Literature DB >> 33531628

On the effect of antiresorptive drugs on the bone remodeling of the mandible after dental implantation: a mathematical model.

Mehran Ashrafi1, Farzan Ghalichi1, Behnam Mirzakouchaki2, Manuel Doblare3.   

Abstract

Bone remodeling identifies the process of permanent bone change with new bone formation and old bone resorption. Understanding this process is essential in many applications, such as optimizing the treatment of diseases like osteoporosis, maintaining bone density in long-term periods of disuse, or assessing the long-term evolution of the bone surrounding prostheses after implantation. A particular case of study is the bone remodeling process after dental implantation. Despite the overall success of this type of implants, the increasing life expectancy in developed countries has boosted the demand for dental implants in patients with osteoporosis. Although several studies demonstrate a high success rate of dental implants in osteoporotic patients, it is also known that the healing time and the failure rate increase, necessitating the adoption of pharmacological measures to improve bone quality in those patients. However, the general efficacy of these antiresorptive drugs for osteoporotic patients is still controversial, requiring more experimental and clinical studies. In this work, we investigate the effect of different doses of several drugs, used nowadays in osteoporotic patients, on the evolution of bone density after dental implantation. With this aim, we use a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) mathematical model that includes the effect of antiresorptive drugs on the RANK/RANK-L/OPG pathway, as well as the mechano-chemical coupling with external mechanical loads. This mechano-PK/PD model is then used to analyze the evolution of bone in normal and osteoporotic mandibles after dental implantation with different drug dosages. We show that using antiresorptive agents such as bisphosphonates or denosumab increases bone density and the associated mechanical properties, but at the same time, it also increases bone brittleness. We conclude that, despite the many limitations of these very complex models, the one presented here is capable of predicting qualitatively the evolution of some of the main biological and chemical variables associated with the process of bone remodeling in patients receiving drugs for osteoporosis, so it could be used to optimize dental implant design and coating for osteoporotic patients, as well as the drug dosage protocol for patient-specific treatments.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33531628     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82502-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  54 in total

1.  Integrated model for denosumab and ibandronate pharmacodynamics in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Dhananjay D Marathe; Anshu Marathe; Donald E Mager
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.627

2.  Histomorphometric evaluation of titanium implants in osteoporotic rabbits.

Authors:  G G Lugero; V de Falco Caparbo; M L Guzzo; B König; V Jorgetti
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 3.  The relevance of biomaterials to the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  D Arcos; A R Boccaccini; M Bohner; A Díez-Pérez; M Epple; E Gómez-Barrena; A Herrera; J A Planell; L Rodríguez-Mañas; M Vallet-Regí
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Influence of Skeletal and Local Bone Density on Dental Implant Stability in Patients with Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Joe Merheb; Andy Temmerman; Lars Rasmusson; Alexander Kübler; Andreas Thor; Marc Quirynen
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.932

Review 5.  Dental implants in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  F C F L de Medeiros; G A H Kudo; B G Leme; P P Saraiva; F R Verri; H M Honório; E P Pellizzer; J F Santiago Junior
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.789

6.  Impact of local and systemic factors on the incidence of oral implant failures, up to abutment connection.

Authors:  Ghada Alsaadi; Marc Quirynen; Arnost Komárek; Daniel van Steenberghe
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 7.  Review of dental implant rat research models simulating osteoporosis or diabetes.

Authors:  Barbara Glösel; Ulrike Kuchler; Georg Watzek; Reinhard Gruber
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Skeletal calcium homeostasis and countermeasures to prevent disuse osteoporosis.

Authors:  V S Schneider; J McDonald
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Cellular mechanisms of bone remodeling.

Authors:  Erik Fink Eriksen
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.514

10.  The role of osteocytes in targeted bone remodeling: a mathematical model.

Authors:  Jason M Graham; Bruce P Ayati; Sarah A Holstein; James A Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Antiresorptive therapy and dental implant survival: an up to 20-year retrospective cohort study in women.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Cheng; Rolf Ewers; Katherine Morgan; Muneki Hirayama; Laura Murcko; John Morgan; Edmara T P Bergamo; Estevam A Bonfante
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 2.  New Generation of Meso and Antiprogestins (SPRMs) into the Osteoporosis Approach.

Authors:  Magdalena Woźniczka; Katarzyna Błaszczak-Świątkiewicz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Finite element analysis of intraosseous distal radioulnar joint prosthesis.

Authors:  Farzaneh Gholamian; Mehran Ashrafi; Ali Moradi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Mechanistic PK-PD model of alendronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis predicts bone site-specific response.

Authors:  José L Calvo-Gallego; Peter Pivonka; Rocío Ruiz-Lozano; Javier Martínez-Reina
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-17

Review 5.  Current Status of the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Agustín Aibar-Almazán; Ana Voltes-Martínez; Yolanda Castellote-Caballero; Diego Fernando Afanador-Restrepo; María Del Carmen Carcelén-Fraile; Elena López-Ruiz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 6.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.