Literature DB >> 33528648

Accommodation and binocular vision changes after wearing orthokeratology lens in 8- to 14-year-old myopic children.

Yutong Song1, Shenlin Zhu1, Bi Yang1, Xue Wang1, Wei Ma1, Guangjing Dong1, Longqian Liu2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study aimed to observe and analyze the dynamic accommodation and binocular vision changes in myopic children after they switched from spectacles to orthokeratology (ortho-k) lenses.
METHODS: Thirty-six myopic children aged 8-14 years were enrolled in this prospective, self-controlled study from West China Hospital. General information was gathered, and examinations were performed at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after switching to ortho-k lenses. The examination included assessments of distance/near visual acuity, distance/near horizontal and vertical ocular alignment, distance/near horizontal vergence range, accommodative amplitude, monocular/binocular accommodative facility, accommodative response, positive and negative relative accommodation (PRA/NRA), accommodation convergence/accommodation (AC/A), stereopsis, and reading ability.
RESULTS: After the children switched to ortho-k lenses, distance and near ocular alignment showed an exophoric shift (distance: p = 0.001, near: p = 0.002), and the horizontal vergence range decreased by different degrees (convergence: distance blur point (p = 0.002), distance break point (p = 0.005), near blur point (p = 0.011), near break point (p = 0.043); divergence: distance break point (p < 0.001), distance recover point (p < 0.001), near recover point (p = 0.005)). The stereopsis ability (p < 0.001), monocular/binocular accommodative facility (p < 0.001), and PRA (p = 0.010) increased. The accommodative lag (p < 0.001), accommodative amplitude (p < 0.001), and calculated and gradient AC/A (calculated: p = 0.001, gradient: p = 0.025) decreased. The adjusted horizontal and vertical reading times and their ratio decreased (all p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The subjects showed distance and near exophoric shifts after switching to ortho-k lenses; improvements in accommodative function, stereopsis, and ocular motility; and a decrease in the binocular horizontal vergence range. The relationships between these changes and the ortho-k myopic control effects require further investigation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accommodation; Binocular function; Myopia; Ortho-k

Year:  2021        PMID: 33528648     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05106-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  18 in total

1.  Accommodative instability: relationship to progression of early onset myopia.

Authors:  Trine Langaas; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; G Lynn Mitchell; John R Hayes; Lisa A Jones; Melvin L Moeschberger; Susan A Cotter; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; J Daniel Twelker; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Ocular motor triad with single vision contact lenses compared to spectacle lenses.

Authors:  Olivia A Hunt; James S Wolffsohn; Carlos García-Resúa
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 4.  The epidemics of myopia: Aetiology and prevention.

Authors:  Ian G Morgan; Amanda N French; Regan S Ashby; Xinxing Guo; Xiaohu Ding; Mingguang He; Kathryn A Rose
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Binocular and accommodative function in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight® Assessment Study Spain (MASS).

Authors:  Alicia Ruiz-Pomeda; Belén Pérez-Sánchez; Pilar Cañadas; Francisco Luis Prieto-Garrido; Ramón Gutiérrez-Ortega; César Villa-Collar
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Accommodative lag and juvenile-onset myopia progression in children wearing refractive correction.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050.

Authors:  Brien A Holden; Timothy R Fricke; David A Wilson; Monica Jong; Kovin S Naidoo; Padmaja Sankaridurg; Tien Y Wong; Thomas J Naduvilath; Serge Resnikoff
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?

Authors:  Raimundo Jiménez; Loreto Martínez-Almeida; Carlos Salas; Carolina Ortíz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Efficacy Comparison of 16 Interventions for Myopia Control in Children: A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinhai Huang; Daizong Wen; Qinmei Wang; Colm McAlinden; Ian Flitcroft; Haisi Chen; Seang Mei Saw; Hao Chen; Fangjun Bao; Yune Zhao; Liang Hu; Xuexi Li; Rongrong Gao; Weicong Lu; Yaoqiang Du; Zhengxuan Jinag; Ayong Yu; Hengli Lian; Qiuruo Jiang; Ye Yu; Jia Qu
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  The Response AC/A Ratio Before and After the Onset of Myopia.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; G Lynn Mitchell; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Susan A Cotter; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; J Daniel Twelker; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  1 in total

1.  The associations of accommodation and aberrations in myopia control with orthokeratology.

Authors:  Chenglu Ding; Yunyun Chen; Xue Li; Yingying Huang; Hao Chen; Jinhua Bao
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 3.992

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.