (gray in color), no difference between two samples.

(D) GO term analyses showing distinct gene ontologies of target genes linked to differentially accessible peaks (G3 versus Em). The selected 20 enriched GO biological processes are indicated. The −log10(p.adj) is given.

(E) HOMER DNA-motif enrichment analyses of differentially accessible peaks (G3 versus Em). The enrichment of binding motifs of 5 transcription factors per sample are shown.

Results of ATAC-seq analysis (A) The genome-wide distribution of ATAC-seq peaks. Window size: gene body ± 3.0 kb. (B) HOMER DNA-motif enrichment analyses of accessible peaks. The enrichment of binding motifs of 8 transcription factors per sample are shown. (C) Volcano plot showing the genes associated with decreased (blue) or increased (red) accessible peaks between immature embryos (Em) and 3-day-old seedlings (G3). The known genes related to seed or embryo development are shown. Ns (gray in color), no difference between two samples. (D) GO term analyses showing distinct gene ontologies of target genes linked to differentially accessible peaks (G3 versus Em). The selected 20 enriched GO biological processes are indicated. The −log10(p.adj) is given. (E) HOMER DNA-motif enrichment analyses of differentially accessible peaks (G3 versus Em). The enrichment of binding motifs of 5 transcription factors per sample are shown.

Quantification and statistical analysis

ATAC-seq analysis pipeline

This step describes the bioinformatic pipeline used for the analysis of ATAC-seq dataset and identification of differentially accessible peaks. We will describe the basic analysis pipeline of processing and analyzing ATAC-seq including data filtering, quality control, matching, difference analysis, motif prediction, and GO set enrichment analysis as shown below. For a detailed analysis process and related code refer to the following link: https://github.com/WangLab-SIPPE/2020STARProtocols_pipeline. For each library, raw.fastq was trimmed by fastp v0.20.0 with the parameters "-a CTGTCTCTTATACACATCT." After trimming, FastQC v0.11.7 and MulitQC v1.6 were performed as quality control to obtain clean fq files. Reads were aligned using Bowtie2 v2.3.4.3 to the Arabidopsis genome (TAIR10). Alternative align tools such as Bwa mean can be chosen. The resulting SAM file containing mapped reads were converted to BAM format, sorted, and indexed using Samtools v1.9. The biological replicates were merged by Samtools v1.9. The sorted BAM were processed to remove duplicated and organellar reads by sambamba v0.6.7 and bedtools v2.25.0. An alternative tool to mark and remove duplicated reads is Picard. To normalize and visualize the individual and merged replicate datasets, the BAM files were converted to bigwig using bamCoverage provided by deepTools v3.1.2 with a bin size of 10 bp and normalized by Bin Per Million mapped reads. MACS2 v2.1.2 was used to call peaks with default parameters "-t ATAC.bam -f BAMPE -g 1.1e8." For differentially accessible region analyses, we used "DiffBind" with the parameter "minOverlap = 1." "DiffBind" was also used to calculate merged peak locations, based on the outer boundaries of overlapping peaks from all the analyzed samples. The peaks called by MACS2 and differential peaks identified by DiffBind v2.14.0 were annotated by TxDb.Athaliana.BioMart.plantsmart28 and ChIPseeker v1.22.0 package with the "annotatePeak" function. The gene promoters are defined as ± 3.0 kb from the transcription start site (TSS). The differential regions were scanned for the enrichment of motifs using the "findMotifsGenome.pl" function provided by HOMER v4.10 with default parameters. The GO and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of differentially accessible regions were performed using clusterProfiler v3.14.0 and org.At.tair.db v3.10.0.

Limitations

This protocol is designed for fresh plant materials. If the materials are stored at −80°C or in liquid nitrogen, it will lead to a high amount of tissue debris, which can interfere with the flow sorting of intact nuclei.

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

Sequenced reads have a low mapping rate.

Potential solution

There are several reasons that can cause low mapping rates. Please ensure that all solutions, equipment, and work areas are free of DNA. Wear a mask and gloves when chopping samples and constructing libraries. Avoid excessive PCR cycles during amplification. In general, 12–17 cycles are sufficient.

Problem 2

Poor data quality. This might be caused by low quality or a low amount of cell nuclei. Please make sure that fresh samples are used, and an appropriate sorting speed and sheath pressure are selected.

