Adam Joules1, Julianne Connors2, Rachel Johnson1, Elizabeth A Van Orsow3, David H McKenna4, Sarah Nikiforow5, Jerome Ritz5, Adrian Gee6, Allison Hubel7. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 4. Cell Therapy Clinical Laboratory, M Health Fairview, Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA. 5. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA. 7. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Electronic address: hubel001@umn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIMS: Cell therapies are an emerging treatment option for a variety of diseases, especially with the success of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. With 18 FDA-approved cell therapy products as of December 2020 and a growing number in clinical trials, standards for most aspects of the cell therapy lifecycle are well-established by professional organizations like AABB and FACT; however, there are limited standardized protocols regarding the day-of infusion. METHODS: Infusions were observed at three academic medical centers in the United States, and the workflows were analyzed and compared based on factors including facility layout, product verification processes, cryobag design, timing restrictions, and use of electronic medical records. RESULTS: Variations between the facilities were identified with product thawing location and cell therapy lab location being the most important factors in time from thaw to infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, opportunities were identified for standardization and streamlining the infusion workflow which may help facilitate adoption of new and existing cell therapies at a wider range of hospitals.
BACKGROUND AIMS: Cell therapies are an emerging treatment option for a variety of diseases, especially with the success of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. With 18 FDA-approved cell therapy products as of December 2020 and a growing number in clinical trials, standards for most aspects of the cell therapy lifecycle are well-established by professional organizations like AABB and FACT; however, there are limited standardized protocols regarding the day-of infusion. METHODS: Infusions were observed at three academic medical centers in the United States, and the workflows were analyzed and compared based on factors including facility layout, product verification processes, cryobag design, timing restrictions, and use of electronic medical records. RESULTS: Variations between the facilities were identified with product thawing location and cell therapy lab location being the most important factors in time from thaw to infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, opportunities were identified for standardization and streamlining the infusion workflow which may help facilitate adoption of new and existing cell therapies at a wider range of hospitals.
Authors: Michael A Matthay; B Taylor Thompson; Elizabeth J Read; David H McKenna; Kathleen D Liu; Carolyn S Calfee; Jae Woo Lee Journal: Chest Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Gregory A Nuttall; John P Abenstein; James R Stubbs; Paula Santrach; Mark H Ereth; Pamela M Johnson; Emily Douglas; William C Oliver Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 7.616