Literature DB >> 33528878

Trust, medical expertise and humaneness: A qualitative study on people with cancer' satisfaction with medical care.

Susanne Blödt1, Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn2, Georg Seifert3,4, Christine Holmberg1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding peoples' evaluations of their health care is important to ensure appropriate health-care services.
OBJECTIVES: To understand what factors influence peoples' satisfaction with care and how interpersonal trust is established between doctors and cancer patients in Germany.
DESIGN: A narrative interview study that included women with a diagnosis of breast cancer and men with a diagnosis of prostate cancer. A question-focused analysis was conducted. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Interviewees were sought across Germany through self-help organizations, clinics, rehabilitation facilities, physicians and other health-care professionals, in order to develop modules on experiencing cancer for the website krankheitserfahrungen.de (illness experiences.de).
RESULTS: Satisfaction was related to the perception of having a knowledgeable and trusted physician. Trust was developed through particular interactions in which 'medical expertise' and 'humaneness' were enacted by physicians. Humaneness represents the ability of physicians to personalize medical expertise and thereby to convey working in the individual's best interest and to treat the patient as an individual and unique human being. This was fostered through contextual and relational factors including among others setting, time, information transfer, respect, availability, profoundness, sensitivity and understanding.
CONCLUSION: It was the ability to make oneself known to and know the patient in particular ways that allowed for satisfying care experiences by establishing interpersonal trust. This suggests the importance of conceptualizing the doctor-patient relationship as a fundamentally reciprocal human interaction of caregiving and care-receiving. At the core of the satisfying care experiences lies a doctor-patient relationship with a profoundly humane quality.
© 2020 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; good care; patient narratives; prostate cancer; qualitative research

Year:  2021        PMID: 33528878     DOI: 10.1111/hex.13171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  5 in total

1.  Emotional and physical experiences of people with neovascular age-related macular degeneration during the injection process in Germany: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne Thier; Martina Breuning; Christian Wolfram; Oliver Zeitz; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  The role of trust in health-seeking for non-communicable disease services in fragile contexts: A cross-country comparative study.

Authors:  Stella Arakelyan; Kanykey Jailobaeva; Arek Dakessian; Karin Diaconu; Lizzie Caperon; Alison Strang; Ibrahim R Bou-Orm; Sophie Witter; Alastair Ager
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Restricted family presence for hospitalized surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: How hospital care providers and families navigated ethical tensions and experiences of institutional betrayal.

Authors:  Lesley Gotlib Conn; Natalie G Coburn; Lisa Di Prospero; Julie Hallet; Laurie Legere; Tracy MacCharles; Jessica Slutsker; Ru Tagger; Frances C Wright; Barbara Haas
Journal:  SSM Qual Res Health       Date:  2022-08-02

4.  Nonlinear Associations between Medical Expenditure, Perceived Medical Attitude, and Sociodemographics, and Older Adults' Self-Rated Health in China: Applying the Extreme Gradient Boosting Model.

Authors:  Yuqing Liang; Wanwan Zheng; Woon-Seek Lee
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-26

5.  Trust and shared decision-making among individuals with multiple myeloma: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Robin L Whitney; Anne Elizabeth Clark White; Aaron S Rosenberg; Richard L Kravitz; Katherine K Kim
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.