Problem 3

Sequence reads do not map primarily to non-coding regions. When you find that mapped sequences were mostly aligned to exonic regions in the reference genome, this might be caused by a low quality of nuclei or exogenous DNA pollution. Low-quality cell nuclei might cause nucleosome instability, which leads to an increase in the mapping rate at non-signal regions. To fix this problem, please make sure that only high-quality cell nuclei are used for the Tn5 tagmentation. As such, the examination of the sorted nuclei under a microscope is strongly recommended. Otherwise, 75% ethanol or DNA cleaner can be used to remove exogenous DNAs, and thereby improving your data quality.

Problem 4

The differentially accessible regions are far less as expected. This problem can also be caused by poor data quality. Please check peak numbers, plot profiles, and the correlation between replicates. You can achieve these using the "plotCorrelation" function in deeptools, "plotPCA" function in DESeq2, or the "dba.plotPCA" function in DESeq2. Meanwhile, batch effects should also be considered. You can introduce the batch in the design effect with block parameter "dba.contrast" in DiffBind. Finally, you can try different ways to probe differentially accessible regions. According to a recent report (Reske et al., 2020), different bioinformatic tools may lead to different results.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Jia-Wei Wang (jwwang@sippe.ac.cn).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique materials.

Data and code availability

The data can be found online at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1534580720305517 The analysis code can be found online at https://github.com/WangLab-SIPPE/2020STARProtocols_pipeline.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Gamborg B-5 basal mediumPhyto TechnologyCat#G398
SucroseABCONECat#57501
2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES)BBI Life SciencesCat#145224948
PhytagelSigma-AldrichCat#7101052-1
Agar Bacteriological GradeShanghai JiafengCat#H8145
Triton X-100Sigma-AldrichCat#9002931
KClSigma-AldrichCat#7447407
NaClSigma-AldrichCat#7647145
MgCl2·6H2OSigma-AldrichCat#7791186
Tris baseSigma-AldrichCat#77861
DAPIAAT BioquestCat#28718903
2-MercaptoethanolRuibioCat#60242
SpermineSigma-AldrichCat#85590
Eva green dyeBiotiumCat#31000
Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymeraseThermo Fisher ScientificCat#022021
Complete protease inhibitor cocktailMerckCat#04693132001

Critical commercial assays

MinElute Reaction Cleanup KitQIAGENCat#28204
TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit v2Vazyme BiotechCat#TD50102
TruePrep Index Kit v2Vazyme BiotechCat#TD202
2× NEBNext high-fidelity PCR mixNew England BiolabsCat#M0541L
AMPure beadsBeckmanCat#A63880

Deposited data

ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, and RNA-seq experiment dataThis paperBioProject PRJCA002620,Beijing Institute of Genomics Data Center (http://bigd.big.ac.cn)

Experimental models: organisms/strains

A. thaliana: Col-0N/AN/A

Software and algorithms

R version 3.6The R FoundationRRID: SCR_001905 https://www.r-project.orgl
Adobe Photoshop CC 2018Adobe AcrobatN/A
Adobe Illustrator CC 2018Adobe AcrobatN/A
Fastp(Chen et al., 2018)RRID: SCR_016962 https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp
FastQC v0.11.7FastQCRRID:SCR_014583 http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
MulitQC v1.6(Ewels et al., 2016)https://multiqc.info/
Bowtie2 v2.3.4.3(Langmead and Salzberg, 2012)http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/
Samtools v1.9(Li et al., 2009)RRID: SCR_002105 http://www.htslib.org/
sambamba v0.6.7(Tarasov et al., 2015)https://lomereiter.github.io/sambamba/
bedtools v2.25.0(Quinlan and Hall, 2010)RRID: SCR_006646 https://bedtools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
deepTools v3.1.2(Ramirez et al., 2014)RRID: SCR_016366 https://deeptools.readthedocs.io/en/develop/
featureCounts v1.6.2(Liao et al., 2014)RRID: SCR_012919 http://bioinf.wehi.edu.au/featureCounts/
DESeq2 v1.26.0(Love et al., 2014)RRID: SCR_015687 https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html
MACS2 v2.1.2(Zhang et al., 2008)https://github.com/taoliu/MACS
DiffBind v2.14.0(Ross-Innes et al., 2012)RRID: SCR_012918 https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DiffBind.html
ChIPseeker v1.22.0(Yu et al., 2015)https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/ChIPseeker.html
HOMER v4.10(Heinz et al., 2010)RRID: SCR_010881http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/
Intervene v0.6.1(Khan and Mathelier, 2017)https://intervene.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
Integrative Genomics Viewer(Robinson et al., 2011)RRID: SCR_011793 http://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/

