Literature DB >> 33526398

The Hip-Spine Relationship in Total Hip Arthroplasty: How to Execute the Plan.

Abhinav K Sharma1, Jonathan M Vigdorchik1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with spinopelvic pathology, including lumbar spine stiffness and sagittal spinal deformity, are at increased risk for postoperative complications, including instability, dislocation, and revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent evidence has suggested that the Lewinnek safe zone should no longer be considered an appropriate target for all patients, especially those with spinopelvic pathology, as the safe zone is a dynamic rather than static target. There are 2 distinct issues for arthroplasty surgeons to consider: lumbar spinal stiffness and sagittal spinal deformity, each of which has its own management.
METHODS: In order to manage patients with spinopelvic pathology undergoing THA, a basic understanding of spinopelvic parameters, including sagittal balance, sacral slope, and anterior pelvic plane, is essential. Techniques outlined in this manuscript describe a systematic preoperative work-up and intraoperative management of acetabular component positioning according to patient-specific spinopelvic parameters, ensuring optimal component placement and a reduced risk for impingement, instability, and poor postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: Evaluation of each patient's spinopelvic parameters informs patient classification according to the Hip-Spine Classification for THA. Patient classification is determined by the presence of spinal stiffness and spinal deformity, with corresponding scoring and classification into one of the 4 categories used to determine risk for postoperative dislocation, define patient-specific cup positioning, and create their functional safe zone.
CONCLUSION: A simple 2-step preoperative assessment with measurements of the anterior pelvic plane and the sacral slope on standing and seated lateral X-rays will identify patients at high risk for postoperative dislocation due to spinal deformity and/or stiffness. Accounting for spinopelvic pathology and adhering to the Hip-Spine Classification guidelines for acetabular component positioning can help reduce the burden of instability and revisions in this complex patient population.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hip-spine relationship; instability; spinal deformity; spinal stiffness; spinopelvic mobility; total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 33526398     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

Review 1.  Hip-spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty - Simplifying the concepts.

Authors:  Sahil Batra; Tarun Khare; Apoorva Praveen Kabra; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  Abnormal spinopelvic mobility as a risk factor for acetabular placement error in total hip arthroplasty using optical computer-assisted surgical navigation system.

Authors:  Seong J Jang; Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Eric W Windsor; Ran Schwarzkopf; David J Mayman; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-06

3.  Limited lumbopelvic mobility does not influence short-term outcomes after primary hip arthroscopy: a propensity-matched controlled study.

Authors:  Andrew E Jimenez; James D Fox; Kara Miecznikowski; David R Maldonado; Benjamin R Saks; Hari K Ankem; Payam W Sabetian; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-08-26

4.  Total hip arthroplasty has higher complication rates in stiff spine patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sung Huang Laurent Tsai; Ngi Chiong Lau; Wei Cheng Chen; Ruei-Shyuan Chien; Eric H Tischler; Tsai-Sheng Fu; Dave Wei-Chih Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 2.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.