Literature DB >> 33526782

Combined effects of genotype and childhood adversity shape variability of DNA methylation across age.

Darina Czamara1, Elleke Tissink2, Johanna Tuhkanen3, Jade Martins4, Yvonne Awaloff5, Amanda J Drake6, Batbayar Khulan6, Aarno Palotie7, Sibylle M Winter8, Charles B Nemeroff9, W Edward Craighead10, Boadie W Dunlop10, Helen S Mayberg10,11, Becky Kinkead10, Sanjay J Mathew12, Dan V Iosifescu11,13, Thomas C Neylan14, Christine M Heim15, Jari Lahti3,16, Johan G Eriksson17,18,19,20, Katri Räikkönen3, Kerry J Ressler21, Nadine Provençal22,23, Elisabeth B Binder24,25.   

Abstract

Lasting effects of adversity, such as exposure to childhood adversity (CA) on disease risk, may be embedded via epigenetic mechanisms but findings from human studies investigating the main effects of such exposure on epigenetic measures, including DNA methylation (DNAm), are inconsistent. Studies in perinatal tissues indicate that variability of DNAm at birth is best explained by the joint effects of genotype and prenatal environment. Here, we extend these analyses to postnatal stressors. We investigated the contribution of CA, cis genotype (G), and their additive (G + CA) and interactive (G × CA) effects to DNAm variability in blood or saliva from five independent cohorts with a total sample size of 1074 ranging in age from childhood to late adulthood. Of these, 541 were exposed to CA, which was assessed retrospectively using self-reports or verified through social services and registries. For the majority of sites (over 50%) in the adult cohorts, variability in DNAm was best explained by G + CA or G × CA but almost never by CA alone. Across ages and tissues, 1672 DNAm sites showed consistency of the best model in all five cohorts, with G × CA interactions explaining most variance. The consistent G × CA sites mapped to genes enriched in brain-specific transcripts and Gene Ontology terms related to development and synaptic function. Interaction of CA with genotypes showed the strongest contribution to DNAm variability, with stable effects across cohorts in functionally relevant genes. This underscores the importance of including genotype in studies investigating the impact of environmental factors on epigenetic marks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33526782      PMCID: PMC7851167          DOI: 10.1038/s41398-020-01147-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Psychiatry        ISSN: 2158-3188            Impact factor:   6.222


  51 in total

1.  The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Leek; W Evan Johnson; Hilary S Parker; Andrew E Jaffe; John D Storey
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  DNA methylation: a mechanism for embedding early life experiences in the genome.

Authors:  Moshe Szyf; Johanna Bick
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-08-10

3.  Treatment barriers for low-income, urban African Americans with undiagnosed posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Regina G Davis; Kerry J Ressler; Ann C Schwartz; Kisha James Stephens; Rebekah G Bradley
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2008-04

4.  Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Olga G Troyanskaya
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Predictors of remission in depression to individual and combined treatments (PReDICT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Elisabeth B Binder; Joseph F Cubells; Mark M Goodman; Mary E Kelley; Becky Kinkead; Michael Kutner; Charles B Nemeroff; D Jeffrey Newport; Michael J Owens; Thaddeus W W Pace; James C Ritchie; Vivianne Aponte Rivera; Drew Westen; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  The effect of genotype and in utero environment on interindividual variation in neonate DNA methylomes.

Authors:  Ai Ling Teh; Hong Pan; Li Chen; Mei-Lyn Ong; Shaillay Dogra; Johnny Wong; Julia L MacIsaac; Sarah M Mah; Lisa M McEwen; Seang-Mei Saw; Keith M Godfrey; Yap-Seng Chong; Kenneth Kwek; Chee-Keong Kwoh; Shu-E Soh; Mary F F Chong; Sheila Barton; Neerja Karnani; Clara Y Cheong; Jan Paul Buschdorf; Walter Stünkel; Michael S Kobor; Michael J Meaney; Peter D Gluckman; Joanna D Holbrook
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Integrated analysis of environmental and genetic influences on cord blood DNA methylation in new-borns.

