Literature DB >> 33531901

A Comparison between Two Different Remineralizing Agents against White Spot Lesions: An In Vitro Study.

Hassan Alsubhi1, Mohammad Gabbani1, Abdulsalam Alsolami1, Mohammed Alosaimi1, Jameel Abuljadayel2, Waleed Taju2, Omair Bukhari2.   

Abstract

Enamel demineralization and white-spot lesions (WSLs) around the orthodontic brackets are common clinical complications after orthodontic fixed appliance therapy. WSLs form mainly due to plaque deposition around the brackets during the orthodontic treatment period. This study was designed to compare and evaluate the efficacy of two different remineralization agents on WSLs, which are "Clinpro 5000 and Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief". 27 caries-free human premolar teeth were collected after extraction for orthodontic purposes. The crowns were set in acrylic resin, and the entire surfaces were coated with nail varnish apart from an area of 4 × 4 mm on the buccal surface. The surface microhardness (SMH) was measured using the Vickers microhardness testing machine at baseline, after demineralization, and after treatment. Then, the different SMH values were statistically analyzed using mixed-effects linear regression. All samples were immersed in demineralizing solution for ten days to create WSLs, and then the teeth were allocated randomly into one of the three groups: Group 1 (control group-immersed in artificial saliva), Group 2 (treated with Colgate sensitive Pro-Relief toothpaste), and Group 3 (Clinpro 5000 toothpaste). Cycles of treatment were done for 5 minutes every 12 hours for 14 days. The samples were stored in freshly prepared artificial saliva between cycles. The mixed-effects model was used to quantify the effect of different remineralization agents. All statistics were computed using STATA software (version14.1; Stata, College Station, TX). All statistical tests were two-tailed and interpreted at the 0.05 significance level. Both agents improved the surface hardness. Clinpro 5000 improved the surface hardness by 12.7 (P value 0.012), and Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief improved surface hardness by 18.2 (P value <0.0001), However when both treatments are compared with each other, there was no statistical significance among them. When compared to the control group, both treatments "Clinpro™ 5000 and Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief" have significantly improved enamel's SMH.
Copyright © 2021 Hassan Alsubhi et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33531901      PMCID: PMC7837783          DOI: 10.1155/2021/6644069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dent        ISSN: 1687-8728


  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of 3 commercially available materials for resolution of white spot lesions.

Authors:  Richard W Ballard; Joseph L Hagan; Alexis N Phaup; Nikhil Sarkar; Janice A Townsend; Paul C Armbruster
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization. Part 1. Lesion development.

Authors:  B Ogaard; G Rølla; J Arends
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives.

Authors:  B U Zachrisson; B O Brobakken
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1978-07

4.  Dental caries: a dynamic disease process.

Authors:  J D B Featherstone
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.291

5.  Comparing the efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride to a commercial sensitive toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion: an eight-week clinical study on Canadian adults.

Authors:  Farid Ayad; Nuhad Ayad; Yun Po Zhang; William DeVizio; Diane Cummins; Luis R Mateo
Journal:  J Clin Dent       Date:  2009

6.  Comparing the efficacy in reducing dentin hypersensitivity of a new toothpaste containing 8.0% arginine, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluoride to a commercial sensitive toothpaste containing 2% potassium ion: an eight-week clinical study in Rome, Italy.

Authors:  Raffaella Docimo; Luigi Montesani; Paulo Maturo; Micaela Costacurta; Michela Bartolino; William DeVizio; Yun Po Zhang; Diane Cummins; Serge Dibart; Luis R Mateo
Journal:  J Clin Dent       Date:  2009

7.  Prevalence of white spot lesion formation during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Katie C Julien; Peter H Buschang; Phillip M Campbell
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Factors affecting dental biofilm in patients wearing fixed orthodontic appliances.

Authors:  Li Mei; Joyce Chieng; Connie Wong; Gareth Benic; Mauro Farella
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Remineralization potential of fluoride, amorphous calcium phosphate-casein phosphopeptide, and combination of hydroxylapatite and fluoride on enamel lesions: An in vitro comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Siddhesh Bandekar; Suvarna Patil; Divya Dudulwar; Prashant Prakash Moogi; Surabhi Ghosh; Shirin Kshirsagar
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2019 May-Jun

Review 10.  Demineralization-remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone.

Authors:  Ensanya Ali Abou Neel; Anas Aljabo; Adam Strange; Salwa Ibrahim; Melanie Coathup; Anne M Young; Laurent Bozec; Vivek Mudera
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.