Literature DB >> 33525238

Exploring the emergence of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Rapid Review.

Vidhi Jain1, Tanuj Kanchan2, Kewal Krishan3.   

Abstract

Novel Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for the global pandemic of COVID-19. It has been shown to spread through respiratory droplets, direct contact and environmental fomites. The possibility of its spread by other modes viz. airborne, fecal-oral, vertical, etc. is being explored and can have implications in planning preventive strategies and disease management. A systematic analysis was carried out using the keywords; "COVID 19 vertical transmission", "SARS-CoV-2 pregnancy", and "SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission", and the cases suggestive of possible vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 were studied in detail. The available evidences point at a possibility of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33525238      PMCID: PMC7927489          DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i4.10852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomed        ISSN: 0392-4203


Introduction and background

SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2) is responsible for the global pandemic of COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019). The current research and evidence suggest that the novel coronavirus predominantly spreads from person to person through direct contact or by inhalation of droplets generated through coughing, sneezing and speaking, originating from the infected person (1,2). It has also been established that the virus may spread by touching the environmental fomites and infected surfaces (3). According to recent communications, it has been cautioned that the airborne transmission is an important factor and contributes to the spread of the virus especially in the crowed places with poor ventilation (4,5). After eight months of continuous research, not much is known about the modes of transmission of this novel virus, however, the possibility of its spread by some other modes of transmission such as the fecal-oral, vertical, through flatus, ocular surface, blood borne, animal-to-human etc. is being explored and can have implications in planning preventive strategies and disease management (6). Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is plausible due to some of its unique features. For one, its receptor Angiotensin-converting enzyme -2 (ACE-2) is suitably expressed in the human placenta (7). Second, it has an alleged structural similarity to HIV-1 proteins (8) and shows therapeutic response to anti-retroviral drugs. Third, it is an RNA virus like Zika. Materno-fetal transfer is well-established in both Zika and HIV. Clinically, COVID-19 can be suspected in adult patients with non-specific clinical presentations like fever, cough, sore throat, anosmia, body ache etc., the majority of cases remain asymptomatic and maternal diagnosis must therefore be established by laboratory testing. The clinical dilemma of diagnosing a neonate with COVID-19, especially asymptomatic presentations, also requires the same confirmatory test. While real time reverse transcriptase PCR on respiratory specimens for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA remains the gold standard for diagnosis of COVID-19 in all age groups (9). Various newer approaches like antigen testing, antibody detection and serum inflammatory markers have been tried worldwide with various degrees of diagnostic success (10). Most of the existing reviews and meta-analysis on this topic have focussed on RT-PCR COVID-19 positive mothers and the possibility of vertical transmission in their outcomes. However, there is a paucity of reviews focussed solely on neonates with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis soon after birth.

A review and analysis of studies regarding vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2

With this background, a systematic analysis of the available literature was carried out using the keywords; “COVID 19 vertical transmission”, “SARS-CoV-2 pregnancy”, and “SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission”. Among all reported COVID-19 pregnancies only those cases with RT-PCR confirmed new-borns were studied in detail for the plausibility of Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2. A total of 12 new-borns (11-17) with confirmed COVID-19 infections were identified in literature at the time of writing. While a review of 55 pregnancies (7) did not show any evidence of vertical transmission, a total of 6 studies comprising 11 new-borns (11-15,18) has presented striking arguments in favour of vertical transmission of SARS CoV-2 (Table 1). Pregnancy with COVID-19 has been associated with pre-term birth in >20% cases and perinatal death in 7% which suggests that fetal risk associated with the infection is worth investigating (19).
Table 1.