Authors:  Darina Czamara; Gökçen Eraslan; Christian M Page; Jari Lahti; Marius Lahti-Pulkkinen; Esa Hämäläinen; Eero Kajantie; Hannele Laivuori; Pia M Villa; Rebecca M Reynolds; Wenche Nystad; Siri E Håberg; Stephanie J London; Kieran J O'Donnell; Elika Garg; Michael J Meaney; Sonja Entringer; Pathik D Wadhwa; Claudia Buss; Meaghan J Jones; David T S Lin; Julie L MacIsaac; Michael S Kobor; Nastassja Koen; Heather J Zar; Karestan C Koenen; Shareefa Dalvie; Dan J Stein; Ivan Kondofersky; Nikola S Müller; Fabian J Theis; Katri Räikkönen; Elisabeth B Binder
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Methylation quantitative trait loci (meQTLs) are consistently detected across ancestry, developmental stage, and tissue type.

Authors:  Alicia K Smith; Varun Kilaru; Mehmet Kocak; Lynn M Almli; Kristina B Mercer; Kerry J Ressler; Frances A Tylavsky; Karen N Conneely
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Mapping of Variable DNA Methylation Across Multiple Cell Types Defines a Dynamic Regulatory Landscape of the Human Genome.

Authors:  Junchen Gu; Michael Stevens; Xiaoyun Xing; Daofeng Li; Bo Zhang; Jacqueline E Payton; Eugene M Oltz; James N Jarvis; Kaiyu Jiang; Theodore Cicero; Joseph F Costello; Ting Wang
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Epigenomic profiling of men exposed to early-life stress reveals DNA methylation differences in association with current mental state.

Authors:  B Khulan; J R Manning; D R Dunbar; J R Seckl; K Raikkonen; J G Eriksson; A J Drake
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Biological Effects of Trauma.

Authors:  Shareefa Dalvie; Nikolaos P Daskalakis
Journal:  Complex Psychiatry       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 2.  Epigenetics as a Biomarker for Early-Life Environmental Exposure.

Authors:  Rose Schrott; Ashley Song; Christine Ladd-Acosta
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-07-30

Review 3.  Childhood Trauma and Epigenetics: State of the Science and Future.

Authors:  N Gladish; S M Merrill; Michael S Kobor
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-10-15

4.  First Steps towards the Development of Epigenetic Biomarkers in Female Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus).

Authors:  Alexandra Weyrich; Tania P Guerrero-Altamirano; Selma Yasar; Gábor Á Czirják; Bettina Wachter; Jörns Fickel
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20

5.  Epigenetics of early-life adversity in youth: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sumner; Simone Gambazza; Xu Gao; Andrea A Baccarelli; Monica Uddin; Katie A McLaughlin
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.551

6.  RPS6KA5 methylation predict response to 6-week treatment for adolescent MDD patients.

Authors:  Peiwei Xu; Yuanmei Tao; Hang Zhang; Meijiang Jin; Hanmei Xu; Shoukang Zou; Fang Deng; Lijuan Huang; Hong Zhang; Xiaolan Wang; Xiaowei Tang; Zaiquan Dong; Yanping Wang; Li Yin; Xueli Sun
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.144

7.  Childhood adversity correlates with stable changes in DNA methylation trajectories in children and converges with epigenetic signatures of prenatal stress.

Authors:  Jade Martins; Darina Czamara; Susann Sauer; Monika Rex-Haffner; Katja Dittrich; Peggy Dörr; Karin de Punder; Judith Overfeld; Andrea Knop; Felix Dammering; Sonja Entringer; Sibylle M Winter; Claudia Buss; Christine Heim; Elisabeth B Binder
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2021-05-13

Review 8.  Influence of Psychological Factors in Breast and Lung Cancer Risk - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maria Angelina Pereira; António Araújo; Mário Simões; Catarina Costa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-03

9.  Anxiety and depression-like behaviours are more frequent in aged male mice conceived by ART compared with natural conception.

Authors:  Ning-Xin Qin; Yi-Ran Zhao; Wei-Hui Shi; Zhi-Yang Zhou; Ke-Xin Zou; Chuan-Jin Yu; Xia Liu; Ze-Han Dong; Yi-Ting Mao; Cheng-Liang Zhou; Jia-Le Yu; Xin-Mei Liu; Jian-Zhong Sheng; Guo-Lian Ding; Wen-Long Zhao; Yan-Ting Wu; He-Feng Huang
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.906

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.