Noora Knaappila1, Mauri Marttunen2, Sari Fröjd3, Nina Lindberg4, Riittakerttu Kaltiala3,5,6. 1. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, 33014, Tampere, Finland. noora.knaappila@tuni.fi. 2. Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, PO Box 22, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland. 3. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, 33014, Tampere, Finland. 4. Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 590, 00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. 5. Vanha Vaasa Hospital, Vierinkiventie 1, 65380, Vaasa, Finland. 6. Department of Adolescent Psychiatry, Tampere University Hospital, 33380, Pitkäniemi, Finland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite reduced sanctions and more permissive attitudes toward cannabis use in the USA and Europe, the prevalences of adolescent cannabis use have remained rather stable in the twenty-first century. However, whether trends in adolescent cannabis use differ between socioeconomic groups is not known. The aim of this study was to examine trends in cannabis use according to socioeconomic status among Finnish adolescents from 2000 to 2015. METHODS: A population-based school survey was conducted biennially among 14-16-year-old Finns between 2000 and 2015 (n = 761,278). Distributions for any and frequent cannabis use over time according to socioeconomic adversities were calculated using crosstabs and chi-square test. Associations between any and frequent cannabis use, time, and socioeconomic adversities were studied using binomial logistic regression results shown by odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: At the overall level, the prevalences of lifetime and frequent cannabis use varied only slightly between 2000 and 2015. Cannabis use was associated with socioeconomic adversities (parental unemployment in the past year, low parental education, and not living with both parents). The differences in any and frequent cannabis use between socioeconomic groups increased significantly over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall changes in the prevalence of adolescent cannabis use were modest, cannabis use increased markedly among adolescents with the most socioeconomic adversities. Socioeconomic adversities should be considered in the prevention of adolescent cannabis use.
BACKGROUND: Despite reduced sanctions and more permissive attitudes toward cannabis use in the USA and Europe, the prevalences of adolescent cannabis use have remained rather stable in the twenty-first century. However, whether trends in adolescent cannabis use differ between socioeconomic groups is not known. The aim of this study was to examine trends in cannabis use according to socioeconomic status among Finnish adolescents from 2000 to 2015. METHODS: A population-based school survey was conducted biennially among 14-16-year-old Finns between 2000 and 2015 (n = 761,278). Distributions for any and frequent cannabis use over time according to socioeconomic adversities were calculated using crosstabs and chi-square test. Associations between any and frequent cannabis use, time, and socioeconomic adversities were studied using binomial logistic regression results shown by odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: At the overall level, the prevalences of lifetime and frequent cannabis use varied only slightly between 2000 and 2015. Cannabis use was associated with socioeconomic adversities (parental unemployment in the past year, low parental education, and not living with both parents). The differences in any and frequent cannabis use between socioeconomic groups increased significantly over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall changes in the prevalence of adolescent cannabis use were modest, cannabis use increased markedly among adolescents with the most socioeconomic adversities. Socioeconomic adversities should be considered in the prevention of adolescent cannabis use.
Authors: Jorge Delva; John M Wallace; Patrick M O'Malley; Jerald G Bachman; Lloyd D Johnston; John E Schulenberg Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Bruna Galobardes; Mary Shaw; Debbie A Lawlor; John W Lynch; George Davey Smith Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Limin X Clegg; Marsha E Reichman; Barry A Miller; Benjamin F Hankey; Gopal K Singh; Yi Dan Lin; Marc T Goodman; Charles F Lynch; Stephen M Schwartz; Vivien W Chen; Leslie Bernstein; Scarlett L Gomez; John J Graff; Charles C Lin; Norman J Johnson; Brenda K Edwards Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2008-11-12 Impact factor: 2.506