Evanly Vo1, Samy Rengasamy2, Susan Xu2, Matthew Horvatin3, Ziqing Zhuang2. 1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: eav8@cdc.gov. 2. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Amentum, Aiken, SC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A major concern among health care experts is a shortage of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during a pandemic. One option for mitigating an FFR shortage is to decontaminate and reuse the devices. The focus of this study was to develop a new evaluation technique based on 3 major decontamination requirements: (1) inactivating viruses, (2) not altering the respirator properties, and (3) not leaving any toxic byproduct on the FFR. METHODS: Hydrophilic and hydrophobic FFRs were contaminated with MS2 virus. In the solution-based deposition, the virus-containing liquid droplets were spiked directly onto FFRs, while in the vapor-based and aerosol-based depositions, the viral particles were loaded onto FFRs using a bio-aerosol testing system. Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) and moist heat (MH) decontamination methods were used for inactivation of viruses applied to FFRs. RESULTS: Both UVGI and MH methods inactivated viruses (>5-log reduction of MS2 virus; in 92% of both method experiments, the virus was reduced to levels below the detection limit), did not alter the respirator properties, and did not leave any toxic byproduct on the FFRs. CONCLUSIONS: Both UVGI and MH methods could be considered as promising decontamination candidates for inactivation of viruses for respirator reuse during shortages.
BACKGROUND: A major concern among health care experts is a shortage of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) during a pandemic. One option for mitigating an FFR shortage is to decontaminate and reuse the devices. The focus of this study was to develop a new evaluation technique based on 3 major decontamination requirements: (1) inactivating viruses, (2) not altering the respirator properties, and (3) not leaving any toxic byproduct on the FFR. METHODS: Hydrophilic and hydrophobic FFRs were contaminated with MS2 virus. In the solution-based deposition, the virus-containing liquid droplets were spiked directly onto FFRs, while in the vapor-based and aerosol-based depositions, the viral particles were loaded onto FFRs using a bio-aerosol testing system. Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) and moist heat (MH) decontamination methods were used for inactivation of viruses applied to FFRs. RESULTS: Both UVGI and MH methods inactivated viruses (>5-log reduction of MS2 virus; in 92% of both method experiments, the virus was reduced to levels below the detection limit), did not alter the respirator properties, and did not leave any toxic byproduct on the FFRs. CONCLUSIONS: Both UVGI and MH methods could be considered as promising decontamination candidates for inactivation of viruses for respirator reuse during shortages.
Authors: Brian K Heimbuch; William H Wallace; Kimberly Kinney; April E Lumley; Chang-Yu Wu; Myung-Heui Woo; Joseph D Wander Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: William G Lindsley; Francoise M Blachere; Kristina A Davis; Terri A Pearce; Melanie A Fisher; Rashida Khakoo; Stephen M Davis; Mark E Rogers; Robert E Thewlis; Jose A Posada; John B Redrow; Ismail B Celik; Bean T Chen; Donald H Beezhold Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: C Carolina Ontiveros; David C Shoults; Sean MacIsaac; Kyle D Rauch; Crystal L Sweeney; Amina K Stoddart; Graham A Gagnon Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 4.379