Literature DB >> 33524061

Pet owners' and veterinarians' perceptions of information exchange and clinical decision-making in companion animal practice.

Natasha Janke1, Jason B Coe1, Theresa M Bernardo1, Cate E Dewey1, Elizabeth A Stone2.   

Abstract

One of the most complex aspects of the veterinarian-client-patient interaction is the clinical decision-making process. Research suggests that the approach to communication used by veterinarians can impact veterinary clients' involvement in the decision-making process and their ultimate satisfaction. Using different approaches to the decision-making process may affect how information is exchanged and consequently how decisions are made. The objective of this study was to determine pet owners' expectations with respect to information exchange and decision-making during veterinarian-client-patient interactions and to compare veterinarians' perceptions of those expectations and the challenges they face in meeting them. Five pet owner focus groups (27 owners) and three veterinarian focus groups (24 veterinarians) were conducted with standardized open-ended questions and follow-up probes. Thematic analysis of the transcribed data was conducted to identify trends and patterns that emerged during the focus groups. Three pet owner-based themes were identified: 1) understanding the client; 2) providing information suitable for the client; and 3) decision-making. In addition, three barriers for veterinarians affecting information exchange and decision-making were identified: 1) time constraints; 2) involvement of multiple clients; and 3) language barriers. Results suggest that pet owners expect to be supported by their veterinarian to make informed decisions by understanding the client's current knowledge, tailoring information and educating clients about their options. Breakdowns in the information exchange process can impact pet owners' perceptions of veterinarians' motivations. Pet owners' emphasis on partnership suggests that a collaborative approach between veterinarians and clients may improve client satisfaction.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33524061      PMCID: PMC7850489          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  30 in total

1.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Veterinarian satisfaction with companion animal visits.

Authors:  Jane R Shaw; Cindy L Adams; Brenda N Bonnett; Susan Larson; Debra L Roter
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 1.936

3.  Veterinarian-client-patient communication patterns used during clinical appointments in companion animal practice.

Authors:  Jane R Shaw; Brenda N Bonnett; Cindy L Adams; Debra L Roter
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 1.936

4.  Effects of formal training in communication skills on the ability of veterinary students to communicate with clients.

Authors:  C E Latham; A Morris
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 5.  Using a diet history to improve adherence to dietary recommendations.

Authors:  Kathryn E Michel
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Vet       Date:  2009-01

6.  Veterinarian-client-patient communication during wellness appointments versus appointments related to a health problem in companion animal practice.

Authors:  Jane R Shaw; Cindy L Adams; Brenda N Bonnett; Susan Larson; Debra L Roter
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  A focus group study of veterinarians' and pet owners' perceptions of veterinarian-client communication in companion animal practice.

Authors:  Jason B Coe; Cindy L Adams; Brenda N Bonnett
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 1.936

8.  Analysing how negative emotions emerge and are addressed in veterinary consultations, using the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES).

Authors:  Malou Vijfhuizen; Harold Bok; Susan M Matthew; Lidia Del Piccolo; Michelle McArthur
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-11-03

9.  Communication styles of Swedish veterinarians involved in dairy herd health management: A motivational interviewing perspective.

Authors:  C Svensson; U Emanuelson; A M Bard; L Forsberg; H Wickström; K K Reyher
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Qualitative study of the communication expectations of clients accessing oncology care at a tertiary referral center for dogs with life-limiting cancer.

Authors:  Debbie L Stoewen; Jason B Coe; Clare MacMartin; Elizabeth A Stone; Catherine E Dewey
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 1.936

View more
  5 in total

1.  Small Animal Veterinarians' Communication With Dog Owners From a Motivational Interviewing Perspective.

Authors:  Karolina Brunius Enlund; Ebba Jennolf; Ann Pettersson
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-11-25

2.  Digital opportunities to connect and complain - the use of Facebook in small animal practice.

Authors:  Svenja Springer; Thomas Bøker Lund; Peter Sandøe; Sandra A Corr; Annemarie T Kristensen; Herwig Grimm
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2022-02-28

3.  Dog Owners' Perspectives on Canine Heart Disease in Klang Valley, Malaysia.

Authors:  Norhidayah Noordin; Kuan Hua Khor; Kuan Siew Khor; Yi Jun Lim; Yong Chong Lee
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Caregiver burden, treatment complexity, and the veterinarian-client relationship in owners of dog with skin disease.

Authors:  Mary Beth Spitznagel; Karlee Patrick; Andrew Hillier; Margaret Gober; Mark D Carlson
Journal:  Vet Dermatol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 1.867

5.  Development of infrastructure for a systemic multidisciplinary approach to study aging in retired sled dogs.

Authors:  Daria I Fleyshman; Joseph J Wakshlag; Heather J Huson; John P Loftus; Natasha J Olby; Leonid Brodsky; Andrei V Gudkov; Ekaterina L Andrianova
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 5.682

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.