Caiyu Zhuang1,2, Julien Poublanc1, Larissa Mcketton1, Lakshmikumar Venkatraghavan3, Olivia Sobczyk1, James Duffin3,4, Adrian P Crawley1, Joseph A Fisher3,4, Renhua Wu5, David J Mikulis1. 1. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Medical Imaging, the First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College of Shantou University, Shantou, China. 3. Department of Anaesthesia, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Physiology, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. 5. Department of Medical Imaging, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Medical College of Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) obtained from arterial spin labeling (ASL) using different post labeling delays (PLD). METHODS: Forty-two patients with steno-occlusive diseases and impaired CVR were divided into two groups, one scanned with a 1.5-second (1.5-s) and the other with a 2.5-second (2.5-s) PLD ASL protocol. For all patients, a region of interest (ROI) was drawn around the CVR impairment. This affected ROI was then left-right flipped across the brain midline to obtain the control ROI. For both groups, the difference in grey matter CVR between affected and control ROI was first tested to confirm significance. The average grey matter CBF of affected and control ROIs were then compared. The same analysis method was used to compare affected and control hemispheres. RESULTS: In both groups of 1.5-s and 2.5-s PLD, CVR values in the affected ROI (-0.049±0.055 and -0.042±0.074%/mmHg, respectively) were significantly lower compared to that in the control ROI (0.152±0.054 and 0.152±0.053%/mmHg, respectively, P<0.0001). In the group with the 1.5-s PLD, CBF in the affected ROI (37.62±11.37 mL/100 g/min) was significantly lower compared to CBF in the control ROI (44.13±11.58 mL/100 g/min, P<0.05). However, in the group with the 2.5-s PLD, no significant differences could be seen between CBF in the affected ROI (40.50±14.82 mL/100 g/min) and CBF in the control ROI (39.68±12.49 mL/100 g/min, P=0.73). In the hemisphere-based analysis, CBF was significantly lower in the affected side than in the control side for the group with the 1.5-s PLD (P<0.05) when CVR was impaired (P<0.0001), but not for the group with the 2.5-s PLD (P=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study reveals and highlights the value of a shorter-PLD ASL protocol, which is able to reflect CVR impairment. At the same time, we offer a better understanding of the relationship between BOLD CVR and CBF obtained from ASL. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) obtained from arterial spin labeling (ASL) using different post labeling delays (PLD). METHODS: Forty-two patients with steno-occlusive diseases and impaired CVR were divided into two groups, one scanned with a 1.5-second (1.5-s) and the other with a 2.5-second (2.5-s) PLD ASL protocol. For all patients, a region of interest (ROI) was drawn around the CVR impairment. This affected ROI was then left-right flipped across the brain midline to obtain the control ROI. For both groups, the difference in grey matter CVR between affected and control ROI was first tested to confirm significance. The average grey matter CBF of affected and control ROIs were then compared. The same analysis method was used to compare affected and control hemispheres. RESULTS: In both groups of 1.5-s and 2.5-s PLD, CVR values in the affected ROI (-0.049±0.055 and -0.042±0.074%/mmHg, respectively) were significantly lower compared to that in the control ROI (0.152±0.054 and 0.152±0.053%/mmHg, respectively, P<0.0001). In the group with the 1.5-s PLD, CBF in the affected ROI (37.62±11.37 mL/100 g/min) was significantly lower compared to CBF in the control ROI (44.13±11.58 mL/100 g/min, P<0.05). However, in the group with the 2.5-s PLD, no significant differences could be seen between CBF in the affected ROI (40.50±14.82 mL/100 g/min) and CBF in the control ROI (39.68±12.49 mL/100 g/min, P=0.73). In the hemisphere-based analysis, CBF was significantly lower in the affected side than in the control side for the group with the 1.5-s PLD (P<0.05) when CVR was impaired (P<0.0001), but not for the group with the 2.5-s PLD (P=0.49). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study reveals and highlights the value of a shorter-PLD ASL protocol, which is able to reflect CVR impairment. At the same time, we offer a better understanding of the relationship between BOLD CVR and CBF obtained from ASL. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Kevin Sam; Elizabeth Small; Julien Poublanc; Jay S Han; Daniel M Mandell; Joseph A Fisher; Adrian P Crawley; David John Mikulis Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Colin P Derdeyn; Tom O Videen; Kent D Yundt; Susanne M Fritsch; David A Carpenter; Robert L Grubb; William J Powers Journal: Brain Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: J Fierstra; O Sobczyk; A Battisti-Charbonney; D M Mandell; J Poublanc; A P Crawley; D J Mikulis; J Duffin; J A Fisher Journal: J Physiol Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Donghoon Kim; Timothy M Hughes; Megan E Lipford; Suzanne Craft; Laura D Baker; Samuel N Lockhart; Christopher T Whitlow; Stephanie E Okonmah-Obazee; Christina E Hugenschmidt; Matthew Bobinski; Youngkyoo Jung Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 4.755