Literature DB >> 33526992

Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.

Sang Il Kim1, Jiwoo Lee1, Jiyun Hong1, Sung Jong Lee2, Dong Choon Park1, Joo Hee Yoon1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes of open radical hysterectomy and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIS) in early stage cervical cancer.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 148 patients with stage IB1 - IIA2 cervical cancer who underwent either minimally invasive or open radical hysterectomy. Tumor characteristics, recurrence rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared according to surgical approach.
RESULTS: In total, 110 and 38 patients were assigned to open surgery and MIS groups. After a medical follow-up of 42.1 months, the groups showed similar survival outcomes (recurrence rate, DFS, and OS). However, in patients with tumor size >2 cm, recurrence rate was significantly higher in MIS group (22.5% vs 0%; p=0.008). And in patients with tumor size >2 cm, MIS group showed significantly poorer DFS than open surgery group (p=0.017), although OS was similar between the two groups (p=0.252).
CONCLUSION: In patients with tumor size >2 cm, MIS was associated with higher recurrence rates and poorer DFS than open surgery. However, in patients with tumor size ≤2 cm, MIS did not seem to compromise oncologic outcomes. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  LACC trial; cervical cancer; laparoscopic surgery; minimally invasive surgery; radical hysterectomy

Year:  2021        PMID： 33526992      PMCID： PMC7847619          DOI： 10.7150/ijms.55017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Sci        ISSN： 1449-1907            Impact factor:   3.738


  20 in total

1.  Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Hong Juan Chu; Chun Liang Shang; Xiao Gong; Tian Yu Liu; Yun He Zhao; Jia Ming Huang; Shu-Zhong Yao
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Lesley B Conrad; Pedro T Ramirez; William Burke; R Wendel Naumann; Kari L Ring; Mark F Munsell; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Se Ik Kim; Jae Hyun Cho; Aeran Seol; Young Im Kim; Maria Lee; Hee Seung Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae-Weon Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong-Sang Song
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Melamed; Daniel J Margul; Ling Chen; Nancy L Keating; Marcela G Del Carmen; Junhua Yang; Brandon-Luke L Seagle; Amy Alexander; Emma L Barber; Laurel W Rice; Jason D Wright; Masha Kocherginsky; Shohreh Shahabi; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Rene Pareja; Aldo Lopez; Marcelo Vieira; Reitan Ribeiro; Alessandro Buda; Xiaojian Yan; Yao Shuzhong; Naven Chetty; David Isla; Mariano Tamura; Tao Zhu; Kristy P Robledo; Val Gebski; Rebecca Asher; Vanessa Behan; James L Nicklin; Robert L Coleman; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Wui-Jin Koh; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Sarah Bean; Kristin Bradley; Susana M Campos; Kathleen R Cho; Hye Sook Chon; Christina Chu; Rachel Clark; David Cohn; Marta Ann Crispens; Shari Damast; Oliver Dorigo; Patricia J Eifel; Christine M Fisher; Peter Frederick; David K Gaffney; Ernest Han; Warner K Huh; John R Lurain; Andrea Mariani; David Mutch; Christa Nagel; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Amanda Nickles Fader; Steven W Remmenga; R Kevin Reynolds; Todd Tillmanns; Stefanie Ueda; Emily Wyse; Catheryn M Yashar; Nicole R McMillian; Jillian L Scavone
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.693

8.  Incidence of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in Korea during 1999-2015.

Authors:  Myong Cheol Lim; Young Joo Won; Mun Jung Ko; Miseon Kim; Seung Hyuk Shim; Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanao; Koji Matsuo; Yoichi Aoki; Terumi Tanigawa; Hidetaka Nomura; Sanshiro Okamoto; Nobuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 10.  Unexpected result of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanao; Yoichi Aoki; Nobuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.401
View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessment for the minimal invasiveness of laparoscopic liver resection by interleukin-6 and thrombospondin-1.

Authors:  Takayoshi Kaida; Hiromitsu Hayashi; Hiroki Sato; Shotaro Kinoshita; Takashi Matsumoto; Yuta Shiraishi; Yuki Kitano; Takaaki Higashi; Katsunori Imai; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-27

2.  Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mengting Zhang; Wei Dai; Yuexiu Si; Yetan Shi; Xiangyuan Li; Ke Jiang; Jingyi Shen; Liying Ying
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocol for Early Discharge within 12 Hours after Robotic Radical Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Peter C Lim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Khayal Gasimli; Lisa Wilhelm; Sven Becker; Rudy Leon De Wilde; Morva Tahmasbi Rad
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  The early surgical period in robotic radical hysterectomy is related to the recurrence after surgery in stage IB cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Peter C Lim
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter.

Authors:  Si Sun; Jing Cai; Ruixie Li; Yujia Wang; Jing Zhao; Yuhui Huang; Linjuan Xu; Qiang Yang; Zehua Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.493
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.