Literature DB >> 33529387

A field study using different technologies to detect calving at a large-scale hungarian dairy farm.

András Horváth1,2, Lea Lénárt1,2, Anna Csepreghy1, Márta Madar1, Mátyás Pálffy2, Ottó Szenci1,2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate three different calving detection systems in order to assess and compare their efficiency. The study was conducted at a large-scale dairy farm involving 54 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows and heifers. Animals were fitted with multiple devices: a rumination measuring device (Ruminact® (RA)), an intravaginal thermometer (Vel'Phone® (VP)) and a tail movement sensor (Moocall® (MC)) 5 to 7 days before expected calving and were removed after parturition. RA detects rumination time (RT) and calculates it in 2-hr intervals. VP detects a decrease in vaginal temperature that might indicate calving within 48 hr and the drop in temperature resulting from the expulsion of the device at calving (EXP message). MC detected increased tail movements and if they persisted for one hour, 1HA message was sent. If they continued during the subsequent hour, then 2HA message was sent. Messages sent by MC within 4 hr before calving (C4) were selected retrospectively as true positives for the prediction of calving, using the significant changes in RT as a baseline. All other messages were categorized as false positive. The mean value of RT decreased in a non-significant manner between interval -22 and -4 before calving. Significant decrease of RT was detectable between the two intervals of -4 and -2 before calving (24.7 ± 18.6 min/2 hr and 14.0 ± 13.0 min/2 hr, respectively). There was no significant difference between RT of primiparous and multiparous animals. EXP messages were accurate (positive predictive value 100%) indicators of the onset of calving. We received on average 12.7 ± 15.2 messages/animal (11.0 ± 10.1 and 16.6 ± 22.2 for cows and heifers, respectively). Positive predictive value was 12.6%. The number of false-positive messages was significantly higher in heifers. All three automatic systems could be used in a large-scale farm environment.
© 2021 The Authors. Reproduction in Domestic Animals published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calving prediction; dairy cattle; intravaginal temperature; rumination; tail movement

Year:  2021        PMID: 33529387     DOI: 10.1111/rda.13904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim        ISSN: 0936-6768            Impact factor:   2.005


  5 in total

1.  Assessment of Sensitivity and Profitability of an Intravaginal Sensor for Remote Calving Prediction in Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Martina Crociati; Lakamy Sylla; Giuseppe Stradaioli; Maurizio Monaci; Alfonso Zecconi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 2.  How to Predict Parturition in Cattle? A Literature Review of Automatic Devices and Technologies for Remote Monitoring and Calving Prediction.

Authors:  Martina Crociati; Lakamy Sylla; Arianna De Vincenzi; Giuseppe Stradaioli; Maurizio Monaci
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Identification of cow-level risk factors and associations of selected blood macro-minerals at parturition with dystocia and stillbirth in Holstein dairy cows.

Authors:  M Bahrami-Yekdangi; G R Ghorbani; A Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi; A Mahnani; J K Drackley; M H Ghaffari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Accuracy to Predict the Onset of Calving in Dairy Farms by Using Different Precision Livestock Farming Devices.

Authors:  Ottó Szenci
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Sensor and Video: Two Complementary Approaches for Evaluation of Dairy Cow Behavior after Calving Sensor Attachment.

Authors:  Johanna Pfeiffer; Olivia Spykman; Markus Gandorfer
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.