| Literature DB >> 33524586 |
Stéphane Marot1, Vincent Calvez1, Martine Louet2, Anne-Geneviève Marcelin1, Sonia Burrel3.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33524586 PMCID: PMC7845522 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.01.017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect ISSN: 1198-743X Impact factor: 8.067
Fig. 1(A) Virus isolation success in relation to Ct value of the RT-PCR targeting the E viral gene. Red circles and blue diamonds represent positive and negative cell culture assays, respectively. Empty and half-filled symbols showed clinical samples with no E subgenomic or E negative-strand RNA signal detected, respectively. Crossing threshold (Ct) values of 28 and 33 correspond to 5.83 and 4.34 log10 copies/mL (cp/mL), respectively. (B) Subgenomic viral and negative-strand RNAs in relation to viralore E genomic RNA. The ratios are depicted according to the number of days after the onset of symptoms. Dots represent mean values of RT-PCR data obtained from at least two independent experiments on samples from individual healthcare workers (HCWs). Plots show median values with interquartile ranges. Data concerning date of symptom onset were confidently available for 54 HCWs (88.5%); HCWs with no precise data were excluded from the analysis. E subgenomic (‘E leader’) and E negative-strand RNAs were never detected beyond 7 days after the onset of symptoms, except at 12 days after the onset of symptoms for HCW N°35 who experienced persistent clinical signs at the time of sampling. Moreover, no isolate was recovered from the clinical sample of this patient (viral load 5.83 log10 copies/mL). AS, asymptomatic HCWs.