Literature DB >> 33531598

Intraoperative perfusion assessment of the proximal colon by a visual grading system for safe anastomosis after resection in left-sided colorectal cancer patients.

Hyo Seon Ryu1, Seok-Byung Lim2, Eu-Tteum Choi3, Inho Song1, Jong Lyul Lee1, Chan Wook Kim1, Yong Sik Yoon1, In Ja Park1, Chang Sik Yu1, Jin Cheon Kim1.   

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of a new visual grading system. We included 50 patients who underwent resection of primary colorectal cancer. Before anastomosis, the marginal vessel was cut and the perfusion status was assessed by a visual grading system. The visual grading system is comprised of five grades according to the bleeding from the marginal vessel and is categorized into 4 groups: good (grade A and B), moderate (grade C), poor (grade D) and none (grade E). Colorectal anastomosis was performed only in the good and moderate groups. We compared postoperative outcomes between the good and moderate groups and analysed the factors affecting the perfusion grade. Among the patients, 48% were grade A, 12% were grade B, and 40% were grade C. There was no anastomotic leakage. Only one patient with grade C showed ischemic colitis and needed reoperation. Age was the only factor correlated with perfusion grade in multivariate analysis (OR 1.080, 95% CI 1.006-1.159, p = 0.034). The perfusion grades were significantly different between > 65 and < 65 year-old patients (> 65, A 29.2% B 12.5% C 58.3% vs. < 65, A 65.4% B 11.5% C 23.1%, p = 0.006). Our intraoperative perfusion assessment that uses a cutting method and a visual grading system is simple and useful for performing a safe anastomosis after colorectal resection. If the perfusion grade is better than grade C, an anastomosis can be performed safely. Age was found to be an important factor affecting the perfusion grade.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33531598     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82486-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  20 in total

1.  Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients.

Authors:  Mark A Boccola; Petra G Buettner; Warren M Rozen; Simon K Siu; Andrew R L Stevenson; Russell Stitz; Yik-Hong Ho
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Tissue oxygen saturation during colorectal surgery measured by near-infrared spectroscopy: pilot study to predict anastomotic complications.

Authors:  Yasumitsu Hirano; Kenji Omura; Yasuhiko Tatsuzawa; Junzo Shimizu; Yukimitsu Kawaura; Go Watanabe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with double stapling technique anastomosis.

Authors:  Kenji Kawada; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak.

Authors:  A Vignali; L Gianotti; M Braga; G Radaelli; L Malvezzi; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Laser Doppler assessment of the influence of division at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic blood flow in rectosigmoid cancer surgery.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Seike; Keiji Koda; Norio Saito; Kenji Oda; Chihiro Kosugi; Kimio Shimizu; Masaru Miyazaki
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Left-sided colon and colorectal anastomoses: Doppler ultrasound as an aid to assess bowel vascularization. A prospective evaluation of 200 consecutive elective cases.

Authors:  P Ambrosetti; J Robert; P Mathey; A Rohner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The influence of anastomotic leakage for rectal cancer oncologic outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianguo Yang; Qingwei Chen; Li Jindou; Yong Cheng
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery: a predictor of significant morbidity and hospital mortality, and diminished tumour-free survival.

Authors:  R Kube; P Mroczkowski; D Granowski; F Benedix; M Sahm; U Schmidt; I Gastinger; H Lippert
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  The types of anastomotic leakage that develop following anterior resection for rectal cancer demonstrate distinct characteristics and oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Chan Wook Kim; Yong Sik Yoon; In Ja Park; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Bodil Gessler; Olle Eriksson; Eva Angenete
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  2 in total

1.  Mesenteric Vascular Evaluation with Pre-operative Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography and Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Reduce Anastomotic Leaks after Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Tsanko Yotsov; Martin Karamanliev; Svilen Maslyankov; Sergey Iliev; Nikolai Ramadanov; Dobromir Dimitrov
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

2.  All-cause 30- and 90-day inpatient readmission costs associated with 4 minimally invasive colon surgery approaches: A propensity-matched analysis using Medicare and commercial claims data.

Authors:  Michelle P Sosa; Deirdre G McNicholas; Arbelina B Bebla; Keith A Needham; Paul M Starker
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-09-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.