Literature DB >> 33525446

Influence of Flow Disturbances behind the 90° Bend on the Indications of the Ultrasonic Flow Meter with Clamp-On Sensors on Pipelines.

Piotr Synowiec1, Artur Andruszkiewicz1, Wiesław Wędrychowicz1, Piotr Piechota1, Elżbieta Wróblewska1.   

Abstract

The subject matter of the article concerns velocities/flow rate measurements in the area of disturbed flows-behind the 90° bend. They were conducted by means of an ultrasonic flowmeter with clamp-on sensors on pipeline, for water and two different Reynolds numbers of 70,000 and 100,000, corresponding to two velocities of approximately 1.42 m/s and 2.04 m/s. The tests were carried out at 12 distances from the disturbance. Sensors on the circumference of the pipeline were mounted 30° each. The correction factor values were calculated for the given measurement geometry. The measurements have shown that the values of this coefficient are always greater than 1, which means that the ultrasonic flow meter understates the speed values. They also showed that already at a distance of 8 nominal diameters from the disturbance, the correction factor does not exceed 1.02, so the measurement errors are within the maximum permissible error (MPE) of a typical ultrasonic flow meter. For distances less than eight nominal diameters from the disturbance, not taking the correction factor value into the account can lead to systematic errors of up to 10.8%. Studies have also proved that in each measurement plane behind the disturbance there are two mounting angles for the ultrasonic sensors, 60° and 240° respectively, for which the correction factor values are minimal. Additionally, using the laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) method, velocity solids were determined at individual distances from the disturbance, and the projections of velocity blocks on the appropriate plane represented velocity profiles and indicated the distances from the disturbance at which these profiles stabilise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LDA; balancing; flow velocity; laser Doppler anemometer; ultrasonic flow meter

Year:  2021        PMID: 33525446      PMCID: PMC7865690          DOI: 10.3390/s21030868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  4 in total

1.  Calculation of geometric flow profile correction factor for ultrasonic flow meter using semi-3D simulation technique.

Authors:  Seyed Foad Mousavi; Seyed Hassan Hashemabadi; Jalil Jamali
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  New Analysis Scheme of Flow-Acoustic Coupling for Gas Ultrasonic Flowmeter with Vortex near the Transducer.

Authors:  Yanzhao Sun; Tao Zhang; Dandan Zheng
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Flow Velocity Measurement Using a Spatial Averaging Method with Two-Dimensional Flexural Ultrasonic Array Technology.

Authors:  Lei Kang; Andrew Feeney; Riliang Su; David Lines; Sivaram Nishal Ramadas; George Rowlands; Steve Dixon
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Multi-Angle Liquid Flow Measurement Using Ultrasonic Linear Array Transducer.

Authors:  Thi Huong Ly Nguyen; Suhyun Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.