Literature DB >> 33528260

Benefits of Iterative Searches of Large Databases to Interpret Large Human Gut Metaproteomic Data Sets.

Ariane Bassignani1,2,3,4, Sandra Plancade4,5, Magali Berland1, Melisande Blein-Nicolas3, Alain Guillot2, Didier Chevret2, Chloé Moritz2, Sylvie Huet4, Salwa Rizkalla6,7, Karine Clément6,7, Joël Doré2, Olivier Langella3, Catherine Juste2.   

Abstract

The gut microbiota are increasingly considered as a main partner of human health. Metaproteomics enables us to move from the functional potential revealed by metagenomics to the functions actually operating in the microbiome. However, metaproteome deciphering remains challenging. In particular, confident interpretation of a myriad of MS/MS spectra can only be pursued with smart database searches. Here, we compare the interpretation of MS/MS data sets from 48 individual human gut microbiomes using three interrogation strategies of the dedicated Integrated nonredundant Gene Catalog (IGC 9.9 million genes from 1267 individual fecal samples) together with the Homo sapiens database: the classical single-step interrogation strategy and two iterative strategies (in either two or three steps) aimed at preselecting a reduced-sized, more targeted search space for the final peptide spectrum matching. Both iterative searches outperformed the single-step classical search in terms of the number of peptides and protein clusters identified and the depth of taxonomic and functional knowledge, and this was the most convincing with the three-step approach. However, iterative searches do not help in reducing variability of repeated analyses, which is inherent to the traditional data-dependent acquisition mode, but this variability did not affect the hierarchical relationship between replicates and all other samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X!Tandem; database search; gut microbiome; metaproteomics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33528260     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  5 in total

1.  An integrated workflow for enhanced taxonomic and functional coverage of the mouse fecal metaproteome.

Authors:  Nicolas Nalpas; Lesley Hoyles; Viktoria Anselm; Tariq Ganief; Laura Martinez-Gili; Cristina Grau; Irina Droste-Borel; Laetitia Davidovic; Xavier Altafaj; Marc-Emmanuel Dumas; Boris Macek
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec

Review 2.  Inferring early-life host and microbiome functions by mass spectrometry-based metaproteomics and metabolomics.

Authors:  Veronika Kuchařová Pettersen; Luis Caetano Martha Antunes; Antoine Dufour; Marie-Claire Arrieta
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.271

3.  Modern Metaproteomics: A Unique Tool to Characterize the Active Microbiome in Health and Diseases, and Pave the Road towards New Biomarkers-Example of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis Flare-Ups.

Authors:  Céline Henry; Ariane Bassignani; Magali Berland; Olivier Langella; Harry Sokol; Catherine Juste
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 7.666

4.  A combined test for feature selection on sparse metaproteomics data-an alternative to missing value imputation.

Authors:  Sandra Plancade; Magali Berland; Mélisande Blein-Nicolas; Olivier Langella; Ariane Bassignani; Catherine Juste
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.061

5.  Microbial Proteins in Stomach Biopsies Associated with Gastritis, Ulcer, and Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Shahid Aziz; Faisal Rasheed; Tayyab Saeed Akhter; Rabaab Zahra; Simone König
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.927

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.