Hong-Zhuo Chen1,2, Wan-Sheng Liang3, Wu-Feng Yao1, Tian-Xi Liu4. 1. Hemodialysis Center of the First Hospital of Lanzhou University. 2. School of Nursing, Lanzhou University. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 4. Department of Nephrology, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular complications at the puncture site is a common complication after femoral artery puncture. It will not only affect the postoperative effect and patient comfort, but also may endanger the life of the patient. The effective compression hemostasis methods at the puncture site can improve the comfort of the patient, shorten the hospital stay, and reduce the burden on the medical staff. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different compression methods after femoral artery puncture. METHODS: We will include all relevant randomized controlled trials by searching major Chinese and English databases and clinical trial registration platforms. Use Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of bias tool for bias risk analysis. Use the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the quality of evidence. Data analysis will be performed using Stata (V.15.0) and WinBUGS (V.1.4.3). RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-seven records were obtained by searching the database but no records were obtained by other means. After removing duplicate records, 377 records remain. We excluded 103 records through abstract and title, leaving 274 full-text articles. CONCLUSION: This study will compare the application effects of different compression methods after femoral artery puncture. We hope that this study will help guide clinical decision-making and provide evidence for the management of patients after femoral artery puncture. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY2020120094.
BACKGROUND: Vascular complications at the puncture site is a common complication after femoral artery puncture. It will not only affect the postoperative effect and patient comfort, but also may endanger the life of the patient. The effective compression hemostasis methods at the puncture site can improve the comfort of the patient, shorten the hospital stay, and reduce the burden on the medical staff. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different compression methods after femoral artery puncture. METHODS: We will include all relevant randomized controlled trials by searching major Chinese and English databases and clinical trial registration platforms. Use Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of bias tool for bias risk analysis. Use the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation to assess the quality of evidence. Data analysis will be performed using Stata (V.15.0) and WinBUGS (V.1.4.3). RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-seven records were obtained by searching the database but no records were obtained by other means. After removing duplicate records, 377 records remain. We excluded 103 records through abstract and title, leaving 274 full-text articles. CONCLUSION: This study will compare the application effects of different compression methods after femoral artery puncture. We hope that this study will help guide clinical decision-making and provide evidence for the management of patients after femoral artery puncture. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY2020120094.
Authors: Niels R Holm; Birthe Sindberg; Mia Schou; Michael Maeng; Anne Kaltoft; Morten Bøttcher; Lars R Krusell; Jakob Hjort; Leif Thuesen; Christian J Terkelsen; Evald H Christiansen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Steen D Kristensen; Jens F Lassen Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Milo A Puhan; Holger J Schünemann; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Tianjing Li; Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Jasvinder A Singh; Alfons G Kessels; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: BMJ Date: 2014-09-24
Authors: N A Omoigui; R M Califf; K Pieper; G Keeler; M A O'Hanesian; L G Berdan; D B Mark; J D Talley; E J Topol Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1995-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Brendan J Doyle; Henry H Ting; Malcolm R Bell; Ryan J Lennon; Verghese Mathew; Mandeep Singh; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 11.195