Literature DB >> 33529197

A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing.

Emma Graham-Clarke1, Alison Rushton2,3, John Marriott1.   

Abstract

Non-medical prescribing was introduced into the United Kingdom to improve patient care, but early research indicated a third of Allied Health Professionals may not use their prescribing qualification. A previous literature review, highlighting factors influencing prescribing, identified only papers with nursing and pharmacy participants. This investigation explored consensus on factors affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribers. A three round Delphi study was conducted with pharmacist and physiotherapist prescribers. Round One comprised information gathering on facilitators and barriers to prescribing participants had experienced, and underwent content analysis. This was followed by two sequential consensus seeking rounds with participants asked to rate the importance of statements to themselves. Consensus criteria were determined a priori, including median, interquartile range, percentage agreement and Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W). Statements reaching consensus were ranked for importance in Round Three and analysed to produce top ten ranks for all participants and for each professional group. Participants, recruited October 2018, comprised 24 pharmacists and 18 physiotherapists. In Round One, content analysis of 172 statements regarding prescribing influences revealed 24 themes. 127 statements were included in Round Two for importance rating (barriers = 68, facilitators = 59). After Round Two, 29 statements reached consensus (barriers = 1, facilitators = 28), with no further statements reaching consensus following Round Three. The highest ranked statement in Round Three overall was: "Being able to prescribe to patients is more effective and really useful working [in my area]". Medical support and improved patient care factors appeared the most important. Differences were noted between physiotherapist and pharmacist prescribers regarding the top ten ranked statements, for example team working which pharmacists ranked higher than physiotherapists. Differences may be explained by the variety of practice areas and relative newness of physiotherapy prescribing. Barriers appear to be post or person specific, whereas facilitators appear universal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33529197      PMCID: PMC7853445          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  23 in total

Review 1.  Consensus methods in prescribing research.

Authors:  S M Campbell; J A Cantrill
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 2.  Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients.

Authors:  E McColl; A Jacoby; L Thomas; J Soutter; C Bamford; N Steen; R Thomas; E Harvey; A Garratt; J Bond
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 3.  Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research.

Authors:  Sinead Keeney; Felicity Hasson; Hugh McKenna
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Methodological and conceptual issues confronting a cross-country Delphi study of educational program evaluation.

Authors:  Hsin-Ling Hung; James W Altschuld; Yi-Fang Lee
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2008-03-04

Review 5.  Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development.

Authors:  M K Murphy; N A Black; D L Lamping; C M McKee; C F Sanderson; J Askham; T Marteau
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Research methods for clinical therapists: applied project design and analysis Carolyn M Hicks Research methods for clinical therapists: applied project design and analysis Churchill LIvingstone 352 Fifth edition £22.99 9780043074301 [Formula: see text].

Authors: 
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2010-10-22

Review 7.  Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Mojtaba Vaismoradi; Hannele Turunen; Terese Bondas
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 1.857

Review 8.  Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.

Authors:  Lawrence A Palinkas; Sarah M Horwitz; Carla A Green; Jennifer P Wisdom; Naihua Duan; Kimberly Hoagwood
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2015-09

9.  Non-medical prescribing in the United Kingdom National Health Service: A systematic policy review.

Authors:  Emma Graham-Clarke; Alison Rushton; Timothy Noblet; John Marriott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Holey; Jennifer L Feeley; John Dixon; Vicki J Whittaker
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  A decade of independent prescribing in the UK: a review of progress.

Authors:  Matthew Tj Fitzpatrick; Alan M Borthwick
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Exploring the barriers and facilitators to non-medical prescribing experienced by pharmacists and physiotherapists, using focus groups.

Authors:  Emma Graham-Clarke; Alison Rushton; John Marriott
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.