A rapid review of cases suggesting possible vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2

ParameterWang et al (11)Dong et al (12)Zeng et al (13)Alzamora et al (14)Zamaniyan et al (15)Yu et al (18)
Number of new-borns116111
Gestational age40 weeks (Emergency LSCS)37 weeks, 6 days (Elective LSCS)Full -term (Elective LSCS)33 weeks; pre-term32 weeks; pre-term (Emergency LSCS)39 weeks + 6 days (Emergency LSCS)
Clinical symptomsAsymptomaticAsymptomaticAsymptomaticMild respiratory difficulty on day 6Fever at birthAsymptomatic
Investigations undertaken on the new-borns:
Nasopharyngeal aspirate RT-PCRPositive after 36 hours of birthNegativeNegativePositive at 16 hours of birthPositive after 1 weekPositive at 6hrs of birth
Cord blood RT-PCRNegativeNot doneNot doneNot doneNegativeNot done
Serum RT-PCRNot doneNot doneNegativeNot doneNot doneNot done
Anti- SARS-CoV -2 IgMNot doneElevated (at 2 hours of birth)Elevated in 2 casesNegativeNot doneNot done
Anti- SARS-CoV-2 IgGNot doneElevated (at 2 hours of birth)Elevated in 5 casesNegativeNot doneNot done
Inflammatory cytokine IL-6Not doneNot doneElevated in all 6 casesNot doneNot doneNot done
Maternal investigations:
Nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCRPositivePositivePositivePositivePositivePositive
Amniotic fluid RT-PCRNegativeNot doneNot doneNot donePositiveNot done
Anti- SARS-CoV -2 IgMNot donePositiveElevated in 4 casesPositive on post-partum day 4Not doneNot done
Anti- SARS-CoV-2 IgGNot donePositiveElevated in 5 casesPositive on post-partum day 4Not doneNot done
Placental tissue RT-PCRNegativeNot doneNot doneNot doneNot doneNot done
Vaginal secretion RT-PCRNot doneNegativeNot doneNot doneNegativeNot done
Breast milk RT-PCRNegativeNegativeNot doneNot doneNot doneNot done
Associated maternal mortality--------Yes (19 days post- LSCS)-
Pre-op prophylaxisRecombinant human interferon alfa 1b and GanciclovirDetails not mentionedDetails not mentionedHydroxychloroquine and OseltamivirHydroxychloroquine Lopinavir, ritonavir, and OseltamivirOseltamivir, ganciclovir, interferon + antibiotics
Our inferences on possibility of vertical transmissionNeonatal Nasopharyngeal RT-PCR positive at 36 hours suggests possible vertical transmissionElevated neonatal IgM at birth suggests possible vertical transmissionElevated neonatal IgM at birth suggests possible vertical transmissionPositive neonatal Nasopharyngeal RT-PCR at 16 hours suggests possible vertical transmissionPositive amniotic fluid and neonatal Nasopharyngeal RT PCR suggests possible vertical transmissionPositive neonatal Nasopharyngeal RT-PCR at 6 hours suggests possible vertical transmission
A rapid review of cases suggesting possible vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Among the reported cases, demonstration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in amniotic fluid by RT-PCR at the time of delivery (15) is a strong argument in favour of vertical transmission, at least in cases where maternal infection was severe in peripartum period. The fact that the nasopharyngeal RT-PCR was positive in three neonates born by LSCS, which obviated the possibility of acquisition of the virus from the birth canal (11,14,15), further strengthens the possibility of vertical transmission. The neonates reviewed in this study had all been delivered via caesarean section, however, it has been previously established that there is no measurable safety of LSCS over vaginal birth in COVID-19 pregnancies (20). Since all the maternal SARS-CoV-2 reports were confirmed before delivery, the claim of strict adherence to contact, droplet and airborne precautions during the peri and postpartum period in all these cases, is believable, rendering the possibility of nosocomial acquisition by the new-born very low. The detection of IgM in the new-born, also favours the possibility of in-utero contact with the virus, as being a large molecule, it does not cross the intact placenta and cannot be acquired from the mother. The results of neonatal RT-PCR positivity alone may not be sufficient to prove vertical transmission. A recent review and meta-analysis may have pre-maturely asserted a vertical transmission rate of 3.2% based on a combination of positive neonatal nasopharyngeal, cord-blood, rectal swab and serology (21). We feel it would be prudent to gather more definitive evidence before a consensus opinion can be agreed upon. The vertical transmission of COVID-19 has remained a topic of debate since the last 8 months but can it be proven at all? Theoretically, it will require SARS-CoV-2 RNA to be demonstrable in the respiratory secretions of the mother and newborn, as well as in the placenta, membranes or other products on conception in the same delivery outcome. Those seeking the answer will have to adopt a planned prospective approach and conduct molecular testing of all the specimens enumerated above, perhaps more than once, to rule out false negatives. The development of more sensitive viral nucleic acid load detection methods remains the need of the hour. The non-detection of viral nucleic acid in umbilical cord blood, placenta, amniotic fluid and breast milk (11) in some studies could simply be due to low viral load, poor sensitivity of existing techniques, flawed timing of amniocentesis and effective pre-operative antiviral administration.

