Literature DB >> 33524069

A breeding pool of ideas: Analyzing interdisciplinary collaborations at the Complex Systems Summer School.

Jacqueline Brown1, Dakota Murray2, Kyle Furlong3, Emily Coco4, Fabian Dablander5.   

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research is essential for the study of complex systems, and so there is a growing need to understand the factors that facilitate collaboration across diverse fields of inquiry. In this exploratory study, we examine the composition of self-organized project groups and the structure of collaboration networks at the Santa Fe Institute's Complex Systems Summer School. Using data from all iterations of the summer school from 2005 to 2019, comprising 823 participants and 322 projects, we investigate the factors that contribute to group composition. We first test for homophily with respect to individual-level attributes, finding that group composition is largely consistent with random mixing based on gender, career position, institutional prestige, and country of study. However, we find some evidence of homophilic preference in group composition based on disciplinary background. We then conduct analyses at the level of group projects, finding that project topics from the Social and Behavioral Sciences are over-represented. This could be due to a higher level of baseline interest in, or knowledge of, social and behavioral sciences, or the common application of methods from the natural sciences to problems in the social sciences. Consequently, future research should explore this discrepancy further and examine whether it can be mitigated through policies aimed at making topics in other disciplines more accessible or appealing for collaboration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33524069      PMCID: PMC7850475          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  9 in total

1.  How to solve the world's biggest problems.

Authors:  Heidi Ledford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Choosing Work Group Members: Balancing Similarity, Competence, and Familiarity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2000-03

Review 3.  Complexity of coupled human and natural systems.

Authors:  Jianguo Liu; Thomas Dietz; Stephen R Carpenter; Marina Alberti; Carl Folke; Emilio Moran; Alice N Pell; Peter Deadman; Timothy Kratz; Jane Lubchenco; Elinor Ostrom; Zhiyun Ouyang; William Provencher; Charles L Redman; Stephen H Schneider; William W Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship.

Authors:  Benoit Macaluso; Vincent Larivière; Thomas Sugimoto; Cassidy R Sugimoto
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success.

Authors:  Lindell Bromham; Russell Dinnage; Xia Hua
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Interdisciplinary Collaboration between Natural and Social Sciences - Status and Trends Exemplified in Groundwater Research.

Authors:  Roland Barthel; Roman Seidl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Claire Morandin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Does increased interdisciplinary contact among hard and social scientists help or hinder interdisciplinary research?

Authors:  Karolina Urbanska; Sylvie Huet; Serge Guimond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Development of a measure to evaluate competence perceptions of natural and social science.

Authors:  Caitlin K Kirby; Patricia Jaimes; Amanda R Lorenz-Reaves; Julie C Libarkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.