Other

Eppendorf realplex2EppendorfCat#A248709R
The BD FACSAria IIBDN/A
Percival chamberPercivalN/A

Lysis buffer

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
Tris-HCl pH 7.5 (1 M)15 mM0.75 mL
NaCl (5 M)20 mM0.2 mL
KCl (2.5 M)80 mM1.6 mL
2-Mercaptoethanol (14.3 M)5 mM17.5 μL
Spermine (1 M)0.5 mM25 μL
Cocktail (100×)0.5 mL
Triton X-100 (100%)0.2%0.1 mL
ddH2O47.3 mL
Totaln/a50 mL

Wash buffer

ReagentFinal concentrationAmount
Tris-HCl pH 8.0 (1 M)10 mM0.5 mL
MgCl2 (1 M)5 mM0.25 mL
Cocktail (100×)0.5 mL
ddH2O49.25 mL
Totaln/a50 mL
ReagentAmount
5× TTBL10 μL
TTE Mix V505 μL
Cocktail (100×)0.5 μL
Nuclei suspensionx μL
ddH2O34.5–x μL
Total50 μL
ReagentAmount
Transposed DNA10 μL
N5 Primer2.5 μL
N7 Primer2.5 μL
2× NEBNext high-fidelity PCR mix25 μL
ddH2O10 μL
Total50 μL
PCR cycling conditions
StepsTemperatureTimeCycles
Pre-incubation72°C5 min1
Initial denaturation98°C30 s1
Denaturation98°C10 s5 cycles
Annealing63°C30 s
Extension72°C1 min
Hold4°CForever
ReagentAmount
Amplified library5 μL
N5 Primer0.5 μL
N7 Primer0.5 μL
2× NEBNext high-fidelity PCR mix7.5 μL
20× Eva green dye0.75 μL
ddH2O0.75 μL
Total15 μL
PCR cycling conditions
StepsTemperatureTimeCycles
Initial denaturation98°C30 s1
Denaturation98°C10 s20 cycles
Annealing63°C30 s
Extension72°C1 min
PCR cycling conditions
StepsTemperatureTimeCycles
Initial denaturation98°C30 s1
Denaturation98°C10 sN cycles
Annealing63°C30 s
Extension72°C1 min
Hold4°CForever
  17 in total

1.  featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features.

Authors:  Yang Liao; Gordon K Smyth; Wei Shi
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Chromatin Accessibility Dynamics and a Hierarchical Transcriptional Regulatory Network Structure for Plant Somatic Embryogenesis.

Authors:  Fu-Xiang Wang; Guan-Dong Shang; Lian-Yu Wu; Zhou-Geng Xu; Xin-Yan Zhao; Jia-Wei Wang
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 12.270

3.  Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities.

Authors:  Sven Heinz; Christopher Benner; Nathanael Spann; Eric Bertolino; Yin C Lin; Peter Laslo; Jason X Cheng; Cornelis Murre; Harinder Singh; Christopher K Glass
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools.

Authors:  Heng Li; Bob Handsaker; Alec Wysoker; Tim Fennell; Jue Ruan; Nils Homer; Gabor Marth; Goncalo Abecasis; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Integrative genomics viewer.

Authors:  James T Robinson; Helga Thorvaldsdóttir; Wendy Winckler; Mitchell Guttman; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Caryn S Ross-Innes; Rory Stark; Andrew E Teschendorff; Kelly A Holmes; H Raza Ali; Mark J Dunning; Gordon D Brown; Ondrej Gojis; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Simak Ali; Suet-Feung Chin; Carlo Palmieri; Carlos Caldas; Jason S Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data.

Authors:  Fidel Ramírez; Friederike Dündar; Sarah Diehl; Björn A Grüning; Thomas Manke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Anders
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor.

Authors:  Shifu Chen; Yanqing Zhou; Yaru Chen; Jia Gu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Intervene: a tool for intersection and visualization of multiple gene or genomic region sets.

Authors:  Aziz Khan; Anthony Mathelier
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.