Conclusion

In light of the above findings, there seems to be a strong possibility of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2, if the same can be virologically proven. If proven, there would be an urgent need to device sensitive and economical screening tests in pregnancy, effective pre-operative anti-viral regimens, operative protocols, guidelines for new-born screening and safety of breastfeeding etc. The current evidence is limited by the non-availability of Maternal Serum viral RNA load which, akin to HIV, may be tried as a predictor of the risk of vertical transmission, paired with amniotic fluid testing in severe maternal illness. The same may be considered before elective COVID-19 caesareans in future studies. Any publications on fetal outcomes of mothers with severe infection, who could not receive timely hydroxy-chloroquine and pre-operative antivirals, will also fill the gaps in our current understanding of the topic. Global reporting of all COVID-19 pregnancies using COVI-Preg, a structured data collection (22) will assist in swift formulation of management guidelines for the same.
  19 in total

1.  Possible Vertical Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 From an Infected Mother to Her Newborn.

Authors:  Lan Dong; Jinhua Tian; Songming He; Chuchao Zhu; Jian Wang; Chen Liu; Jing Yang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Neonatal Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) Infection: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Vikramaditya Dumpa; Ranjith Kamity; Alexandra N Vinci; Estela Noyola; Asif Noor
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-17

3.  COVID-19 in a 26-week preterm neonate.

Authors:  Fiammetta Piersigilli; Katherine Carkeek; Catheline Hocq; Bénédicte van Grambezen; Corinne Hubinont; Olga Chatzis; Dimitri Van der Linden; Olivier Danhaive
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-05-07

4.  An international registry for emergent pathogens and pregnancy.

Authors:  Alice Panchaud; Guillaume Favre; Leo Pomar; Manon Vouga; Karoline Aebi-Popp; David Baud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.

Authors:  Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Shuofeng Yuan; Kin-Hang Kok; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Hin Chu; Jin Yang; Fanfan Xing; Jieling Liu; Cyril Chik-Yan Yip; Rosana Wing-Shan Poon; Hoi-Wah Tsoi; Simon Kam-Fai Lo; Kwok-Hung Chan; Vincent Kwok-Man Poon; Wan-Mui Chan; Jonathan Daniel Ip; Jian-Piao Cai; Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng; Honglin Chen; Christopher Kim-Ming Hui; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  It Is Time to Address Airborne Transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Donald K Milton
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality.

Authors:  Lidia Morawska; Junji Cao
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Clinical features and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnant patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective, single-centre, descriptive study.

Authors:  Nan Yu; Wei Li; Qingling Kang; Zhi Xiong; Shaoshuai Wang; Xingguang Lin; Yanyan Liu; Juan Xiao; Haiyi Liu; Dongrui Deng; Suhua Chen; Wanjiang Zeng; Ling Feng; Jianli Wu
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  Laboratory Diagnosis of COVID-19: Current Issues and Challenges.

Authors:  Yi-Wei Tang; Jonathan E Schmitz; David H Persing; Charles W Stratton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy.

Authors:  Pradip Dashraath; Jing Lin Jeslyn Wong; Mei Xian Karen Lim; Li Min Lim; Sarah Li; Arijit Biswas; Mahesh Choolani; Citra Mattar; Lin Lin Su
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.